Journal of Enterprise and Business Intelligence


Consumer Perceptions of Localized and Personalized Digital Marketing Content in Food Delivery Applications



Journal of Enterprise and Business Intelligence

Received On : 12 November 2025

Revised On : 23 December 2025

Accepted On : 18 January 2026

Published On : 05 April 2026

Volume 06, Issue 02

Pages : 072-081


Abstract


This study examines consumer attitudes toward personalized marketing in food delivery applications, with a focus on the roles of enjoyment, privacy, and trust. Using quantitative cross-sectional survey design, data were collected to evaluate user perceptions of personalized marketing content on digital food delivery platforms. The study is grounded in theories of personalization, privacy calculus, and digital trust, and investigates factors including enjoyment, comfort with data usage, perceived data security, trust, perceived usefulness, and behavioral intention. Descriptive statistical analysis revealed that consumers generally hold favorable attitudes toward personalized marketing due to its convenience and relevance. However, concerns regarding privacy and potential misuse of personal information moderate these positive perceptions. The findings highlight the importance of balancing personalization benefits with transparent data practices and strong privacy safeguards. The study provides practical implications for platform designers and marketers seeking to enhance user trust and engagement in food delivery applications.


Keywords


Personalized Marketing, Food Delivery Applications, Privacy Concerns, Digital Trust, Consumer Perception.


  1. B. Gao, Y. Wang, H. Xie, Y. Hu, and Y. Hu, “Artificial Intelligence in Advertising: Advancements, Challenges, and Ethical Considerations in Targeting, Personalization, Content Creation, and Ad Optimization,” Sage Open, vol. 13, no. 4, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1177/21582440231210759.
  2. E. Aguirre, D. Mahr, D. Grewal, K. de Ruyter, and M. Wetzels, “Unraveling the Personalization Paradox: The Effect of Information Collection and Trust-Building Strategies on Online Advertisement Effectiveness,” Journal of Retailing, vol. 91, no. 1, pp. 34–49, Mar. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jretai.2014.09.005.
  3. J. W. Shin, “AI-Driven Privacy Trade-Offs in Digital News Content: Consumer Perception of Personalized Advertising and Dynamic Paywall,” Journalism and Media, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 170, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.3390/journalmedia6040170.
  4. M. A. Pagnanelli, A. Colamatteo, F. Cassia, and M. Sansone, “Unveiling user intentions: an integrated analysis of hedonic motivation and service quality in e-grocery technology acceptance,” International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 1933–1950, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1108/ijqrm-02-2024-0062.
  5. J. B. Kim, “An empirical study on consumer first purchase intention in online shopping: integrating initial trust and TAM,” Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 125–150, Mar. 2012, doi: 10.1007/s10660-012-9089-5.
  6. S. Karwatzki, O. Dytynko, M. Trenz, and D. Veit, “Beyond the Personalization–Privacy Paradox: Privacy Valuation, Transparency Features, and Service Personalization,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 369–400, Apr. 2017, doi: 10.1080/07421222.2017.1334467.
  7. N. Çınar and A. Yahya, “Twenty-five years of privacy in advertising: a bibliometric analysis and thematic review,” International Journal of Advertising, pp. 1–37, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.1080/02650487.2025.2548646.
  8. T. Robles, B. Bordel, R. Alcarria, and D. Sánchez-de-Rivera, “Enabling trustworthy personal data protection in eHealth and well-being services through privacy-by-design,” International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, vol. 16, no. 5, p. 155014772091211, May 2020, doi: 10.1177/1550147720912110.
  9. B. C. M. Fung, K. Wang, and P. S. Yu, “Anonymizing Classification Data for Privacy Preservation,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 19, no. 5, pp. 711–725, May 2007, doi: 10.1109/tkde.2007.1015.
  10. H. Kargupta, S. Datta, Q. Wang, and Krishnamoorthy Sivakumar, “On the privacy preserving properties of random data perturbation techniques,” Third IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 99–106, doi: 10.1109/icdm.2003.1250908.
  11. W. Sun, “Toward a theory of ethical consumer intention formation: re-extending the theory of planned behavior,” AMS Review, vol. 10, no. 3–4, pp. 260–278, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1007/s13162-019-00156-6.
  12. Y. Guo, “Digital Trust and the Reconstruction of Trust in the Digital Society: An Integrated Model based on Trust Theory and Expectation Confirmation Theory,” Digital Government: Research and Practice, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1–19, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1145/3543860.
  13. D. M. Ashrafi, S. Ahmed, and T. S. Shahid, “Privacy or trust: understanding the privacy paradox in users intentions towards e-pharmacy adoption through the lens of privacy-calculus model,” Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, May 2024, doi: 10.1108/jstpm-09-2023-0149.
  14. J. Cloarec, L. Meyer‐Waarden, and A. Munzel, “Transformative privacy calculus: Conceptualizing the personalization‐privacy paradox on social media,” Psychology & Marketing, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 1574–1596, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1002/mar.21998.
  15. S. Vasan, A. A. Rao, and N. Gupta, “Investigating the opportunities and challenges influencing consumer purchase behaviors and media influence in online food ordering: a thematic analysis,” British Food Journal, vol. 127, no. 6, pp. 1984–1998, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.1108/bfj-10-2024-1071.
  16. H. Shyan, B. Verma, and M. Agarwal, “Analyzing Customer Preferences in the Food Delivery Industry Using Big Data,” 2024 IEEE 1st International Conference on Green Industrial Electronics and Sustainable Technologies (GIEST), pp. 1–5, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1109/giest62955.2024.10959949.

CRediT Author Statement


The author reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.


Acknowledgements


The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.


Funding


No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.


Ethics declarations


Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.


Availability of data and materials


No data available for above study.


Author information


Contributions

All authors have equal contribution in the paper and all authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


Corresponding author


Rights and permissions


Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NoDerivs is a more restrictive license. It allows you to redistribute the material commercially or non-commercially but the user cannot make any changes whatsoever to the original, i.e. no derivatives of the original work. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/


Cite this article


Marakhtanov Mikhali, “Consumer Perceptions of Localized and Personalized Digital Marketing Content in Food Delivery Applications”, Journal of Enterprise and Business Intelligence, vol.6, no.2, pp. 072-081, April 2026. doi: 10.53759/5181/JEBI202606008.


Copyright


© 2026 Marakhtanov Mikhali. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.