Journal of Machine and Computing


Integer Guided Linear Hopper Strategy in an LSTM Ensemble Framework for Prognosis Prediction



Journal of Machine and Computing

Received On : 23 July 2024

Revised On : 18 November 2024

Accepted On : 22 March 2025

Published On : 05 July 2025

Volume 05, Issue 03

Pages : 1373-1385


Abstract


Accurate and timely prognosis is essential for effective patient management and improved healthcare outcomes. This study introduces a novel ensemble framework that integrates Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, optimized using the Integer-Based Linear Hopper Optimization Algorithm (ILHOA). The model leverages CNN for spatial feature extraction and LSTM for capturing temporal patterns in clinical and laboratory data. ILHOA enhances model efficiency and robustness by selecting the most relevant features and eliminating redundancy. The proposed system includes data preprocessing, ILHOA-based feature selection, and a hybrid CNN-LSTM structure. Predictions from both deep learning models are combined through an ensemble process to boost generalization and reduce overfitting. The model’s performance is evaluated using key metrics including accuracy, precision, recall, F1-score, and AUC-ROC. Experimental results demonstrate the superiority of the ILHOA-optimized CNN-LSTM model over traditional machine learning and standalone deep learning approaches, offering high classification accuracy and reduced computational complexity. The hybrid architecture also improves interpretability, making it suitable for real-time clinical decision-making. Future work will focus on integrating attention mechanisms and validating the model with real-world patient datasets to enhance generalizability and expand its applicability across broader healthcare diagnostics.


Keywords


Prognosis, CNN-LSTM Ensemble, Hopper Optimization, Overfitting, Feature Selection, Deep Learning, Clinical Decision Making.


  1. J. Ahmad et al., “Disease Progression Detection via Deep Sequence Learning of Successive Radiographic Scans,” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 480, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010480.
  2. T. Zebin and S. Rezvy, “COVID-19 detection and disease progression visualization: Deep learning on chest X-rays for classification and coarse localization,” Applied Intelligence, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 1010–1021, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s10489-020-01867-1.
  3. T. Dang et al., “Exploring Longitudinal Cough, Breath, and Voice Data for COVID-19 Progression Prediction via Sequential Deep Learning: Model Development and Validation,” Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 24, no. 6, p. e37004, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.2196/37004.
  4. M. Vihinen, “Strategy for Disease Diagnosis, Progression Prediction, Risk Group Stratification and Treatment—Case of COVID-19,”Frontiers in Medicine, vol. 7, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00294.
  5. S. Alam Ansari and A. Zafar, “A fusion of dolphin swarm optimization and improved sine cosine algorithm for automatic detection and classification of objects from surveillance videos,” Measurement, vol. 192, p. 110921, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2022.110921.
  6. S. A. Ansari and A. Zafar, “Multi video summarization using query based deep optimization algorithm,” International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 3591–3606, May 2023, doi: 10.1007/s13042-023-01852-3.
  7. C. Fang et al., “Deep learning for predicting COVID-19 malignant progression,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 72, p. 102096, Aug. 2021, doi:10.1016/j.media.2021.102096.
  8. Y. Zoabi, S. Deri-Rozov, and N. Shomron, “Machine learning-based prediction of COVID-19 diagnosis based on symptoms,” npj Digital Medicine, vol. 4, no. 1, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1038/s41746-020-00372-6.
  9. O. Monjur, R. B. Preo, A. B. Shams, Md. M. S. Raihan, and F. Fairoz, “COVID-19 Prognosis and Mortality Risk Predictions from Symptoms: A Cloud-Based Smartphone Application,” BioMed, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 114–125, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.3390/biomed1020011.
  10. Yan, L., Zhang, H., Goncalves, J., Xiao, Y., Wang, M., Guo, Y., ... & Yuan, Y. (2020). A machine learning-based model for survival prediction in patients with severe COVID-19 infection.
  11. A. Karthikeyan, A. Garg, P. K. Vinod, and U. D. Priyakumar, “Machine Learning Based Clinical Decision Support System for Early COVID-19 Mortality Prediction,” Frontiers in Public Health, vol. 9, May 2021, doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.626697.
  12. M. Abbaspour Onari, S. Yousefi, M. Rabieepour, A. Alizadeh, and M. Jahangoshai Rezaee, “A medical decision support system for predicting the severity level of COVID-19,” Complex & Intelligent Systems, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 2037–2051, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s40747-021-00312-1.
  13. H. Sjödin et al., “COVID-19 healthcare demand and mortality in Sweden in response to non-pharmaceutical mitigation and suppression scenarios,” International Journal of Epidemiology, vol. 49, no. 5, pp. 1443–1453, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa121.
  14. A. Gatto, G. Accarino, V. Aloisi, F. Immorlano, F. Donato, and G. Aloisio, “Limits of Compartmental Models and New Opportunities for Machine Learning: A Case Study to Forecast the Second Wave of COVID-19 Hospitalizations in Lombardy, Italy,” Informatics, vol. 8, no. 3, p. 57, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.3390/informatics8030057.
  15. J. Tolles and T. Luong, “Modeling Epidemics with Compartmental Models,” JAMA, vol. 323, no. 24, p. 2515, Jun. 2020, doi:10.1001/jama.2020.8420.
  16. G. E. Weissman et al., “Locally Informed Simulation to Predict Hospital Capacity Needs During the COVID-19 Pandemic,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 173, no. 1, pp. 21–28, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.7326/m20-1260.
  17. D. Rafiq, A. Batool, and M. A. Bazaz, “Three months of COVID‐19: A systematic review and meta‐analysis,” Reviews in Medical Virology, vol. 30, no. 4, May 2020, doi: 10.1002/rmv.2113.
  18. A. Bhattacharya et al., “Development and Validation of a Clinical Symptom-based Scoring System for Diagnostic Evaluation of COVID-19 Patients Presenting to Outpatient Department in a Pandemic Situation,” Cureus, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.7759/cureus.13681.
  19. R. Avacharmal et al., “Mitigating Annotation Burden in Active Learning with Transfer Learning and Iterative Acquisition Functions,” 2024 15th International Conference on Computing Communication and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), pp. 1–7, Jun. 2024, doi:10.1109/icccnt61001.2024.10724595.
  20. M. Ashwin Shenoy and N. Thillaiarasu, “Enhancing temple surveillance through human activity recognition: A novel dataset and YOLOv4-ConvLSTM approach,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 11217–11232, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.3233/jifs-233919.
  21. B. S. Puttaswamy and N. Thillaiarasu, “Fine DenseNet based human personality recognition using english hand writing of non-native speakers,” Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, vol. 99, p. 106910, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2024.106910.
  22. P. Palanisamy, S. Urooj, R. Arunachalam, and A. Lay-Ekuakille, “A Novel Prognostic Model Using Chaotic CNN with Hybridized Spoofing for Enhancing Diagnostic Accuracy in Epileptic Seizure Prediction,” Diagnostics, vol. 13, no. 21, p. 3382, Nov. 2023, doi:10.3390/diagnostics13213382.
  23. C. Shen, A. Chen, C. Luo, J. Zhang, B. Feng, and W. Liao, “Using Reports of Symptoms and Diagnoses on Social Media to Predict COVID-19 Case Counts in Mainland China: Observational Infoveillance Study,” Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 22, no. 5, p. e19421, May 2020, doi: 10.2196/19421.
  24. S. Schalekamp et al., “Model-based Prediction of Critical Illness in Hospitalized Patients with COVID-19,” Radiology, vol. 298, no. 1, pp.E46–E54, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020202723.
  25. C. Zhang et al., “A Novel Scoring System for Prediction of Disease Severity in COVID-19,” Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, vol. 10, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00318.

CRediT Author Statement


The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows:

Conceptualization: Parthiban M, Anna Alphy and Sreedevi B; Methodology: Anna Alphy and Sreedevi B; Writing- Original Draft Preparation: Anna Alphy and Sreedevi B; Supervision: Anna Alphy and Sreedevi B; Validation: Parthiban M and Anna Alphy; Writing- Reviewing and Editing: Parthiban M, Anna Alphy and Sreedevi B; All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.


Acknowledgements


The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.


Funding


No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.


Ethics declarations


Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.


Availability of data and materials


Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study.


Author information


Contributions

All authors have equal contribution in the paper and all authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


Corresponding author


Rights and permissions


Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NoDerivs is a more restrictive license. It allows you to redistribute the material commercially or non-commercially but the user cannot make any changes whatsoever to the original, i.e. no derivatives of the original work. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/


Cite this article


Parthiban M, Anna Alphy and Sreedevi B, “Integer Guided Linear Hopper Strategy in an LSTM Ensemble Framework for Prognosis Prediction”, Journal of Machine and Computing, vol.5, no.3, pp. 1373-1385, July 2025, doi: 10.53759/7669/jmc202505108.


Copyright


© 2025 Parthiban M, Anna Alphy and Sreedevi B. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.