Journal of Robotics Spectrum


Human Robot Interaction: Applications, Challenges and Future Directions



Journal of Robotics Spectrum

Received On : 20 July 2023

Revised On : 18 September 2023

Accepted On : 10 October 2023

Published On : 18 October 2023

Volume 01, 2023

Pages : 111-121


Abstract


Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) has grown over the years and is now used in a wide range of contexts including medicine, manufacturing, physical therapy, customer care, agriculture, and education. HRI is utilized in many workplace settings that entail co-manipulating tasks as well as picking and placing operations in production lines, welding processes, painting and parts assembly. It is also used in assistive robotics for people with physical and cognitive impairments. This study explores HRI as applied across different fields such as industry, health care, rehabilitating agricultures, service and education. The paper analyzes several types of HRI including geographically or temporally separated interactions, distant ones or those that are social in nature. Finally the research shows the advantages of HRI on productivity increase in quality enhancement competitiveness increase and improved working conditions. Lastly, this research delves into a number of challenges along with future prospects regarding issues such as safety precautions required while engaging in HRI activities; acceptable social behavior; distribution of work among others; there are other possible downsides to some of these emerging technologies on general well-being as well. To ensure safe and effective human robot systems more human factors investigations must be conducted in this area.


Keywords


Human Robot Interaction, Assistive Robots, Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, Social Robots, Socially Interactive Robots, Smart Manufacturing.


  1. R. Craven, J. M. Franasiak, P. Mosaly, and P. A. Gehrig, “Ergonomic Deficits in Robotic Gynecologic Oncology Surgery: a need for intervention,” Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 648–655, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.04.008.
  2. H. Su, W. Qi, J.-H. Chen, and D. Zhang, “Fuzzy Approximation-Based Task-Space control of robot manipulators with remote center of motion constraint,” IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1564–1573, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1109/tfuzz.2022.3157075.
  3. G. Hoffman, “Evaluating fluency in Human–Robot collaboration,” IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 209–218, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1109/thms.2019.2904558.
  4. A. H, A. R, and S. M, “Smart Sensor Networking and Green Technologies in Urban Areas,” Computing and Communication Systems in Urban Development, pp. 205–224, 2019, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-26013-2_10.
  5. W. Hu, G. Z. Lum, M. Mastrangeli, and M. Sitti, “Small-scale soft-bodied robot with multimodal locomotion,” Nature, vol. 554, no. 7690, pp. 81–85, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1038/nature25443.
  6. L. B. Jahromi, C. I. Bryce, and J. Swanson, “The importance of self-regulation for the school and peer engagement of children with high-functioning autism,” Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 235–246, Feb. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.rasd.2012.08.012.
  7. D. Zheng, T. Liwinski, and E. Elinav, “Interaction between microbiota and immunity in health and disease,” Cell Research, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 492–506, May 2020, doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0332-7.
  8. T. Noritsugu and T. Tanaka, “Application of rubber artificial muscle manipulator as a rehabilitation robot,” IEEE-ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 259–267, Jan. 1997, doi: 10.1109/3516.653050.
  9. F. Longo, L. Nicoletti, and A. Padovano, “Smart operators in industry 4.0: A human-centered approach to enhance operators’ capabilities and competencies within the new smart factory context,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 113, pp. 144–159, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2017.09.016.
  10. M. Li, A. Milojević, and H. Handroos, “Robotics in Manufacturing—The Past and the Present,” in Springer eBooks, 2020, pp. 85–95. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-46103-4_4.
  11. R. Prus and D. L. Jorgensen, “Participant Observation: a Methodology for Human studies,” Canadian Journal of Sociology, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 371, Jan. 1990, doi: 10.2307/3340930.
  12. A. C. Pierno, M. Mari, D. Lusher, and U. Castiello, “Robotic movement elicits visuomotor priming in children with autism,” Neuropsychologia, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 448–454, Jan. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.08.020.
  13. S. Ayub, N. Singh, Md. Z. Hussain, M. Ashraf, D. K. Singh, and A. Haldorai, “Hybrid Approach to Implement Multi-robotic Navigation System Using Neural Network, Fuzzy Logic and Bio-inspired Optimization Methodologies,” Oct. 2021, doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-975723/v1.
  14. A. A. M. Faudzi, J. Ooga, T. Goto, M. Takeichi, and K. Suzumori, “Index finger of a Human-Like robotic hand using thin soft muscles,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 92–99, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1109/lra.2017.2732059.
  15. J. K. Burgoon, J. A. Bonito, B. Bengtsson, C. Cederberg, M. Lundeberg, and L. E. Allspach, “Interactivity in human–computer interaction: a study of credibility, understanding, and influence,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 553–574, Nov. 2000, doi: 10.1016/s0747-5632(00)00029-7.
  16. R. Tombropoulos, J. R. Adler, and J. Latombe, “CARABEAMER: a treatment planner for a robotic radiosurgical system with general kinematics,” Medical Image Analysis, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 237–264, Sep. 1999, doi: 10.1016/s1361-8415(99)80022-x.
  17. T. Fong, I. Nourbakhsh, and K. Dautenhahn, “A survey of socially interactive robots,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 42, no. 3–4, pp. 143–166, Mar. 2003, doi: 10.1016/s0921-8890(02)00372-x.
  18. F. Broz, I. Nourbakhsh, and R. Simmons, “Planning for Human–Robot interaction in socially situated tasks,” International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 193–214, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1007/s12369-013-0185-z.
  19. B. Duffy, “Anthropomorphism and the social robot,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 42, no. 3–4, pp. 177–190, Mar. 2003, doi: 10.1016/s0921-8890(02)00374-3.
  20. A. Tapus, M. J. Matarić, and B. Scasselati, “Socially assistive robotics [Grand Challenges of Robotics],” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 35–42, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1109/mra.2007.339605.
  21. D. Silvera-Tawil, D. Rye, and M. Velonaki, “Artificial skin and tactile sensing for socially interactive robots: A review,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 63, pp. 230–243, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.robot.2014.09.008.
  22. T. C. Burnham and B. Hare, “Engineering human cooperation,” Human Nature, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 88–108, Jul. 2007, doi: 10.1007/s12110-007-9012-2.
  23. H. Liu, Y. Zhang, W. Si, X. Xie, Y. Zhu, and S. Zhu, “Interactive Robot Knowledge Patching Using Augmented Reality,” 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), May 2018, doi: 10.1109/icra.2018.8462837.
  24. R. E. Yagoda and D. J. Gillan, “You want me to trust a ROBOT? The development of a Human–Robot Interaction trust scale,” International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 235–248, Mar. 2012, doi: 10.1007/s12369-012-0144-0.
  25. S. Qiang et al., “A miniature robotic turtle with target tracking and wireless charging systems based on IPMCs,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 187156–187164, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1109/access.2020.3026333.
  26. J. De Winter and D. Dodou, “Why the Fitts list has persisted throughout the history of function allocation,” Cognition, Technology & Work, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–11, Aug. 2011, doi: 10.1007/s10111-011-0188-1.
  27. A. E. Clark and A. J. Oswald, “Satisfaction and comparison income,” Journal of Public Economics, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 359–381, Sep. 1996, doi: 10.1016/0047-2727(95)01564-7.
  28. R. Djebarni and A. Al‐Abed, “Satisfaction level with neighbourhoods in low‐income public housing in Yemen,” Property Management, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 230–242, Oct. 2000, doi: 10.1108/02637470010348744.
  29. A. Stutzer, “The role of income aspirations in individual happiness,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 89–109, May 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.jebo.2003.04.003.
  30. A. E. Clark, A. Knabe, and S. Rätzel, “Boon or bane? Others’ unemployment, well-being and job insecurity,” Labour Economics, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 52–61, Jan. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.labeco.2009.05.007.
  31. D. G. Blanchflower, “Unemployment, Well-Being, and wage curves in Eastern and Central Europe,” Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 364–402, Dec. 2001, doi: 10.1006/jjie.2001.0485.
  32. R. Winkelmann, “Unemployment, social capital, and subjective Well-Being,” Journal of Happiness Studies, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 421–430, Apr. 2008, doi: 10.1007/s10902-008-9097-2.
  33. N. Weinstein, Human motivation and interpersonal relationships: Theory, Research, and Applications. Springer Science & Business Media, 2014.
  34. H. Feldmann, “Technological unemployment in industrial countries,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics, vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 1099–1126, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1007/s00191-013-0308-6.
  35. K. Naveen Durai, R. Subha, and A. Haldorai, “Hybrid Invasive Weed Improved Grasshopper Optimization Algorithm for Cloud Load Balancing,” Intelligent Automation & Soft Computing, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 467–483, 2022, doi: 10.32604/iasc.2022.026020.
  36. A. G. C. Gonzalez, M. V. S. Alves, G. S. Viana, L. K. Carvalho, and J. C. Basilio, “Supervisory Control-Based Navigation Architecture: a new framework for autonomous robots in industry 4.0 environments,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1732–1743, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1109/tii.2017.2788079.

Acknowledgements


Authors thank Reviewers for taking the time and effort necessary to review the manuscript.


Funding


No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.


Ethics declarations


Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.


Availability of data and materials


No data available for above study.


Author information


Contributions

All authors have equal contribution in the paper and all authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


Corresponding author


Rights and permissions


Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NoDerivs is a more restrictive license. It allows you to redistribute the material commercially or non-commercially but the user cannot make any changes whatsoever to the original, i.e. no derivatives of the original work. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/


Cite this article


Brian Kirby, “Human Robot Interaction: Applications, Challenges and Future Directions”, Journal of Robotics Spectrum, vol.1, pp. 111-121, 2023. doi: 10.53759/9852/JRS202301011.


Copyright


© 2023 Brian Kirby. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.