Journal of Machine and Computing


Energy-Efficient Fault Data Prediction and Transmission in WSN IoT using Bio-Inspired Optimization and Deep Learning



Journal of Machine and Computing

Received On : 02 April 2024

Revised On : 30 November 2024

Accepted On : 20 March 2025

Published On : 05 April 2025

Volume 05, Issue 02

Pages : 1186-1203


Abstract


Wireless sensor networks (WSNs) are crucial for several applications. WSN nodes frequently function with constrained battery capacity, rendering energy efficiency a critical issue for clustering and routing. Moreover, a principal challenge of WSNs is ensuring the dependability and security of transmitted data in susceptible contexts to avert hostile node attacks. This study seeks to establish a secure and energy-efficient routing system for fault data prediction to improve the longevity and dependability of WSNs. This paper presents a sophisticated framework for intelligent fault prediction and energy-efficient data transmission in WSN, utilising bio-inspired optimisation and deep learning methodologies. The model initiates data fault prediction with Multi-Term Fourier Graph Neural Networks (MTFGNN), which examine temporal and spatial relationships to detect anomalies and defective nodes prior to clustering. Faultless nodes are subsequently categorised by Fuzzy C-Means (FCM) clustering, facilitating adaptive and efficient cluster creation. Quokka Swarm Optimisation (QSO) is utilised to improve energy efficiency by selecting ideal cluster heads (CH), thereby balancing energy usage and reducing intra-cluster communication expenses. A trust-based routing technique employs Proximal Policy Optimisation (PPO), a reinforcement learning method that dynamically identifies secure and energy-efficient pathways for data transfer, while reducing the influence of unreliable nodes. The experimental results indicate that it surpasses the rival methods across multiple performance parameters. The performance outcomes of quality of service (QoS) metrics are delineated as follows: energy consumption (0.204), throughput (0.701), packet delivery rate (94.24%), network lifetime (1310 rounds), and fault prediction accuracy (99.78%), precision (98.69%), recall (97.52%) and F1 score (97.83).


Keywords


Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNS), Quokka Swarm Optimisation (QSO), Multi-Term Fourier Graph Neural Networks (MTFGNN), Fuzzy C-Means (FCM), Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO), Cluster Head (CH).


  1. G. Mahalakshmi, S. Ramalingam, and A. Manikandan, “An energy efficient data fault prediction-based clustering and routing protocol using hybrid ASSO with MERNN in wireless sensor network,” Telecommunication Systems, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 61–82, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11235-024-01109-6.
  2. N. Sharma, U. Agarwal, S. Shaurya, S. Mishra, and O. J. Pandey, “Energy-Efficient and QoS-Aware Data Routing in Node Fault Prediction Based IoT Networks,” IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 4585–4599, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1109/tnsm.2023.3268676.
  3. C. Del-Valle-Soto, A. Rodríguez, and C. R. Ascencio-Piña, “A survey of energy-efficient clustering routing protocols for wireless sensor networks based on metaheuristic approaches,” Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 9699–9770, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10462-023-10402-w.
  4. R. Bharathi, S. Kannadhasan, B. Padminidevi, M. S. Maharajan, R. Nagarajan, and M. M. Tonmoy, “Predictive Model Techniques with Energy Efficiency for IoT-Based Data Transmission in Wireless Sensor Networks,” Journal of Sensors, vol. 2022, pp. 1–18, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1155/2022/3434646.
  5. S. M, A. S. Pillai, and A. Anpalagan, “Self-healing and optimal fault tolerant routing in wireless sensor networks using genetical swarm optimization,” Computer Networks, vol. 217, p. 109359, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2022.109359.
  6. M. Sadrishojaei, N. J. Navimipour, M. Reshadi, and M. Hosseinzadeh, “A New Preventive Routing Method Based on Clustering and Location Prediction in the Mobile Internet of Things,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 8, no. 13, pp. 10652–10664, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1109/jiot.2021.3049631.
  7. N. Malisetti and V. K. Pamula, “Energy efficient cluster-based routing for wireless sensor networks using moth levy adopted artificial electric field algorithm and customized grey wolf optimization algorithm,” Microprocessors and Microsystems, vol. 93, p. 104593, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.micpro.2022.104593.
  8. R. Shanmugam and B. Kaliaperumal, “An energy‐efficient clustering and cross‐layer‐based opportunistic routing protocol (CORP) for wireless sensor network,” International Journal of Communication Systems, vol. 34, no. 7, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1002/dac.4752.
  9. S. S. Kalburgi and M. Manimozhi, “Taylor-spotted hyena optimization algorithm for reliable and energy-efficient cluster head selection based secure data routing and failure tolerance in WSN,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 81, no. 11, pp. 15815–15839, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11042-022-12302-7.
  10. S. Loganathan and J. Arumugam, “Energy Efficient Clustering Algorithm Based on Particle Swarm Optimization Technique for Wireless Sensor Networks,” Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 119, no. 1, pp. 815–843, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11277-021-08239-z.
  11. P. P. I. Vazhuthi, A. Prasanth, S. P. Manikandan, and K. K. D. Sowndarya, “A hybrid ANFIS reptile optimization algorithm for energy-efficient inter-cluster routing in internet of things-enabled wireless sensor networks,” Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 1049–1068, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s12083-023-01458-0.
  12. V. P. Raj and M. Duraipandian, “An energy-efficient cross-layer-based opportunistic routing protocol and partially informed sparse autoencoder for data transfer in wireless sensor network,” Journal of Engineering Research, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 122–132, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jer.2023.10.023.
  13. K. Lakshmanna, N. Subramani, Y. Alotaibi, S. Alghamdi, O. I. Khalafand, and A. K. Nanda, “Improved Metaheuristic-Driven Energy-Aware Cluster-Based Routing Scheme for IoT-Assisted Wireless Sensor Networks,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 13, p. 7712, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.3390/su14137712.
  14. K. Giridhar, C. Anbuananth, and N. Krishnaraj, “Energy efficient clustering with Heuristic optimization-based Ro/uting protocol for VANETs,” Measurement: Sensors, vol. 27, p. 100745, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.measen.2023.100745.
  15. G. Kaur and P. Chanak, “An Intelligent Fault Tolerant Data Routing Scheme for Wireless Sensor Network-Assisted Industrial Internet of Things,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 5543–5553, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1109/tii.2022.3204560.
  16. V. Cherappa, T. Thangarajan, S. S. Meenakshi Sundaram, F. Hajjej, A. K. Munusamy, and R. Shanmugam, “Energy-Efficient Clustering and Routing Using ASFO and a Cross-Layer-Based Expedient Routing Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 5, p. 2788, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.3390/s23052788.
  17. N. Moussa and A. El Belrhiti El Alaoui, “An energy-efficient cluster-based routing protocol using unequal clustering and improved ACO techniques for WSNs,” Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 1334–1347, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s12083-020-01056-4.
  18. K. Krishnan, B. Yamini, W. M. Alenazy, and M. Nalini, “Energy-Efficient Cluster-Based Routing Protocol for WSN Based on Hybrid BSO–TLBO Optimization Model,” The Computer Journal, vol. 64, no. 10, pp. 1477–1493, May 2021, doi: 10.1093/comjnl/bxab044.
  19. R. Reka, A. Manikandan, C. Venkataramanan, and R. Madanachitran, “An energy efficient clustering with enhanced chicken swarm optimization algorithm with adaptive position routing protocol in mobile adhoc network,” Telecommunication Systems, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 183–202, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11235-023-01041-1.
  20. M. K. Roberts and P. Ramasamy, “Optimized hybrid routing protocol for energy-aware cluster head selection in wireless sensor networks,” Digital Signal Processing, vol. 130, p. 103737, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.dsp.2022.103737.
  21. T. Vaiyapuri, V. S. Parvathy, V. Manikandan, N. Krishnaraj, D. Gupta, and K. Shankar, “A Novel Hybrid Optimization for Cluster‐Based Routing Protocol in Information-Centric Wireless Sensor Networks for IoT Based Mobile Edge Computing,” Wireless Personal Communications, vol. 127, no. 1, pp. 39–62, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11277-021-08088-w.
  22. M. Rami Reddy, M. L. Ravi Chandra, P. Venkatramana, and R. Dilli, “Energy-Efficient Cluster Head Selection in Wireless Sensor Networks Using an Improved Grey Wolf Optimization Algorithm,” Computers, vol. 12, no. 2, p. 35, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.3390/computers12020035.
  23. K. SureshKumar and P. Vimala, “Energy efficient routing protocol using exponentially-ant lion whale optimization algorithm in wireless sensor networks,” Computer Networks, vol. 197, p. 108250, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.comnet.2021.108250.
  24. S. Bharany, S. Sharma, N. Alsharabi, E. Tag Eldin, and N. A. Ghamry, “Energy-efficient clustering protocol for underwater wireless sensor networks using optimized glowworm swarm optimization,” Frontiers in Marine Science, vol. 10, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.3389/fmars.2023.1117787.
  25. B. Han, F. Ran, J. Li, L. Yan, H. Shen, and A. Li, “A Novel Adaptive Cluster Based Routing Protocol for Energy-Harvesting Wireless Sensor Networks,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 4, p. 1564, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.3390/s22041564.
  26. S. V. N. Santhosh Kumar, Y. Palanichamy, M. Selvi, S. Ganapathy, A. Kannan, and S. P. Perumal, “Energy efficient secured K means based unequal fuzzy clustering algorithm for efficient reprogramming in wireless sensor networks,” Wireless Networks, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 3873–3894, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11276-021-02660-9.
  27. W. J. AL-kubaisy and B. AL-Khateeb, “Quokka swarm optimization: A new nature-inspired metaheuristic optimization algorithm,” Journal of Intelligent Systems, vol. 33, no. 1, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1515/jisys-2024-0051.
  28. T. Zhang, “An intelligent routing algorithm for energy prediction of 6G-powered wireless sensor networks,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 76, pp. 35–49, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2023.06.038.

CRediT Author Statement


The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows:

Conceptualization: Umarani C, Gokul Prasad C, Velumani R and Thangaraj K; Methodology: Umarani C and Gokul Prasad C; Software: Velumani R and Thangaraj K; Data Curation: Umarani C and Gokul Prasad C; Writing- Original Draft Preparation: Umarani C, Gokul Prasad C, Velumani R and Thangaraj K; Visualization: Umarani C and Gokul Prasad C; Investigation: Velumani R and Thangaraj K; Supervision: Umarani C and Gokul Prasad C; Validation: Velumani R and Thangaraj K; Writing- Reviewing and Editing: Umarani C, Gokul Prasad C, Velumani R and Thangaraj K; All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.


Acknowledgements


Authors thank Reviewers for taking the time and effort necessary to review the manuscript.


Funding


No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.


Ethics declarations


Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.


Availability of data and materials


Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study.


Author information


Contributions

All authors have equal contribution in the paper and all authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


Corresponding author


Rights and permissions


Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NoDerivs is a more restrictive license. It allows you to redistribute the material commercially or non-commercially but the user cannot make any changes whatsoever to the original, i.e. no derivatives of the original work. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/


Cite this article


Umarani C, Gokul Prasad C, Velumani R and Thangaraj K, “Energy-Efficient Fault Data Prediction and Transmission in WSN IoT using Bio-Inspired Optimization and Deep Learning”, Journal of Machine and Computing, pp. 1186-1203, April 2025, doi: 10.53759/7669/jmc202505094.


Copyright


© 2025 Umarani C, Gokul Prasad C, Velumani R and Thangaraj K. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.