Journal of Machine and Computing


Improved Real Time User Interaction in Extended Reality Systems Using the Deployment of Adaptive Intelligent Technologies



Journal of Machine and Computing

Received On : 14 March 2024

Revised On : 29 June 2024

Accepted On : 26 February 2025

Published On : 05 April 2025

Volume 05, Issue 02

Pages : 933-949


Abstract


The Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) field has seen rapid growth in various industries due to the introduction of Extended Reality (XR) environments. These environments require improved interface methods, real-time processing, low latency, and integrated User Experience (UE) servicing. This work aims to improve user interactions in real-time XR environments and introduces a new Hierarchical Adaptive System (HAS) to address these challenges. This study presents a Real-Time Adaptation Model (RTAM) for XR interfaces, which combines adaptive optimized performance, Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL), and Fuzzy Logic (FL). The system addresses unpredictability, Dynamic Resource Allocation (DRA), and parallel processing pipelines. HAS did better than the best methods by 46.3% in terms of Faster Learning Integration (FLI), 63.2% in terms of Lower Error Rates (LER), and 37.4% in terms of Reduced Task Completion Times (RTCT) in a study with 60 users in different interactive settings. Despite maintaining low adaptation latency, the system achieves a score of 0.86 for resource utilization efficiency. The study also identified improvements in system responsiveness and overall satisfaction. The results support that HAS effectively solves RTAM issues in XR settings, laying the basis for next-generation immersive apps with more responsive and user-centered communication models.


Keywords


Extended Reality, User-Centric Interaction, Hierarchical Adaptive System, Human-Computer Interaction, Latency, Deep Learning.


  1. A. Alhakamy, “Extended Reality (XR) Toward Building Immersive Solutions: The Key to Unlocking Industry 4.0,” ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 1–38, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1145/3652595.
  2. A. Alnagrat, R. Che Ismail, S. Z. Syed Idrus, and R. M. Abdulhafith Alfaqi, “A Review of Extended Reality (XR) Technologies in the Future of Human Education: Current Trend and Future Opportunity,” Journal of Human Centered Technology, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 81–96, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.11113/humentech. v1n2.27.
  3. “An E-Commerce Based Personalized Health Product Recommendation System Using CNN-Bi-LSTM Model,” International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 398–410, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.22266/ijies2023.1231.33.
  4. B. R. R. Reddy and R. L. Kumar, “A Fusion Model for Personalized Adaptive Multi-Product Recommendation System Using Transfer Learning and Bi-GRU,” Computers, Materials & Continua, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 4081–4107, 2024, doi: 10.32604/cmc.2024.057071.
  5. H. Allioui and Y. Mourdi, “Exploring the Full Potentials of IoT for Better Financial Growth and Stability: A Comprehensive Survey,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 19, p. 8015, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.3390/s23198015.
  6. S. Kunjiappan, L. K. Ramasamy, S. Kannan, P. Pavadai, P. Theivendren, and P. Palanisamy, “Optimization of ultrasound-aided extraction of bioactive ingredients from Vitis vinifera seeds using RSM and ANFIS modeling with machine learning algorithm,” Scientific Reports, vol. 14, no. 1, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49839-y.
  7. X. Wang, L. Shen, & L. H. Lee, “A Systematic Review of XR-based Remote Human-Robot Interaction Systems,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.11384, 2024.
  8. N. Krishnadoss and L. K. Ramasamy, “Crop yield prediction with environmental and chemical variables using optimized ensemble predictive model in machine learning,” Environmental Research Communications, vol. 6, no. 10, p. 101001, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.1088/2515-7620/ad7e81.
  9. P. Krishnamoorthy et al., “Effective Scheduling of Multi-Load Automated Guided Vehicle in Spinning Mill: A Case Study,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 9389–9402, 2023, doi: 10.1109/access.2023.3236843.
  10. M. Hoover and E. Winer, “Designing Adaptive Extended Reality Training Systems Based on Expert Instructor Behaviors,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 138160–138173, 2021, doi: 10.1109/access.2021.3118105.
  11. T. Gopalakrishnan, P. Sengottuvelan, A. Bharathi, R. Lokeshkumar, "An Approach To Webpage Prediction Method Using Variable Order Markov Model In Recommendation Systems," Journal of Internet Technology, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 415-424, 2018.
  12. K. M. Stanney, C. Hughes, H. Nye, E. Cross, C. Boger, and S. Deming, “Interaction Design for Augmented, Virtual, and Extended Reality Environments,” Interaction Techniques and Technologies in Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 355–405, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.1201/9781003490678-13.
  13. Mahalakshmi, R. L. Kumar, K. S. Ranjini, S. Sindhu, and R. Udhayakumar, “Efficient authenticated key establishment protocol for telecare medicine information systems,” Industrial, Mechanical And Electrical Engineering, vol. 2676, p. 020006, 2022, doi: 10.1063/5.0117522.
  14. S. Zhu et al., “Intelligent Computing: The Latest Advances, Challenges, and Future,” Intelligent Computing, vol. 2, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.34133/icomputing.0006.
  15. Z. Masood, Z. Jiangbin, I. Ahmad, C. Dongdong, W. Shabbir, and M. Irfan, “A novel continual reinforcement learning-based expert system for self-optimization of soft real-time systems,” Expert Systems with Applications, vol. 238, p. 122309, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122309.
  16. P. Selvam et al., “A Transformer-Based Framework for Scene Text Recognition,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 100895–100910, 2022, doi: 10.1109/access.2022.3207469.
  17. S. Sengan, S. Vairavasundaram, L. Ravi, A. Q. M. AlHamad, H. A. Alkhazaleh, and M. Alharbi, “Fake News Detection Using Stance Extracted Multimodal Fusion-Based Hybrid Neural Network,” IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 5146–5157, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1109/tcss.2023.3269087.
  18. R. Lokeshkumar, O. Mishra, and S. Kalra, “Social media data analysis to predict mental state of users using machine learning techniques,” Journal of Education and Health Promotion, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 301, 2021, doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_446_20.
  19. A. Sadeghi Milani, A. Cecil-Xavier, A. Gupta, J. Cecil, and S. Kennison, “A Systematic Review of Human–Computer Interaction (HCI) Research in Medical and Other Engineering Fields,” International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 515–536, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1080/10447318.2022.2116530.
  20. K. Pfeuffer, H. Gellersen, and M. Gonzalez-Franco, “Design Principles and Challenges for Gaze + Pinch Interaction in XR,” IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 74–81, May 2024, doi: 10.1109/mcg.2024.3382961.
  21. U. Chadha et al., “Powder Bed Fusion via Machine Learning-Enabled Approaches,” Complexity, vol. 2023, pp. 1–25, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1155/2023/9481790.
  22. R. K. Poluru and R. Lokeshkumar, “Meta-Heuristic MOALO Algorithm for Energy-Aware Clustering in the Internet of Things,” International Journal of Swarm Intelligence Research, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 74–93, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.4018/ijsir.2021040105.

CRediT Author Statement


The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows:

Conceptualization: Hayder M A Ghanimi, Sathvik Bagam, Shaishav Shah, Vedaraj M, Manjunath T C and Manoranjan Kumar Sinha; Methodology: Sathvik Bagam and Shaishav Shah; Software: Shaishav Shah, Vedaraj M, Manjunath T C and Manoranjan Kumar Sinha; Data Curation: Shaishav Shah, Vedaraj M, Manjunath T C and Manoranjan Kumar Sinha; Writing- Original Draft Preparation: Hayder M A Ghanimi, Sathvik Bagam, Shaishav Shah, Vedaraj M, Manjunath T C and Manoranjan Kumar Sinha; Visualization: Shaishav Shah, Vedaraj M, Manjunath T C and Manoranjan Kumar Sinha; Investigation: Hayder M A Ghanimi, Sathvik Bagam, Shaishav Shah, Vedaraj M, Manjunath T C and Manoranjan Kumar Sinha; Supervision: Sathvik Bagam and Shaishav Shah; Validation: Shaishav Shah, Vedaraj M, Manjunath T C and Manoranjan Kumar Sinha; Writing- Reviewing and Editing: Hayder M A Ghanimi, Sathvik Bagam, Shaishav Shah, Vedaraj M, Manjunath T C and Manoranjan Kumar Sinha; All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.


Acknowledgements


Authors thank Reviewers for taking the time and effort necessary to review the manuscript.


Funding


No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.


Ethics declarations


Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.


Availability of data and materials


Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study.


Author information


Contributions

All authors have equal contribution in the paper and all authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


Corresponding author


Rights and permissions


Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NoDerivs is a more restrictive license. It allows you to redistribute the material commercially or non-commercially but the user cannot make any changes whatsoever to the original, i.e. no derivatives of the original work. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/


Cite this article


Hayder M A Ghanimi, Sathvik Bagam, Shaishav Shah, Vedaraj M, Manjunath T C and Manoranjan Kumar Sinha, “Improved Real Time User Interaction in Extended Reality Systems Using the Deployment of Adaptive Intelligent Technologies”, Journal of Machine and Computing, pp. 933-949, April 2025, doi: 10.53759/7669/jmc202505074.


Copyright


© 2025 Hayder M A Ghanimi, Sathvik Bagam, Shaishav Shah, Vedaraj M, Manjunath T C and Manoranjan Kumar Sinha. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.