Journal of Machine and Computing


Mitigating Air Pollution Risks with Deep Learning: A Quantum-Optimized Approach for Nitrogen Dioxide Prediction in Los Angeles



Journal of Machine and Computing

Received On : 10 March 2024

Revised On : 29 September 2024

Accepted On : 20 January 2025

Published On : 05 April 2025

Volume 05, Issue 02

Pages : 709-719


Abstract


Air pollution causes about seven million pre mature deaths globally every year, making it a critical issue that requires urgent attention. The key to mitigating its devastating effects lies in understanding its nature, identifying sources and trends, and predicting its. Accurate Real-time air pollution forecasting is a challenging task due to its spatiotemporal dynamics, requiring sophisticated modeling approaches. In our study, employed the Sequential Array-based Convolutional LSTM (SACLSTM) framework, which captures spatial and temporal correlations by integrating deep CNNs for spatial analysis with deep LSTM models for temporal prediction. To further enhance the model's accuracy, optimized the SACLSTM parameters using the Quantum-based Draft Mongoose Optimization Algorithm (QDMOA). Using ten days of nitrogen dioxide (NO₂) data from Los Angeles County, developed a sequential encoder-decoder network capable of predicting air pollution levels ten days into the future. By reformatting satellite air quality images into a 5D tensor, achieved precise predictions of nitrogen dioxide concentrations across various locations and time periods in Los Angeles. Our results are thoroughly documented with metrics and visualizations, clearly demonstrating the factors behind the improved accuracy. The comparison of results highlights the effectiveness of our approach in providing reliable air pollution forecasts.


Keywords


Air pollution, Convolutional Neural Networks, Quantum Based Draf Mongoose Optimization Algorithm, Long Short-Term Memory, Los Angeles.


  1. Z. Zhang, S. Zhang, C. Chen, and J. Yuan, “A systematic survey of air quality prediction based on deep learning,” Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 93, pp. 128–141, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.aej.2024.03.031.
  2. I.-I. Prado-Rujas, A. García-Dopico, E. Serrano, M. L. Córdoba, and M. S. Pérez, “A multivariable sensor-agnostic framework for spatio-temporal air quality forecasting based on Deep Learning,” Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, vol. 127, p. 107271, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.107271.
  3. A. Mishra and Y. Gupta, “Comparative analysis of Air Quality Index prediction using deep learning algorithms,” Spatial Information Research, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 63–72, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s41324-023-00541-1.
  4. K. H. Hettige, J. Ji, S. Xiang, C. Long, G. Cong, & J. Wang, "AirPhyNet: Harnessing Physics-Guided Neural Networks for Air Quality Prediction ", 2024, arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.03784.
  5. G. Suthar, N. Kaul, S. Khandelwal, and S. Singh, “Predicting land surface temperature and examining its relationship with air pollution and urban parameters in Bengaluru: A machine learning approach,” Urban Climate, vol. 53, p. 101830, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.uclim.2024.101830.
  6. Z. Abbas and P. Raina, “A wavelet enhanced approach with ensemble based deep learning approach to detect air pollution,” Multimedia Tools and Applications, vol. 83, no. 6, pp. 17531–17555, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11042-023-16167-2.
  7. B. P. Nandi, G. Singh, A. Jain, and D. K. Tayal, “Evolution of neural network to deep learning in prediction of air, water pollution and its Indian context,” International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1021–1036, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s13762-023-04911-y.
  8. H. Y. Kek et al., “Particle dispersion for indoor air quality control considering air change approach: A novel accelerated CFD-DNN prediction,” Energy and Buildings, vol. 306, p. 113938, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.113938.
  9. K. Aravinda, B. Santosh Kumar, B. P. Kavin, and A. Thirumalraj, “Traffic Sign Detection for Real-World Application Using Hybrid Deep Belief Network Classification,” Advanced Geospatial Practices in Natural Environment Resource Management, pp. 214–233, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-1396-1.ch011.
  10. S. A. Aram et al., “Machine learning-based prediction of air quality index and air quality grade: a comparative analysis,” International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 1345–1360, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s13762-023-05016-2.
  11. S. Wang, J. McGibbon, and Y. Zhang, “Predicting high-resolution air quality using machine learning: Integration of large eddy simulation and urban morphology data,” Environmental Pollution, vol. 344, p. 123371, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123371.
  12. D. Tang, Y. Zhan, and F. Yang, “A review of machine learning for modeling air quality: Overlooked but important issues,” Atmospheric Research, vol. 300, p. 107261, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2024.107261.
  13. A. Thirumalraj, R. Chandrashekar, G. B., and P. kavin Balasubramanian, “NMRA-Facilitated Optimized Deep Learning Framework,” Developments Towards Next Generation Intelligent Systems for Sustainable Development, pp. 247–268, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-5643-2.ch010.
  14. Q. Liu, B. Cui, and Z. Liu, “Air Quality Class Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods Based on Monitoring Data and Secondary Modeling,” Atmosphere, vol. 15, no. 5, p. 553, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.3390/atmos15050553.
  15. A. A. M. Ahmed, S. J. J. Jui, E. Sharma, M. H. Ahmed, N. Raj, and A. Bose, “An advanced deep learning predictive model for air quality index forecasting with remote satellite-derived hydro-climatological variables,” Science of The Total Environment, vol. 906, p. 167234, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167234.
  16. M. Ansari and M. Alam, “An Intelligent IoT-Cloud-Based Air Pollution Forecasting Model Using Univariate Time-Series Analysis,” Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 3135–3162, May 2023, doi: 10.1007/s13369-023-07876-9.
  17. C. Yu et al., “MGSFformer: A Multi-Granularity Spatiotemporal Fusion Transformer for air quality prediction,” Information Fusion, vol. 113, p. 102607, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102607.
  18. R. Huang, R. Hu, and H. Chen, “A novel hybrid model for air quality prediction via dimension reduction and error correction techniques,” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, vol. 197, no. 1, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10661-024-13466-5.
  19. X. Chen, Y. Hu, F. Dong, K. Chen, and H. Xia, “A multi-graph spatial-temporal attention network for air-quality prediction,” Process Safety and Environmental Protection, vol. 181, pp. 442–451, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2023.11.040.
  20. T. M. Aruna et al., “Geospatial data for peer-to-peer communication among autonomous vehicles using optimized machine learning algorithm,” Scientific Reports, vol. 14, no. 1, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-71197-6.
  21. A. Thirumalraj, K. Aravinda, E.-S. M. El-Kenawy, and N. Khodadadi, “ScatterNet-based IPOA for predicting violent individuals using real-time drone surveillance system,” Industry 6.0, pp. 182–204, Sep. 2024, doi: 10.1201/9781003517993-8.
  22. M. Elaziz, A. Ewees, M. Al-qaness, S. Alshathri, and R. Ibrahim, “Feature Selection for High Dimensional Datasets Based on Quantum-Based Dwarf Mongoose Optimization,” Mathematics, vol. 10, no. 23, p. 4565, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.3390/math10234565.

CRediT Author Statement


The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows:

Conceptualization: Sivakumaran AR, Cuddapah Anitha, Manjula Arunraj, Ebinezer M D J and Gokila S; Methodology: Sivakumaran AR, Cuddapah Anitha and Manjula Arunraj; Software: Ebinezer M D J, Venkatesh Babu S and Gokila S; Data Curation: Cuddapah Anitha, Manjula Arunraj and Ebinezer M D J; Writing- Original Draft Preparation: Sivakumaran AR, Ebinezer M D J, Venkatesh Babu S and Gokila S; Visualization: Ebinezer M D J, Venkatesh Babu S and Gokila S; Supervision: Ebinezer M D J, Venkatesh Babu S and Gokila S; Writing- Reviewing and Editing: Sivakumaran AR, Cuddapah Anitha and Manjula Arunraj; All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.


Acknowledgements


Authors thank Reviewers for taking the time and effort necessary to review the manuscript.


Funding


No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.


Ethics declarations


Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.


Availability of data and materials


Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study.


Author information


Contributions

All authors have equal contribution in the paper and all authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


Corresponding author


Rights and permissions


Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NoDerivs is a more restrictive license. It allows you to redistribute the material commercially or non-commercially but the user cannot make any changes whatsoever to the original, i.e. no derivatives of the original work. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/


Cite this article


Sivakumaran AR, Cuddapah Anitha, Manjula Arunraj, Ebinezer M.D.J, Venkatesh Babu S and Gokila S, “Mitigating Air Pollution Risks with Deep Learning: A Quantum-Optimized Approach for Nitrogen Dioxide Prediction in Los Angeles”, Journal of Machine and Computing, pp. 709-719, April 2025, doi: 10.53759/7669/jmc202505056.


Copyright


© 2025 Sivakumaran AR, Cuddapah Anitha, Manjula Arunraj, Ebinezer M.D.J, Venkatesh Babu S and Gokila S. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.