HOSNA: Boosting Smart Agriculture Efficiency with the Hybrid Optimization-Based Sensor Node Activation Model
Kavitha V
Department of Data Science and Business Systems, School of Computing, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Department of Data Science and Business Systems, School of Computing, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Smart agriculture leverages Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) to monitor environmental parameters such as soil moisture, temperature, and humidity, enabling precision farming and efficient resource utilization. The Hybrid Optimization-Based Sensor Node Activation (HOSNA) model designed to enhance the efficiency and lifespan of Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN) in smart agriculture applications. HOSNA integrates clustering, energy-efficient activation, hybrid optimization algorithms, and machine learning to optimize sensor node operations while ensuring accurate and real-time environmental monitoring. The model employs Genetic Algorithm (GA) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) to determine optimal sensor activation schedules, reducing energy consumption and prolonging network lifetime. Additionally, a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural network predicts environmental changes, allowing proactive sensor activation. Simulation results demonstrate that HOSNA achieves a 94.0% data accuracy after 1000 operational rounds, surpassing LEACH (90.0%), PEGASIS (86.0%), and Random Duty Cycling (RDC) (70.0%). Energy consumption reduced by 24% compared to LEACH, while network lifetime extended by 32% over PEGASIS. These results highlight HOSNA’s ability to provide reliable, energy-efficient, and scalable solutions for precision agriculture. Future improvements could involve adapting the model for heterogeneous sensor networks and integrating solar-powered nodes for sustainable energy.
K. Raghava Rao, B. Naresh Kumar Reddy, and A. S. Kumar, “Using advanced distributed energy efficient clustering increasing the network lifetime in wireless sensor networks,” Soft Computing, vol. 27, no. 20, pp. 15269–15280, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s00500-023-07940-4.
V. I. Shyja, G. Ranganathan, and V. Bindhu, “Link quality and energy efficient optimal simplified cluster based routing scheme to enhance lifetime for wireless body area networks,” Nano Communication Networks, vol. 37, p. 100465, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.nancom.2023.100465.
H. Helal, F. Sallabi, M. A. Sharaf, S. Harous, M. Hayajneh, and H. Khater, “HCEL: Hybrid Clustering Approach for Extending WBAN Lifetime,” Mathematics, vol. 12, no. 7, p. 1067, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.3390/math12071067.
P. P. Pradhan, V. Revanthkumar, and S. Bhattacharjee, “Energy aware forwarder selection in wireless body area networks to enhance stability and lifetime,” Wireless Networks, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11276-024-03776-4.
Q. Liu and Q. Wang, “An energy efficient on-demand multi-path routing protocol for wireless body area network,” International Journal of Computational Science and Engineering, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 238–247, 2024, doi: 10.1504/ijcse.2024.137294.
I. Abdoulaye, C. Belleudy, L. Rodriguez, and B. Miramond, “Semi-Decentralized Prediction Method for Energy-Efficient Wireless Sensor Networks,” IEEE Sensors Letters, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 1–4, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1109/lsens.2024.3378520.
A. Srivastava and P. K. Mishra, “Fuzzy based multi‐criteria based cluster head selection for enhancing network lifetime and efficient energy consumption,” Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience, vol. 36, no. 4, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1002/cpe.7921.
M. K. Hameed and A. K. Idrees, “Energy-aware scheduling protocol-based hybrid metaheuristic technique to optimize the lifespan in WSNs,” The Journal of Supercomputing, vol. 80, no. 9, pp. 12706–12726, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s11227-024-05921-4.
W.-M. Zheng, N. Liu, Q.-W. Chai, and Y. Liu, “Application of improved black hole algorithm in prolonging the lifetime of wireless sensor network,” Complex & Intelligent Systems, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 5817–5829, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s40747-023-01041-3.
N. Mohd, K. Sharma, S. Salagrama, R. Agrawal, and H. Patil, “Life Span Improvement of Bio Sensors Using Unsupervised Machine Learning for Wireless Body Area Sensor Network,” Revue d’Intelligence Artificielle, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 7–14, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.18280/ria.370102.
N. N. Sulthana and M. Duraipandian, “EELCR: energy efficient lifetime aware cluster based routing technique for wireless sensor networks using optimal clustering and compression,” Telecommunication Systems, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 103–124, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11235-023-01068-4.
S. Haghzad Klidbary and M. Javadian, “Improvement of Low Energy Adaptive Clustering Hierarchical Protocol Based on Genetic Algorithm to Increase Network Lifetime of Wireless Sensor Network,” International Journal of Engineering, vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1800–1811, 2024, doi: 10.5829/ije.2024.37.09c.10.
K. Debasis, L. D. Sharma, V. Bohat, and R. S. Bhadoria, “An Energy-Efficient Clustering Algorithm for Maximizing Lifetime of Wireless Sensor Networks using Machine Learning,” Mobile Networks and Applications, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 853–867, Feb. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11036-023-02109-7.
A. Srivastava and P. K. Mishra, “Load‐Balanced Cluster Head Selection Enhancing Network Lifetime in WSN Using Hybrid Approach for IoT Applications,” Journal of Sensors, vol. 2023, no. 1, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1155/2023/4343404.
Acknowledgements
The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding
No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Availability of data and materials
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study.
Author information
Contributions
All authors have equal contribution in the paper and all authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Prasanna V
Department of Data Science and Business Systems, School of Computing, Faculty of Engineering and Technology, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NoDerivs is a more restrictive license. It allows you to redistribute the material commercially or non-commercially but the user cannot make any changes whatsoever to the original, i.e. no derivatives of the original work. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Cite this article
Kavitha V, Prasanna V, Lekashri S and Venkatesan M, “HOSNA: Boosting Smart Agriculture Efficiency with the Hybrid Optimization-Based Sensor Node Activation Model”, Journal of Machine and Computing. doi: 10.53759/7669/jmc202505040.
