Underwater research and monitoring operations rely significantly on Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) for scientific investigations, resource management, and monitoring, and underwater infrastructure is provided maintenance levels amid other applications. Efficient navigation and preventative methods are only a couple of the numerous challenges that Path-Finding (PF) in rapidly changing and sophisticated Underwater Environments (UE) requires overcoming. Dynamic environments and real-time improvements are problems for traditional models. In order to provide superior solutions for navigating uncertain UE, this work suggests a hybrid optimization technique that combines Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) for local path selection with Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) for global path scheduling. Runtime efficiency, accuracy, and distance focused on decrease are three metrics that demonstrate how the PSO-ACO hybrid method outperforms conventional algorithms, proving its significance for improving AUV navigation. The improvement of AUV functions in fields such as underwater research, along with others, is supported by the current research, which further assists with the invention of Autonomous Underwater Navigation Systems (AUNS). The PSO+ACO hybrid method is superior to the PSO, ACO, and GA algorithms in pathfinding with a 6.43-second execution time and 93.5% accuracy—the ACO model completed in 12.53 seconds, superior to the proposed system.
Keywords
Autonomous Underwater Vehicles, Deep Learning, Ant Colony Optimization, Genetic Algorithms, Accuracy.
S. Watson, D. A. Duecker, and K. Groves, “Localisation of Unmanned Underwater Vehicles (UUVs) in Complex and Confined Environments: A Review,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 21, p. 6203, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.3390/s20216203.
Sharma, R., & Sungheetha, A. (2023). Revolutionizing Underwater Exploration of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs) and Seabed Image Processing Techniques. arXiv e-prints, arXiv-2402.
R. Kot, “Review of Collision Avoidance and Path Planning Algorithms Used in Autonomous Underwater Vehicles,” Electronics, vol. 11, no. 15, p. 2301, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.3390/electronics11152301.
L. Zhao and Y. Bai, “Unlocking the Ocean 6G: A Review of Path-Planning Techniques for Maritime Data Harvesting Assisted by Autonomous Marine Vehicles,” Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 126, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.3390/jmse12010126.
X. Sun, G. Wang, Y. Fan, D. Mu, and B. Qiu, “A Formation Autonomous Navigation System for Unmanned Surface Vehicles With Distributed Control Strategy,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 2834–2845, May 2021, doi: 10.1109/tits.2020.2976567.
M. Juříček, R. Parák, and J. Kůdela, “Evolutionary Computation Techniques for Path Planning Problems in Industrial Robotics: A State-of-the-Art Review,” Computation, vol. 11, no. 12, p. 245, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.3390/computation11120245.
Y. Sun, X. Luo, X. Ran, and G. Zhang, “A 2D Optimal Path Planning Algorithm for Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Driving in Unknown Underwater Canyons,” Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, vol. 9, no. 3, p. 252, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.3390/jmse9030252.
E. Krell, S. A. King, and L. R. Garcia Carrillo, “Autonomous Surface Vehicle energy-efficient and reward-based path planning using Particle Swarm Optimization and Visibility Graphs,” Applied Ocean Research, vol. 122, p. 103125, May 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.apor.2022.103125.
“Optimal Data Collection Path Finding for AUV in Internet of Underwater Things,” International Journal of Intelligent Engineering and Systems, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 827–844, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.22266/ijies2024.0229.69.
Y. Cui, P. Zhu, G. Lei, P. Chen, and G. Yang, “Energy-Efficient Multiple Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Path Planning Scheme in Underwater Sensor Networks,” Electronics, vol. 12, no. 15, p. 3321, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.3390/electronics12153321.
Y. Ma, Z. Mao, T. Wang, J. Qin, W. Ding, and X. Meng, “Obstacle avoidance path planning of unmanned submarine vehicle in ocean current environment based on improved firework-ant colony algorithm,” Computers & Electrical Engineering, vol. 87, p. 106773, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2020.106773.
S. Guo, M. Chen, and W. Pang, “Path Planning for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles Based on an Improved Artificial Jellyfish Search Algorithm in Multi-Obstacle Ocean Current Environment,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 31010–31023, 2023, doi: 10.1109/access.2023.3257025.
H. Gopinath, V. Indu, and M. M. Dharmana, “Autonomous underwater inspection robot under disturbances,” 2017 International Conference on Circuit , Power and Computing Technologies (ICCPCT), Apr. 2017, doi: 10.1109/iccpct.2017.8074222.
K. Sreekala, N. N. Raj, S. Gupta, G. Anitha, A. K. Nanda, and A. Chaturvedi, “Deep convolutional neural network with Kalman filter based objected tracking and detection in underwater communications,” Wireless Networks, Mar. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11276-023-03290-z.
S. Anil and R. Remya, “A hybrid method based on genetic algorithm, self-organised feature map, and support vector machine for better network anomaly detection,” 2013 Fourth International Conference on Computing, Communications and Networking Technologies (ICCCNT), Jul. 2013, doi: 10.1109/icccnt.2013.6726604.
S. Shivkumar, J. Amudha, and A. A. Nippun Kumaar, “Federated deep reinforcement learning for mobile robot navigation,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, pp. 1–16, May 2024, doi: 10.3233/jifs-219428.
A. D. Wanekar, N. Praveen Babu Mannam, and P. Rajalakshmi, “Novel Approach to Underwater Object Detection Using Sonar Sensors for Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUVs),” 2023 International Conference on Sustainable Technology and Engineering (i-COSTE), Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1109/i-coste60462.2023.10500768.
E E. Vidal, N. Palomeras, and M. Carreras, “Online 3D Underwater Exploration and Coverage,” 2018 IEEE/OES Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Workshop (AUV), Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1109/auv.2018.8729736.
G. Indiveri, “Geotechnical Surveys with Cooperative Autonomous Marine Vehicles: the EC WiMUST project,” 2018 IEEE/OES Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Workshop (AUV), Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1109/auv.2018.8729794.
S. Song and S.-C. Yu, “Underwater marking AUV using paraffin wax,” 2016 IEEE/OES Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUV), Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1109/auv.2016.7778716.
V. L. Narla, R. Kachhoria, M. Arun, D. Vijendra Babu, and B. M. Jos, “IoT based energy efficient multipath power control for underwater sensor network,” International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s13198-021-01560-7
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank to the reviewers for nice comments on the manuscript.
Funding
No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Availability of data and materials
Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analysed in this study.
Author information
Contributions
All authors have equal contribution in the paper and all authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Hemalatha P
Hemalatha P
Department of TIFAC-CORE in Cyber Security, Amrita School of Engineering, Coimbatore, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NoDerivs is a more restrictive license. It allows you to redistribute the material commercially or non-commercially but the user cannot make any changes whatsoever to the original, i.e. no derivatives of the original work. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Cite this article
Husam Alowaidi, Hemalatha P, Poongothai K, Sundoss ALmahadeen, Prasath R and Amarendra K, “Improving Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Navigation: Hybrid Swarm Intelligence for Dynamic Marine Environment Path-finding”, Journal of Machine and Computing, pp. 638-650, July 2024. doi: 10.53759/7669/jmc202404061.
