Journal of Machine and Computing


Transfer Driven Ensemble Learning Approach using ROI Pooling CNN For Enhanced Breast Cancer Diagnosis



Journal of Machine and Computing

Received On : 25 December 2022

Revised On : 10 April 2023

Accepted On : 15 May 2023

Published On : 05 July 2023

Volume 03, Issue 03

Pages : 297-311


Abstract


Cancer is a major cause of death that is brought on by the body's abnormal cell proliferation, including breast cancer. It poses a significant threat to the safety and health of people globally. Several imaging methods, such as mammography, CT scans, MRI, ultrasound, and biopsies, can help detect breast cancer. A biopsy is commonly done in histopathology to examine an image and assist in diagnosing breast cancer. However, accurately identifying the appropriate Region of Interest (ROI) remains challenging due to the complex nature of pre-processing phases, feature extracting regions, segmenting process and other conventional machine learning phases. This reduces the system's efficiency and accuracy. In order to reduce the variance that exists among viewers, the aim of this work is to build superior deep-learning phases algorithms. This research introduces a classifier that can detect and classify images simultaneously, without any human involvement. It employs a transfer-driven ensemble learning approach, where the framework comprises two main phases: production and detection of pseudo-color images and segmentation based on ROI Pooling CNN, which then feeds its output to ensemble models such as Efficientnet, ResNet101, and VGG19. Before the feature extraction process, data augmentation is necessary, involving minor adjustments like random cropping, horizontal flipping, and color space augmentations. Implementing and simulating the proposed segmentation and classification algorithms for any decision-making framework suggested could decrease the frequency of incorrect diagnoses and enhance classification accuracy. This could aid pathologists in obtaining a second opinion and facilitate the early identification of diseases. With a prediction accuracy of 98.3%, the proposed method outperforms the individual pre-trained models, namely Efficientnet, ResNet101, VGG16, and VGG19, by 2.3%, 1.71%, 2.01%, and 1.47%, respectively.


Keywords


Ensemble Learning, ROI Pooling CNN, Pseudo-Color Images, Deep Learning, Pathology, Biopsy, Image Classification and Data Augmentation.


  1. Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Laversanne, M.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A.; Bray, F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCANEstimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2021, 71, 209–249.
  2. Albeshan, S.M.; Alashban, Y.I. Incidence Trends of Breast Cancer in Saudi Arabia: A Joinpoint Regression Analysis (2004–2016). J.King Saud Univ. Sci. 2021, 33, 101578.
  3. Sardanelli, F.; Fallenberg, E.M.; Clauser, P.; Trimboli, R.M.; Camps-Herrero, J.; Helbich, T.H.; Forrai, G. Mammography: AnUpdate of the EUSOBI Recommendations on Information for Women. Insights Imaging 2017, 8, 11–18.
  4. Saadatmand, S.; Bretveld, R.; Siesling, S.; Tilanus Linthorst, M.M.A. Influence of Tumour Stage at Breast Cancer Detection onSurvival in Modern Times: Population Based Study in 173,797 Patients. BMJ 2015, 351, h4901.
  5. Dheeba, J.; Albert Singh, N.; Tamil Selvi, S. Computer-Aided Detection of Breast Cancer on Mammograms: A Swarm Intelligence Optimized Wavelet Neural Network Approach. J. Biomed. Inform. 2014, 49, 45–52.
  6. Kolb, T.M.; Lichy, J.; Newhouse, J.H. Comparison of the Performance of Screening Mammography, Physical Examination, andBreast US and Evaluation of Factors That Influence Them: An Analysis of 27,825 Patient Evaluations. Radiology 2002, 225, 165–175.
  7. Bozek, J.; Mustra, M.; Delac, K.; Grgic, M. A Survey of Image Processing Algorithms in Digital Mammography. Stud. Comput.Intell. 2009, 231, 631–657.
  8. Cheng, H.D.; Shi, X.J.; Min, R.; Hu, L.M.; Cai, X.P.; Du, H.N. Approaches for Automated Detection and Classification of Masses inMammograms. Pattern Recognit. 2006, 39, 646–668.
  9. Anaya-Isaza, A.; Mera-Jiménez, L.; Zequera-Diaz, M. An Overview of Deep Learning in Medical Imaging. Inform. Med. Unlocked2021, 26, 100723.
  10. Khan, U.; Khan, S.; Rizwan, A.; Atteia, G.; Jamjoom, M.M.; Samee, N.A. Aggression Detection in Social Media from Textual DataUsing Deep Learning Models. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 5083.
  11. Samee, N.A.; Atteia, G.; Alkanhel, R.; Alhussan, A.A.; AlEisa, H.N. Hybrid Feature Reduction Using PCC-Stacked Autoencodersfor Gold/Oil Prices Forecasting under COVID-19 Pandemic. Electronics 2022, 11, 991.
  12. Jing, B.; Zhang, T.; Wang, Z.; Jin, Y.; Liu, K.; Qiu, W.; Ke, L.; Sun, Y.; He, C.; Hou, D.; et al. A deep survival analysis method basedon ranking. Artif. Intell. Med. 2019, 98, 1–9.
  13. Bychkov, D.; Linder, N.; Turkki, R.; Nordling, S.; Kovanen, P.E.; Verrill, C.;Walliander, M.; Lundin, M.; Haglund, C.; Lundin, J.Deep learning based tissue analysis predicts outcome in colorectal cancer. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 3395.
  14. Katzman, J.L.; Shaham, U.; Cloninger, A.; Bates, J.; Jiang, T.; Kluger, Y. DeepSurv: Personalized treatment recommender systemusing a Cox proportional hazards deep neural network. BMC Med. Res. Methodol. 2018, 18, 24.
  15. Alanazi, S.A.; Kamruzzaman, M.M.; Sarker, N.I.; Alruwaili, M.; Alhwaiti, Y.; Alshammari, N.; Siddiqi, M.H. Boosting breastcancer detection using convolutional neural network. J. Healthc. Eng. 2021, 2021, 5528622.
  16. Kather, J.N.; Krisam, J.; Charoentong, P.; Luedde, T.; Herpel, E.;Weis, C.-A.; Gaiser, T.; Marx, A.; Valous, N.A.; Ferber, D.; et al.Predicting survival from colorectal cancer histology slides using deep learning: A retrospective multicenter study. PLoS Med.2019, 16, e1002730. 17.
  17. Korfiatis, P.; Kline, T.L.; Lachance, D.H.; Parney, I.F.; Buckner, J.C.; Erickson, B.J. Residual deep convolutional neural networkpredicts MGMT methylation status. J. Digit. Imaging 2017, 30, 622–628.
  18. Yogapriya, J., Saravanabhavan, C., Asokan, R., Vennila, I., Preethi, P., &Nithya, B. (2018). A study of image retrieval system based on feature extraction, selection, classification and similarity measurements. Journal of Medical Imaging and Health Informatics, 8(3), 479-484.
  19. Zhou, L. Q., Wu, X. L., Huang, S. Y., Wu, G. G., Ye, H. R., Wei, Q., ... & Dietrich, C. F. (2020). Lymph node metastasis prediction from primary breast cancer US images using deep learning. Radiology, 294(1), 19-28.
  20. Anandakumar Haldorai, Shrinand Anandakumar, “Motivation, Definition, Application and the Future of meu ip Edge Artificial Intelligence", vol.2, no.3, pp. 077-087, July 2022. doi: 10.53759/181X/JCNS202202011.
  21. Charan, S.; Khan, M.J.; Khurshid, K. Breast cancer detection in mammograms using convolutional neural network. In Proceedingsof the 2018 International Conference on Computing, Mathematics and Engineering Technologies (iCoMET),Wuhan, China, 7–8February 2018; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2018.
  22. Hussain, Z.; Gimenez, F.; Yi, D.; Rubin, D. Differential data augmentation techniques for medical imaging classification tasks.AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc. Arch. 2017, 2017, 979–984.
  23. Falconi, L.G.; Perez, M.; Aguila, W.G.; Conci, A. Transfer learning and fine tuning in breast mammogram abnormalitiesclassification on CBIS-DDSM database. Adv. Sci. Technol. Eng. Syst. J. 2020, 5, 154–165.
  24. Eldin, S.N.; Hamdy, J.K.; Adnan, G.T.; Hossam, M.; Elmasry, N.; Mohammed, A. Deep Learning Approach for Breast CancerDiagnosis from Microscopy Biopsy Images. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Mobile, Intelligent, and UbiquitousComputing Conference (MIUCC), Cairo, Egypt, 26–27 May 2021; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2021.
  25. Siddeeq, S.; Li, J.; Ali Bhatti, H.M.; Manzoor, A.; Malhi, U.S. Deep Learning RN-BCNN Model for Breast Cancer BI-RADSClassification. In Proceedings of the 2021 The 4th International Conference on Image and Graphics Processing, Sanya, China, 1–3January 2021.
  26. Shaikh, K.; Krishnan, S.; Thanki, R. Deep Learning Model for Classification of Breast Cancer, in Artificial Intelligence in Breast CancerEarly Detection and Diagnosis; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2021; pp. 93–100.
  27. Salvi, S.; Kadam, A. Breast Cancer Detection Using Deep learning and IoT Technologies. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021,1831, 012030.
  28. Sun,W.; Tseng, T.-L.B.; Zhang, J.; Qian,W. Enhancing deep convolutional neural network scheme for breast cancer diagnosiswith unlabeled data. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 2017, 57, 4–9.
  29. Roy, K.; Banik, D.; Bhattacharjee, D.; Nasipuri, M. Patch-based system for classification of breast histology images using deeplearning. Comput. Med. Imaging Graph. 2019, 71, 90–103.
  30. Alanazi, S.A.; Kamruzzaman, M.M.; Sarker, N.I.; Alruwaili, M.; Alhwaiti, Y.; Alshammari, N.; Siddiqi, M.H. Boosting breastcancer detection using convolutional neural network. J. Healthc. Eng. 2021, 2021, 5528622.
  31. Singh, S.; Matthews, T.P.; Shah, M.; Mombourquette, B.; Tsue, T.; Long, A.; Almohsen, R.; Pedemonte, S.; Su, J. Adaptation of adeep learning malignancy model from full-field digital mammography to digital breast tomosynthesis. In Proceedings of theMedical Imaging 2020: Computer-Aided Diagnosis, Houston, TX, USA, 15–20 February 2020; International Society for Optics andPhotonics: Bellingham,WA, USA, 2020.
  32. Mendel, K.; Li, H.; Sheth, D.; Giger, M. Transfer learning from convolutional neural networks for computer-aided diagnosis: Acomparison of digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography. Acad. Radiol. 2019, 26, 735–743.
  33. Rodriguez-Ruiz, A.; Teuwen, J.; Vreemann, S.; Bouwman, R.W.; E Van Engen, R.; Karssemeijer, N.; Mann, R.; Gubern-Merida, A.;Sechopoulos, I. New reconstruction algorithm for digital breast tomosynthesis: Better image quality for humans and computers.ActaRadiol. 2018, 59, 1051–1059.
  34. Yousefi, M.; Krzyz˙ak, A.; Suen, C.Y. Mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis data using convolutional neural networks andmultiple instance learning. Comput. Biol. Med. 2018, 96, 283–293.
  35. Siddeeq, S.; Li, J.; Ali Bhatti, H.M.; Manzoor, A.; Malhi, U.S. Deep Learning RN-BCNN Model for Breast Cancer BI-RADSClassification. In Proceedings of the 2021 The 4th International Conference on Image and Graphics Processing, Sanya, China, 1–3January 2021.

Acknowledgements


Authors thank Reviewers for taking the time and effort necessary to review the manuscript.


Funding


No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.


Ethics declarations


Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.


Availability of data and materials


No data available for above study.


Author information


Contributions

All authors have equal contribution in the paper and all authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


Corresponding author


Rights and permissions


Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NoDerivs is a more restrictive license. It allows you to redistribute the material commercially or non-commercially but the user cannot make any changes whatsoever to the original, i.e. no derivatives of the original work. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/


Cite this article


Preethi P, Yogapriya J, Nivetha L and R.Madanachitran, “Transfer Driven Ensemble Learning Approach using ROI Pooling CNN For Enhanced Breast Cancer Diagnosis, Journal of Machine and Computing, vol.3, no.3, pp. 297-311, July 2023. doi: 10.53759/7669/jmc202303026.


Copyright


© 2023 Preethi P, Yogapriya J, Nivetha L and R.Madanachitran. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.