Journal of Computational Intelligence in Materials Science


Computational Intelligence Paradigms in Product Design Engineering: A Comprehensive Review



Journal of Computational Intelligence in Materials Science

Received On : 24 October 2023

Revised On : 25 January 2024

Accepted On : 27 February 2024

Published On : 16 March 2024

Volume 02, 2024

Pages : 047-058


Abstract


Computational Intelligence (CI) models are established from biological paradigms and purpose to address complex challenges. Probabilistic methodologies and soft computing, which incorporate various models of CI, are typically employed in the domain of CI. Ontologies are fundamental in product design engineering process since they provide a common basis for incorporating various information sources. This research reviews five major models of CI: artificial intelligence, artificial neural networks, artificial immune systems, swarm intelligence, and evolutionary computation. The paper discusses the origins and applications of every paradigm, as well as its application in product design engineering. The study also reviews the functions of ontologies in the incorporation of information sources and facilitation of smart algorithms and techniques in the domain of product design engineering. In addition, it assesses the application of data mining, case-based reasoning, decision-making algorithms, hybrid techniques, qualitative reasoning, and process modeling in product design engineering. This article ends with an examination of modification, differentiation, customization, development, and building of process models within the field of product design engineering. It also reviews how CI approaches may be employed in addressing unique process challenges.


Keywords


Swarm Intelligence, Computational Intelligence, Fuzzy Systems, Artificial Neural Networks, Evolutionary Computing, Artificial Immune Systems.


  1. H. Millward and A. Lewis, “Barriers to successful new product development within small manufacturing companies,” Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 379–394, Sep. 2005, doi: 10.1108/14626000510612295.
  2. B. Kim, S. Joines, and J. Feng, “Technology-driven design process: teaching and mentoring technology-driven design process in industrial design education,” International Journal of Technology and Design Education, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 521–555, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10798-022-09739-0.
  3. A. Hızıroğlu, “Soft computing applications in customer segmentation: State-of-art review and critique,” Expert Systems With Applications, vol. 40, no. 16, pp. 6491–6507, Nov. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.05.052.
  4. S. Sattler, “The role of the immune system beyond the fight against infection,” in Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 2017, pp. 3–14. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-57613-8_1.
  5. G. L. Ada and G. J. V. Nossal, “The Clonal-Selection Theory,” Scientific American, vol. 257, no. 2, pp. 62–69, Aug. 1987, doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0887-62.
  6. U. Aickelin and S. Cayzer, “The danger theory and its application to artificial immune systems,” arXiv (Cornell University), Jan. 2002, [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/pdf/0801.3549
  7. J. Nk, “Towards a network theory of the immune system.,” PubMed, vol. 125C, no. 1–2, pp. 373–89, Jan. 1974, [Online]. Available: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4142565
  8. F. Ruíz and J. R. Hilera, “Using ontologies in software engineering and technology,” in Springer eBooks, 2006, pp. 49–102. doi: 10.1007/3-540-34518-3_2.
  9. M. Yoshioka, Y. Umeda, H. Takeda, Y. Shimomura, Y. Nomaguchi, and T. Tomiyama, “Physical concept ontology for the knowledge intensive engineering framework,” Advanced Engineering Informatics, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 95–113, Apr. 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2004.09.004.
  10. B. J. Wielinga, A. T. Schreiber, and J. Breuker, “KADS: a modelling approach to knowledge engineering,” Knowledge Acquisition, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 5–53, Mar. 1992, doi: 10.1016/1042-8143(92)90013-q.
  11. S. K. Moon, T. W. Simpson, J. Shu, and S. Kumara, “Service representation for capturing and reusing design knowledge in product and service families using object-oriented concepts and an ontology,” Journal of Engineering Design, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 413–431, Aug. 2009, doi: 10.1080/09544820903151723.
  12. N. K. Kakabadse, A. Kouzmin, and A. Kakabadse, “From tacit knowledge to knowledge management: leveraging invisible assets,” Knowledge and Process Management, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 137–154, Jan. 2001, doi: 10.1002/kpm.120.
  13. L. Ding, P. Kolari, Z. Ding, and S. Avancha, “Using Ontologies in the Semantic Web: A survey,” in Springer eBooks, 2007, pp. 79–113. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-37022-4_4.
  14. C. Huang, A. J. C. Trappey, and Y. Yao, “Developing an agent‐based workflow management system for collaborative product design,” Industrial Management and Data Systems, vol. 106, no. 5, pp. 680–699, Jun. 2006, doi: 10.1108/02635570610666449.
  15. I. Jurišica, J. Mylopoulos, and E. Yu, “Ontologies for Knowledge Management: An Information Systems Perspective,” Knowledge and Information Systems, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 380–401, Jul. 2004, doi: 10.1007/s10115-003-0135-4.
  16. J. Wang, Y. Ma, L. Zhang, R. X. Gao, and D. Wu, “Deep learning for smart manufacturing: Methods and applications,” Journal of Manufacturing Systems, vol. 48, pp. 144–156, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.01.003.
  17. M. Bansal and Priya, “Machine Learning perspective in VLSI Computer-Aided Design at different abstraction levels,” in Lecture notes on data engineering and communications technologies, 2021, pp. 95–112. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-1866-6_6.
  18. I. Goncharenko, V. V. Kryssanov, and H. Tamaki, “An agent-based approach for collecting and utilizing design information throughout the product life cycle,” 1999 7th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation. Proceedings ETFA ’99 (Cat. No.99TH8467), Jan. 2003, doi: 10.1109/etfa.1999.815353.
  19. A.-T. W. K. Fahmi, K. R. Kashyzadeh, and S. Ghorbani, “A comprehensive review on mechanical failures cause vibration in the gas turbine of combined cycle power plants,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 134, p. 106094, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106094.
  20. D. Delen, H. Zaim, C. Kuzey, and S. Zaim, “A comparative analysis of machine learning systems for measuring the impact of knowledge management practices,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 1150–1160, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2012.10.040.
  21. G. La Rocca, “Knowledge based engineering: Between AI and CAD. Review of a language based technology to support engineering design,” Advanced Engineering Informatics, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 159–179, Apr. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.aei.2012.02.002.
  22. Y. Liou and M. Chen, “USING COLLABORATIVE TECHNOLOGY FOR TRIZ INNOVATION METHODOLOGY,” Int. J. Electron. Bus. Manag., vol. 9, pp. 12–23, Jan. 2011, [Online]. Available: https://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/journals/ijebm/ijebm9.html#LiouC11.
  23. J. H. Holland, “Genetic algorithms,” Scientific American, vol. 267, no. 1, pp. 66–72, Jul. 1992, doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0792-66.
  24. J. R. Koza, “Genetic programming as a means for programming computers by natural selection,” Statistics and Computing, vol. 4, no. 2, Jun. 1994, doi: 10.1007/bf00175355.
  25. K. A. Juste, H. Kita, E. Tanaka, and J. Hasegawa, “An evolutionary programming solution to the unit commitment problem,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 1452–1459, Jan. 1999, doi: 10.1109/59.801925.
  26. R. T. Griffin, M. J. Winfield, and S. S. Douglas, “Bearing selection using a knowledge based system,” in Tribology series, 1989, pp. 489–493. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8922(08)70227-x.
  27. A. Van Der Gaag, R. Jago, A. Gallagher, K. Stathis, M. Webster, and Z. Austin, “Artificial intelligence in Health Professions Regulation: An exploratory qualitative study of nurse regulators in three jurisdictions,” Journal of Nursing Regulation, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 10–17, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.1016/s2155-8256(23)00087-x.
  28. Y. Gal, B. J. Grosz, S. Kraus, A. Pfeffer, and S. M. Shieber, “Agent decision-making in open mixed networks,” Artificial Intelligence, vol. 174, no. 18, pp. 1460–1480, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.artint.2010.09.002.
  29. F. Bousquet and C. L. Page, “Multi-agent simulations and ecosystem management: a review,” Ecological Modelling, vol. 176, no. 3–4, pp. 313–332, Sep. 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.01.011.
  30. A. Aliahmadi, S. J. Sadjadi, and M. Jafari-Eskandari, “Design a new intelligence expert decision making using game theory and fuzzy AHP to risk management in design, construction, and operation of tunnel projects (case studies: Resalat tunnel),” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 53, no. 5–8, pp. 789–798, Aug. 2010, doi: 10.1007/s00170-010-2852-7.
  31. B. Bartsch-Spörl, M. Lenz, and A. Hübner, “Case-Based Reasoning – survey and future directions,” in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 1999, pp. 67–89. doi: 10.1007/10703016_4.
  32. A. Aamodt and E. Plaza, “Case-Based reasoning: foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches,” Ai Communications, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 39–59, Jan. 1994, doi: 10.3233/aic-1994-7104.
  33. I. Bichindaritz, “Memory Structures and Organization in Case-Based Reasoning,” in Studies in computational intelligence, 2008, pp. 175–194. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-73180-1_6.
  34. L. Lamontagne and E. Plaza, Case-Based Reasoning Research and development. 2016. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-47096-2.
  35. M. Itkonen, K. Ekman, and I. Kojo, “Murjottelu – interdisciplinary training campaign for industrial design and engineering students,” European Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 263–271, Jun. 2009, doi: 10.1080/03043790903038858.
  36. P. M. Frank, “Analytical and qualitative model-based fault diagnosis – a survey and some new results,” European Journal of Control, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 6–28, Jan. 1996, doi: 10.1016/s0947-3580(96)70024-9.
  37. H. Cheong, G. M. Hallihan, and L. H. Shu, “Understanding Analogical Reasoning in Biomimetic Design: an Inductive approach,” in Springer eBooks, 2014, pp. 21–39. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-9112-0_2.
  38. P. A. Wałęga, M. Zawidzki, and T. Lechowski, “Qualitative Physics in <italic>Angry Birds</italic>,” IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 152–165, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1109/tciaig.2016.2561080.
  39. R. D. Sriram, Intelligent Systems for Engineering: a knowledge-based approach. 2012. [Online]. Available: http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA32026755
  40. M. S. Abdullah, C. Kimble, R. F. Paige, I. Benest, and A. Evans, “Developing a UML profile for modelling Knowledge-Based Systems,” in Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2005, pp. 220–233. doi: 10.1007/11538097_15.
  41. S. B. Tor, G. A. Britton, and W. Zhang, “Development of an object-oriented blackboard model for stamping process planning in progressive die design,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, vol. 16, no. 4–5, pp. 499–513, Oct. 2005, doi: 10.1007/s10845-005-1660-7.
  42. S. Datta and P. Chattopadhyay, “Soft computing techniques in advancement of structural metals,” International Materials Reviews, vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 475–504, Nov. 2013, doi: 10.1179/1743280413y.0000000021.
  43. A. Dineva et al., “Review of soft computing models in design and control of rotating electrical machines,” Energies, vol. 12, no. 6, p. 1049, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.3390/en12061049.
  44. M. Dam and D. N. Saraf, “Design of neural networks using genetic algorithm for on-line property estimation of crude fractionator products,” Computers & Chemical Engineering, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 722–729, Feb. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.compchemeng.2005.12.001.
  45. T.-S. Li and H.-H. Huang, “RETRACTED: Applying TRIZ and Fuzzy AHP to develop innovative design for automated manufacturing systems,” Expert Systems With Applications, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 8302–8312, May 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2008.10.025.
  46. T. W. Simpson, “Methods for optimizing product platforms and product families,” in Springer eBooks, 2006, pp. 133–156. doi: 10.1007/0-387-29197-0_8.
  47. A. Kusiak and F. A. Salustri, “Computational intelligence in Product Design Engineering: Review and Trends,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 766–778, Sep. 2007, doi: 10.1109/tsmcc.2007.900669.

Acknowledgements


Authors thank Reviewers for taking the time and effort necessary to review the manuscript.


Funding


No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.


Ethics declarations


Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.


Availability of data and materials


No data available for above study.


Author information


Contributions

All authors have equal contribution in the paper and all authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


Corresponding author


Rights and permissions


Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NoDerivs is a more restrictive license. It allows you to redistribute the material commercially or non-commercially but the user cannot make any changes whatsoever to the original, i.e. no derivatives of the original work. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/


Cite this article


Atuha Digina Simon, “Computational Intelligence Paradigms in Product Design Engineering: A Comprehensive Review”, Journal of Computational Intelligence in Materials Science, vol.2, pp. 047-058, 2024. doi: 10.53759/832X/JCIMS202402005.


Copyright


© 2024 Atuha Digina Simon. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.