Journal of Biomedical and Sustainable Healthcare Applications


Advances and Challenges in Closed Loop Therapeutics: From Signal Selection to Optogenetic Techniques



Journal of Biomedical and Sustainable Healthcare Applications

Received On : 02 October 2022

Revised On : 12 July 2023

Accepted On : 29 September 2023

Published On : 05 January 2024

Volume 04, Issue 01

Pages : 073-083


Abstract


The main objective of this paper is to develop closed-loop therapeutic systems by reviewing various neurological disorders. We propose a system that incorporates a biosensor, controller, and infusion pump to provide closed-loop feedback management of medicine delivery. To address the specific therapeutic requirements of a medication called Dox, they made precise adjustments to the system's functioning. The device incorporates a biosensor capable of real-time assessment of medicine levels in the bloodstream. The method utilizes aptamer probes that have been labeled with an electrochemical tag. When these probes connect to the drug target, they undergo a reversible change in shape, leading to a modification in redox current. A little quantity of blood is consistently extracted from the animal's circulatory system inside a microfluidic device, which is used for this measurement. The paper examines the challenges of seizure detection and the use of advanced learning algorithms and classification methods to enhance real- time seizure detection in closed-loop systems. Following the successful use of optogenetic techniques in epilepsy models, the authors discuss the potential of these technologies for controlling brain activity.


Keywords


Closed Loop Infusion Control System, Biosensor, Proportional Integral Derivative Feedback Algorithm, Infusion Pump, Closed Loop Therapeutics, Electrophysiological Signals.


  1. A. D. Mickle et al., “A wireless closed-loop system for optogenetic peripheral neuromodulation,” Nature, vol. 565, no. 7739, pp. 361–365, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0823-6.
  2. M. J. Khodaei, N. Candelino, A. Mehrvarz, and N. Jalili, “Physiological Closed-Loop Control (PCLC) Systems: Review of a modern frontier in automation,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 23965–24005, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1109/access.2020.2968440.
  3. A. K. H. Cheng, D. Sen, and H.-Z. Yu, “Design and testing of aptamer-based electrochemical biosensors for proteins and small molecules,” Bioelectrochemistry, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 1–12, Nov. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.bioelechem.2009.04.007.
  4. R. E. Nicoletto and C. M. Ofner, “Cytotoxic mechanisms of doxorubicin at clinically relevant concentrations in breast cancer cells,” Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 285–311, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s00280-022-04400-y.
  5. Y. Du, B. Li, H. Wei, Y. Wang, and E. Wang, “Multifunctional Label-Free electrochemical biosensor based on an integrated aptamer,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 80, no. 13, pp. 5110–5117, Jun. 2008, doi: 10.1021/ac800303c.
  6. S. Ghosh‐Dastidar and H. Adeli, “A new supervised learning algorithm for multiple spiking neural networks with application in epilepsy and seizure detection,” Neural Networks, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. 1419–1431, Dec. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2009.04.003.
  7. A. Fertonani and C. Miniussi, “Transcranial electrical stimulation,” The Neuroscientist, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 109–123, Jul. 2016, doi:10.1177/1073858416631966.
  8. E. J. Fox and R. Melzack, “Transcutaneous electrical stimulation and acupuncture: Comparison of treatment for low-back pain,” PAIN, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 141–148, Jun. 1976, doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(76)90109-3.
  9. D. Misir, H. Malki, and G. Chen, “Design and analysis of a fuzzy proportional-integral-derivative controller,” Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol.79, no. 3, pp. 297–314, May 1996, doi: 10.1016/0165-0114(95)00149-2.
  10. S. Ibsen et al., “Localized in vivo activation of a photoactivatable doxorubicin prodrug in deep tumor tissue,” Photochemistry and Photobiology, vol. 89, no. 3, pp. 698–708, Mar. 2013, doi: 10.1111/php.12045.
  11. J. P. Cunningham, P. Nuyujukian, V. Gilja, C. A. Chestek, S. I. Ryu, and K. V. Shenoy, “A closed-loop human simulator for investigating the role of feedback control in brain-machine interfaces,” Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 105, no. 4, pp. 1932–1949, Apr. 2011, doi:10.1152/jn.00503.2010.
  12. F. Fröhlich and L. Townsend, “Closed-Loop transcranial alternating current stimulation: towards personalized non-invasive brain stimulation for the treatment of psychiatric illnesses,” Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 51–57, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s40473-021-00227-8.
  13. T. Wichmann, H. Bergman, and M. R. DeLong, “Basal ganglia, movement disorders and deep brain stimulation: advances made through non-human primate research,” Journal of Neural Transmission, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 419–430, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1007/s00702-017-1736-5.
  14. H. Supèr and P. R. Roelfsema, “Chronic multiunit recordings in behaving animals: advantages and limitations,” in Progress in Brain Research,2005, pp. 263–282. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6123(04)47020-4.
  15. N. S. Jangwan et al., “Brain augmentation and neuroscience technologies: current applications, challenges, ethics and future prospects,” Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, vol. 16, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2022.1000495.
  16. I. Jones, P. Livi, M. Lewandowska, M. Fiscella, B. Roscic, and A. Hierlemann, “The potential of microelectrode arrays and microelectronics for biomedical research and diagnostics,” Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, vol. 399, no. 7, pp. 2313–2329, Jul. 2010, doi:10.1007/s00216-010-3968-1.
  17. S. Sadaghiani, M. J. Brookes, and S. Baillet, “Connectomics of human electrophysiology,” NeuroImage, vol. 247, p. 118788, Feb. 2022, doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118788.
  18. J. D. West, L. Lacasa, S. Severini, and A. E. Teschendorff, “Approximate entropy of network parameters,” Physical Review E, vol. 85, no. 4, Apr. 2012, doi: 10.1103/physreve.85.046111.
  19. R. Bhavsar, N. Helian, Y. Sun, N. Davey, T. Steffert, and D. Mayor, “Efficient methods for calculating sample entropy in time series data analysis,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 145, pp. 97–104, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2018.11.016.
  20. L. Lü and F. Chu, “Approximate entropy as acoustic emission feature parametric data for crack detection,” Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation, vol. 26, no. 02, pp. 119–128, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.1080/10589759.2010.521825.
  21. M. Sabeti, S. D. Katebi, and R. Boostani, “Entropy and complexity measures for EEG signal classification of schizophrenic and control participants,” Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 263–274, Nov. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2009.03.003.
  22. A. M. A. Mohamed, O. N. Uçan, O. Bayat, and A. D. Duru, “Classification of Resting-State status based on sample entropy and power spectrum of electroencephalography (EEG),” Applied Bionics and Biomechanics, vol. 2020, pp. 1–10, Nov. 2020, doi:10.1155/2020/8853238.
  23. A. Shoeibi et al., “An overview of deep learning techniques for epileptic seizures detection and prediction based on neuroimaging modalities:Methods, challenges, and future works,” Computers in Biology and Medicine, vol. 149, p. 106053, Oct. 2022, doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106053.
  24. B. Lee et al., “A Single-Center Experience with the NeuroPace RNS System: A Review of Techniques and Potential Problems,” World Neurosurgery, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 719–726, Sep. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.04.050.
  25. F. Pulvermüller, “Neurobiological mechanisms for language, symbols and concepts: Clues from brain-constrained deep neural networks,” Progress in Neurobiology, vol. 230, p. 102511, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2023.102511.
  26. F. Yavari, A. Jamil, M. Mosayebi-Samani, L. P. Vidor, and M. A. Nitsche, “Basic and functional effects of transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES)—An introduction,” Neuroscience &Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 85, pp. 81–92, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.06.015.
  27. D. Pinault, “A Neurophysiological Perspective on a Preventive Treatment against Schizophrenia Using Transcranial Electric Stimulation of the Corticothalamic Pathway,” Brain Sciences, vol. 7, no. 12, p. 34, Mar. 2017, doi:10.3390/brainsci7040034.

Acknowledgements


The authors would like to thank to the reviewers for nice comments on the manuscript.


Funding


No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.


Ethics declarations


Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.


Availability of data and materials


No data available for above study.


Author information


Contributions

All authors have equal contribution in the paper and all authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


Corresponding author


Rights and permissions


Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NoDerivs is a more restrictive license. It allows you to redistribute the material commercially or non-commercially but the user cannot make any changes whatsoever to the original, i.e. no derivatives of the original work. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/


Cite this article


Francisco Pedro, “Advances and Challenges in Closed Loop Therapeutics: From Signal Selection to Optogenetic Techniques”, Journal of Biomedical and Sustainable Healthcare Applications, vol.4, no.1, pp. 073-083, January 2024. doi: 10.53759/0088/JBSHA20240408.


Copyright


© 2024 Francisco Pedro. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.