Journal of Enterprise and Business Intelligence


The Effect of Technology Transfers on Productivity Increment in Japanese Overseas Manufacturing



Journal of Enterprise and Business Intelligence

Received On : 20 February 2024

Revised On : 10 March 2024

Accepted On : 26 March 2024

Published On : 05 July 2024

Volume 04, Issue 03

Pages : 166-173


Abstract


Technological innovation and technology transfer play an important role in enhancing the productivity of MNEs, especially the Japanese overseas manufacturing subsidiaries. The purpose of this study is to examine the association between R&D cost, technology purchase, and total factor productivity change and regression models with the survey data of Japanese Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry on Overseas Business Activities conducted over 2021-2023. Basic and Trend Surveys were combined to create a sample of 1,798 affiliates across 38 countries with variables such as R&D spending, Technology Transfer payments, capital stock growth, and employment growth. The evidence presented suggests that both technology and R&D payments enhance productivity improvement for the company, and the estimated returns on R&D investments is 0.54 Yen (JPY) for every JPY spent and technology transfer payments 0.76 JPY. The regression results also show a synergistic relationship between technology and R&D payments indicating that affiliates involved in both processes report higher levels of efficiency. In addition, the study also focuses on geographical specialization of technology transfer and R&D in industries including chemicals, pharmaceuticals, and machinery, where major expenditure on R&D is done across the globe and particularly in United States and in Europe.


Keywords


Research and Development Activities, Technology Transfer, Oversee Manufacturing Affiliates, R&D Expenditures, Technology Transfer Payments.


  1. A. M. Rugman and A. Verbeke, “A perspective on regional and global strategies of multinational enterprises,” Journal of International Business Studies, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 3–18, Jan. 2004, doi: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400073.
  2. I. Shaikh and K. Randhawa, “Managing the risks and motivations of technology managers in open innovation: Bringing stakeholder-centric corporate governance into focus,” Technovation, vol. 114, p. 102437, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102437.
  3. C. S. Galbraith, “Transferring core manufacturing technologies in High-Technology firms,” California Management Review, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 56–70, Jul. 1990, doi: 10.2307/41166628.
  4. S. Young and P. Lan, “Technology Transfer to China through Foreign Direct Investment,” Regional Studies, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 669–679, Oct. 1997, doi: 10.1080/00343409750130759.
  5. M. I. Kafouros, P. J. Buckley, and J. Clegg, “The effects of global knowledge reservoirs on the productivity of multinational enterprises: The role of international depth and breadth,” Research Policy, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 848–861, Mar. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.007.
  6. D. Kang, W. Jang, Y. Kim, and J. Jeon, “Comparing National Innovation System among the USA, Japan, and Finland to Improve Korean Deliberation Organization for National Science and Technology Policy,” Journal of Open Innovation Technology Market and Complexity, vol. 5, no. 4, p. 82, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.3390/joitmc5040082.
  7. A. Arimoto, T. Daizen, and F. Huang, “Changing Policies of Research, Development, and Innovation and the Characteristics of Academics in Japan,” Universities in the Knowledge Society, pp. 123–144, 2021, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-76579-8_8.
  8. J. I. Bulow, J. D. Geanakoplos, and P. D. Klemperer, “Multimarket Oligopoly: Strategic Substitutes and Complements,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 93, no. 3, pp. 488–511, Jun. 1985, doi: 10.1086/261312.
  9. C. Grimpe and U. Kaiser, “Balancing Internal and External Knowledge Acquisition: The Gains and Pains from R&D Outsourcing,” Journal of Management Studies, vol. 47, no. 8, pp. 1483–1509, Apr. 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00946.x.
  10. Y. Duan et al., “Unveiling the impacts of explicit vs. tacit knowledge hiding on innovation quality: The moderating role of knowledge flow within a firm,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 139, pp. 1489–1500, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.068.
  11. S. Hena, S. U. Khan, B. Cui, S. Khan, D. Zhang, and Z. Cheng, “Synergistic effects of technology and native aptitude in the perspective of industrial transfer for sustainable development in emerging economies,” Environment Development and Sustainability, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 14927–14951, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s10668-022-02696-7.
  12. J. Hagedoorn and N. Wang, “Is there complementarity or substitutability between internal and external R&D strategies?,” Research Policy, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 1072–1083, Jul. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.012.
  13. S. Roper and N. Hewitt-Dundas, “Knowledge stocks, knowledge flows and innovation: Evidence from matched patents and innovation panel data,” Research Policy, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 1327–1340, May 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.03.003.
  14. W. T. Lin and B. Shao, “Assessing the input effect on productive efficiency in production systems: the value of information technology capital,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 44, no. 9, pp. 1799–1819, Feb. 2006, doi: 10.1080/00207540500353889.
  15. R. C. M. Yam, W. Lo, E. P. Y. Tang, and A. K. W. Lau, “Analysis of sources of innovation, technological innovation capabilities, and performance: An empirical study of Hong Kong manufacturing industries,” Research Policy, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 391–402, Nov. 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.10.013.
  16. R. Sankaranarayanan, K. S. Umadevi, N. Bhavani, B. M. Jos, A. Haldorai, and D. V. Babu, “Cluster-based attacks prevention algorithm for autonomous vehicles using machine learning algorithms,” Computers and Electrical Engineering, vol. 101, p. 108088, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2022.108088.
  17. A. J. Glass and K. Saggi, “International technology transfer and the technology gap,” Journal of Development Economics, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 369–398, Apr. 1998, doi: 10.1016/s0304-3878(98)00041-8.
  18. L. Jarle Gressgård, O. Amundsen, T. Merethe Aasen, and K. Hansen, “Use of information and communication technology to support employee-driven innovation in organizations: a knowledge management perspective,” Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 633–650, Jul. 2014, doi: 10.1108/jkm-01-2014-0013.

Acknowledgements


Authors thanks to School of Management, Tokyo University of Science for this research support.


Funding


No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.


Ethics declarations


Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.


Availability of data and materials


No data available for above study.


Author information


Contributions

All authors have equal contribution in the paper and all authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


Corresponding author


Rights and permissions


Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NoDerivs is a more restrictive license. It allows you to redistribute the material commercially or non-commercially but the user cannot make any changes whatsoever to the original, i.e. no derivatives of the original work. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/


Cite this article


Akemi Miyuki, “The Effect of Technology Transfers on Productivity Increment in Japanese Overseas Manufacturing”, Journal of Enterprise and Business Intelligence, vol.4, no.3, pp. 166-173, July 2024. doi: 10.53759/5181/JEBI202404017.


Copyright


© 2024 Akemi Miyuki. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.