Journal of Enterprise and Business Intelligence


Risk Perception Disparities in E-Business: Analyzing SME Roles, Experience and Legal Compliance Challenges



Journal of Enterprise and Business Intelligence

Received On : 20 February 2024

Revised On : 18 March 2024

Accepted On : 30 March 2024

Published On : 05 July 2024

Volume 04, Issue 03

Pages : 146-155


Abstract


This study examines how e-business experience and organizational roles impact on the perception of dependency risks including external service provider risks, legal and compliance risks, and security risks among SMEs. Thus, the first research objective is to examine how and to what extent general and specific e-business experience influence the perceived risks and their priorities. In the present research, a mixed research approach and Kruskal-Wallis test were adopted to compare the risk perception of the respondents. We dissect the findings further by applying qualitative analysis on the impressions shared by the respondents. The findings show that e-business experience has direct effects on risk perception and the firms with less e-business experience perceive dependency risks as more severe, especially in terms of website developer, hardware, and software dependencies. On the other hand, larger and more experienced SMEs consider legal and compliance risks as more important especially where the cross-border transactions and data privacy issues are involved. Moreover, IT staff showed better appreciation of the reputational and employee risk factors more than the non-IT staff showing that technical knowledge is key to risk perception. Based on these results, this study posits that as SMEs gain e-business experience, their risk perceptions change and so do their understanding of external vulnerabilities and regulations.


Keywords


E-Business Experience, Organizational Roles, Legal Compliance, Security Concerns, SMEs, Cross-Border Transactions, Risk Perception, Data Privacy, Reputational Risks.


  1. A. Rajala and T. Hautala-Kankaanpää, “Exploring the effects of SMEs’ platform-based digital connectivity on firm performance – the moderating role of environmental turbulence,” Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, vol. 38, no. 13, pp. 15–30, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1108/jbim-01-2022-0024.
  2. K. Z. Zhou, C. K. Yim, and D. K. Tse, “The effects of strategic orientations on Technology- and Market-Based Breakthrough Innovations,” Journal of Marketing, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 42–60, Mar. 2005, doi: 10.1509/jmkg.69.2.42.60756.
  3. E. T. Straub, “Understanding Technology Adoption: Theory and Future Directions for Informal learning,” Review of Educational Research, vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 625–649, Jun. 2009, doi: 10.3102/0034654308325896.
  4. K. T. Yeo and F. Qiu, “The value of management flexibility—a real option approach to investment evaluation,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 243–250, Mar. 2003, doi: 10.1016/s0263-7863(02)00025-x.
  5. M. Kessler, J. C. Arlinghaus, E. Rosca, and M. Zimmermann, “Curse or Blessing? Exploring risk factors of digital technologies in industrial operations,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 243, p. 108323, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108323.
  6. H. G. Johnson, Technology and economic interdependence. 1975. doi: 10.1007/978-1-349-15611-5.
  7. M. Ghobakhloo and N. T. Ching, “Adoption of digital technologies of smart manufacturing in SMEs,” Journal of Industrial Information Integration, vol. 16, p. 100107, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jii.2019.100107.
  8. N. Erharuyi and D. Fairbairn, “Mobile geographic information handling technologies to support disaster management,” Geography, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 312–318, Nov. 2003, doi: 10.1080/20436564.2003.12219894.
  9. U. Jüttner, “Supply chain risk management,” The International Journal of Logistics Management, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 120–141, Jun. 2005, doi: 10.1108/09574090510617385.
  10. K. C. Arredondo-Soto, G. Hernández-Escobedo, A. Realyvásquez-Vargas, and M. A. Miranda-Ackerman, “Information Systems for Enterprise Resource Planning,” in Studies in systems, decision and control, 2022, pp. 3–28. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-00856-6_1.
  11. E.-N. Untaru and H. Han, “Protective measures against COVID-19 and the business strategies of the retail enterprises: Differences in gender, age, education, and income among shoppers,” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, vol. 60, p. 102446, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102446.
  12. M. R. Hossain, F. Akhter, and M. M. Sultana, “SMEs in Covid-19 Crisis and Combating Strategies: A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and A Case from Emerging Economy,” Operations Research Perspectives, vol. 9, p. 100222, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.orp.2022.100222.
  13. W. S. Hussain et al., “Strategies and Supports to Malaysian SMEs (MSMEs) Facing COVID 19: Road to Sustainability,” International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 12, no. 11, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.6007/ijarbss/v12-i11/15556.
  14. T. Adeboye, “Technology–oriented entrepreneurs in sub–Saharan Africa who are they and how are they involved in development and industrialization in Africa?,” Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 297–320, Jan. 1996, doi: 10.1080/08985629600000017.
  15. S. A. Zahra and D. M. Garvis, “International corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance,” Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 15, no. 5–6, pp. 469–492, Sep. 2000, doi: 10.1016/s0883-9026(99)00036-1.
  16. S. Müller, A. L. Kirst, H. Bergmann, and B. Bird, “Entrepreneurs’ actions and venture success: a structured literature review and suggestions for future research,” Small Business Economics, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 199–226, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11187-022-00644-3.
  17. J. Tomlinson, “Democracy inside the black box? Neo-classical theories of the firm and industrial democracy1,” Economy and Society, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 220–250, May 1986, doi: 10.1080/03085148600000008.
  18. I. Matthäus-Maier and J. D. Von Pischke, The development of the financial sector in Southeast Europe : innovative approaches in volatile environments. 2004. [Online]. Available: http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA66695166.

Acknowledgements


The authors would like to thank to the reviewers for nice comments on the manuscript.


Funding


No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.


Ethics declarations


Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.


Availability of data and materials


No data available for above study.


Author information


Contributions

All authors have equal contribution in the paper and all authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


Corresponding author


Rights and permissions


Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NoDerivs is a more restrictive license. It allows you to redistribute the material commercially or non-commercially but the user cannot make any changes whatsoever to the original, i.e. no derivatives of the original work. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/


Cite this article


Chiang Wang Yue, “Risk Perception Disparities in E-Business: Analyzing SME Roles, Experience and Legal Compliance Challenges”, Journal of Enterprise and Business Intelligence, vol.4, no.3, pp. 146-155, July 2024. doi: 10.53759/5181/JEBI202404015.


Copyright


© 2024 Chiang Wang Yue. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.