Journal of Enterprise and Business Intelligence


Benefits, Process and Challenges of Knowledge Management



Journal of Enterprise and Business Intelligence

Received On : 20 June 2023

Revised On : 18 October 2023

Accepted On : 18 November 2023

Published On : 05 April 2024

Volume 04, Issue 02

Pages : 083-094


Abstract


The significance of knowledge management (KM) in modern society has been widely discussed in recent years. There is widespread agreement that an organization's long-term health, competitive advantage, and capacity to stimulate innovation depend on its capabilities to effectively its information resources effectively. In this context, “management” refers to the internal process of disseminating, creating, retrieving, and storing data and knowledge inside an organization. Its principal goal is to aid the firm in its operations and improve its profitability. Successful knowledge management adoption calls for a comprehensive shift in an organization's culture and the unwavering commitment of its leaders at all levels. By fostering a conducive organizational environment, a company may effectively use its collective organizational learning and knowledge to address challenges on a global scale, irrespective of time constraints. This can be achieved through the implementation of KM practices. The principle objective of this research is to enhance the comprehension of KM and its capacity to help firms attain their business goals. Subsequently, an examination will be undertaken regarding certain obstacles pertaining to the execution of this approach within organizational contexts.


Keywords


Knowledge, Knowledge Management, Knowledge Sharing, Effective Management of Information, Collective Organizational Learning.


  1. F. S. Çakır and Z. Adıgüzel, “Analysis of Leader Effectiveness in Organization and Knowledge Sharing Behavior on Employees and Organization,” SAGE Open, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 215824402091463, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1177/2158244020914634.
  2. “Knowledge management: problems, promises, realities, and challenges,” IEEE Journals & Magazine | IEEE Xplore, Feb. 01, 2001. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/912386
  3. F. S. Khatibi, A. Dedekorkut-Howes, M. Howes, and E. Torabi, “Can public awareness, knowledge and engagement improve climate change adaptation policies?,” Discover Sustainability, vol. 2, no. 1, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s43621-021-00024-z.
  4. T. Nisar, “A systematic review of knowledge management and knowledge sharing: Trends, issues, and challenges,” Taylor & Francis. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311975.2015.1127744
  5. I. Nonaka, R. Toyama, and N. Konno, “SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation,” Long Range Planning, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 5–34, Feb. 2000, doi: 10.1016/s0024-6301(99)00115-6.
  6. J.-N. Lee, “The impact of knowledge sharing, organizational capability and partnership quality on IS outsourcing success,” Information & Management, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 323–335, Apr. 2001, doi: 10.1016/s0378-7206(00)00074-4.
  7. A. Tiwana and B. Ramesh, “A design knowledge management system to support collaborative information product evolution,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 241–262, Jun. 2001, doi: 10.1016/s0167-9236(00)00134-2.
  8. Y. S. Hau, B. Kim, H. Lee, and Y. Kim, “The effects of individual motivations and social capital on employees’ tacit and explicit knowledge sharing intentions,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 356–366, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2012.10.009.
  9. R. M. Grant, “The knowledge-based view of the firm: Implications for management practice,” Long Range Planning, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 450–454, Jun. 1997, doi: 10.1016/s0024-6301(97)00025-3.
  10. C. W. Choo, “The knowing organization: How organizations use information to construct meaning, create knowledge and make decisions,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 329–340, Oct. 1996, doi: 10.1016/0268-4012(96)00020-5.
  11. F. Blackler, “Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and interpretation,” Organization Studies, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1021–1046, Nov. 1995, doi: 10.1177/017084069501600605.
  12. T. Grootswagers, R. M. Cichy, and T. A. Carlson, “Finding decodable information that can be read out in behaviour,” NeuroImage, vol. 179, pp. 252–262, Oct. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.06.022.
  13. D. A. Lustri, I. K. Miura, and S. Takahashi, “Knowledge management model: practical application for competency development,” The Learning Organization, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 186–202, Mar. 2007, doi: 10.1108/09696470710727023.
  14. R. Filippini, W. H. Güttel, and A. Nosella, “Ambidexterity and the evolution of knowledge management initiatives,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 317–324, Mar. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.04.003.
  15. T. Maqsood, A. Finegan, and D. H. T. Walker, “Applying project histories and project learning through knowledge management in an Australian construction company,” The Learning Organization, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 80–95, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1108/09696470610639149.
  16. G. S. Lynn, R. R. Reilly, and A. E. Akgün, “Knowledge management in new product teams: practices and outcomes,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 221–231, May 2000, doi: 10.1109/17.846789.
  17. D.-K. Kim, S. T. Çavuşgil, and R. J. Calantone, “Information System Innovations and Supply chain Management: channel relationships and firm performance,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 40–54, Jan. 2006, doi: 10.1177/0092070305281619.
  18. C. Holsapple, Handbook on Knowledge Management 1: Knowledge Matters. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
  19. A. Jetter, J. Kraaijenbrink, H.-H. Schröder, and F. Wijnhoven, Knowledge integration: The Practice of Knowledge Management in Small and Medium Enterprises. Springer Science & Business Media, 2006.
  20. M. Y. Yi, J. Jackson, J. S. Park, and J. C. Probst, “Understanding information technology acceptance by individual professionals: Toward an integrative view,” Information & Management, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 350–363, Apr. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.im.2005.08.006.
  21. A. M. Abubakar, H. Elrehail, M. Alatailat, and A. Elçi, “Knowledge management, decision-making style and organizational performance,” Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 104–114, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2017.07.003.
  22. R. Maier, T. Hädrich, and R. Peinl, Enterprise Knowledge Infrastructures. Springer Science & Business Media, 2009.
  23. S. N. Mohanty, Decision Making And Problem Solving: A Practical Guide For Applied Research. Springer Nature, 2021.
  24. M. H. Jarrahi, “Artificial intelligence and the future of work: Human-AI symbiosis in organizational decision making,” Business Horizons, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 577–586, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2018.03.007.
  25. V. Papadakis and P. Barwise, Strategic decisions. Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
  26. J. Förster, E. T. Higgins, and A. T. Bianco, “Speed/accuracy decisions in task performance: Built-in trade-off or separate strategic concerns?,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 148–164, Jan. 2003, doi: 10.1016/s0749-5978(02)00509-5.
  27. S. Y. Sung and J. N. Choi, “Effects of team knowledge management on the creativity and financial performance of organizational teams,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, vol. 118, no. 1, pp. 4–13, May 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2012.01.001.
  28. S. Aydin and M. Dubé, “Knowledge management, innovation, and competitive advantage: is the relationship in the eye of the beholder?,” Knowledge Management Research & Practice, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 402–413, Jul. 2018, doi: 10.1080/14778238.2018.1496564.
  29. S. K. Singh, S. Gupta, D. Busso, and S. Kamboj, “Top management knowledge value, knowledge sharing practices, open innovation and organizational performance,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 128, pp. 788–798, May 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.04.040.
  30. R. J. Calantone, S. T. Çavuşgil, and Y. Zhao, “Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance,” Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 515–524, Sep. 2002, doi: 10.1016/s0019-8501(01)00203-6.
  31. S. Newell, J. C. Huang, R. D. Galliers, and S. L. Pan, “Implementing enterprise resource planning and knowledge management systems in tandem: fostering efficiency and innovation complementarity,” Information and Organization, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 25–52, Jan. 2003, doi: 10.1016/s1471-7727(02)00007-6.
  32. M. Marra, “The contribution of evaluation to socialization and externalization of tacit knowledge,” Evaluation, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 263–283, Jul. 2004, doi: 10.1177/1356389004048278.
  33. S. C. Park, “Knowledge capturing methodology in process planning,” Computer-Aided Design, vol. 35, no. 12, pp. 1109–1117, Oct. 2003, doi: 10.1016/s0010-4485(02)00182-3.
  34. A. Balaid, M. Z. A. Rozan, S. N. Hikmi, and J. Memon, “Knowledge maps: A systematic literature review and directions for future research,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 451–475, Jun. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.02.005.
  35. C. Lin, “To share or not to share: modeling tacit knowledge sharing, its mediators and antecedents,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 411–428, Oct. 2006, doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9119-0.
  36. K. G. B. Bakewell, A manual of Cataloguing practice: International Series of Monographs In library and Information Science. Elsevier, 2014.
  37. R. P. Smiraglia, The elements of knowledge organization. Springer, 2014.
  38. M. J. Donate and J. D. S. De Pablo, “The role of knowledge-oriented leadership in knowledge management practices and innovation,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 360–370, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.06.022.
  39. S. Chou, “Knowledge creation: absorptive capacity, organizational mechanisms, and knowledge storage/retrieval capabilities,” Journal of Information Science, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 453–465, Dec. 2005, doi: 10.1177/0165551505057005.
  40. J. Alegre and R. Chiva, “Assessing the impact of organizational learning capability on product innovation performance: An empirical test,” Technovation, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 315–326, Jun. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.09.003.
  41. E. Ode and R. Ayavoo, “The mediating role of knowledge application in the relationship between knowledge management practices and firm innovation,” Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 210–218, Jul. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jik.2019.08.002.
  42. S. K. Singh, S. Gupta, D. Busso, and S. Kamboj, “Top management knowledge value, knowledge sharing practices, open innovation and organizational performance,” Journal of Business Research, vol. 128, pp. 788–798, May 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.04.040.
  43. P. Compton and R. J. G. Jansen, “A philosophical basis for knowledge acquisition,” Knowledge Acquisition, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 241–258, Sep. 1990, doi: 10.1016/s1042-8143(05)80017-2.
  44. D. Richards and B. H. Kang, Knowledge management and acquisition for intelligent systems: 12th Pacific Rim Knowledge Acquisition Workshop, PKAW 2012, Kuching, Malaysia, September 5-6, 2012, Proceedings. Springer, 2012.
  45. M. Kukko, “Knowledge sharing barriers in organic growth: A case study from a software company,” The Journal of High Technology Management Research, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 18–29, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.hitech.2013.02.006.
  46. D. J. Burgess, “What motivates employees to transfer knowledge outside their work unit?,” Journal of Business Communication, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 324–348, Oct. 2005, doi: 10.1177/0021943605279485.
  47. R. Al-Adaileh and M. S. Al-Atawi, “Organizational culture impact on knowledge exchange: Saudi Telecom context,” Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 212–230, Apr. 2011, doi: 10.1108/13673271111119664.
  48. P. J. Buckley, J. Clegg, and H. Tan, “Cultural awareness in knowledge transfer to China—The role of guanxi and mianzi,” Journal of World Business, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 275–288, Sep. 2006, doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2006.01.008.
  49. T. J. Smith, “Diversity and disability: exploring the experiences of vision impaired people in the workplace,” Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 59–72, Dec. 2002, doi: 10.1108/02610150210787262.
  50. T. M. Kühlmann and R. Heinz, Managing Cultural Diversity in Small and Medium-Sized Organizations: A Guideline for Practitioners. Springer, 2017.
  51. C. E. Connelly, D. P. Ford, O. Turel, R. B. Gallupe, and D. Zweig, “‘I’m busy (and competitive)!’ Antecedents of knowledge sharing under pressure,” Knowledge Management Research & Practice, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 74–85, Feb. 2014, doi: 10.1057/kmrp.2012.61.
  52. T. Rasool, N. F. Warraich, and M. I. Sajid, “Examining the impact of technology overload at the workplace: A Systematic review,” SAGE Open, vol. 12, no. 3, p. 215824402211143, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1177/21582440221114320.
  53. M. A. U. Haq and S. Anwar, “A systematic review of knowledge management and knowledge sharing: Trends, issues, and challenges,” Cogent Business & Management, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 1127744, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2015.1127744.
  54. C. E. Connelly and E. K. Kelloway, “Predictors of employees’ perceptions of knowledge sharing cultures,” Leadership & Organization Development Journal, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 294–301, Aug. 2003, doi: 10.1108/01437730310485815.
  55. R. M. Davison, C. X. Ou, and M. G. Martinsons, “Interpersonal knowledge exchange in China: The impact of guanxi and social media,” Information & Management, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 224–234, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.im.2017.05.008.
  56. A. M. Saks, “Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement,” Journal of Managerial Psychology, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 600–619, Oct. 2006, doi: 10.1108/02683940610690169.
  57. N. Nordin, “The Influence Of Emotional Intelligence, Leadership Behaviour And Organizational Commitment On Organizational Readiness For Change In Higher Learning Institution,” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 29, pp. 129–138, Jan. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.217.
  58. M. J. Somers, “The combined influence of affective, continuance and normative commitment on employee withdrawal,” Journal of Vocational Behavior, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 75–81, Feb. 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2008.10.006.
  59. I. R. Ismail, N. Tajuddin, and N. K. M. Yunus, “Trust and intention to share as predictors of online Knowledge-Sharing behavior,” in Springer eBooks, 2018, pp. 57–67. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-0203-9_6.
  60. S. J. Harrington and T. Guimarães, “Corporate culture, absorptive capacity and IT success,” Information and Organization, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 39–63, Jan. 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2004.10.002.

Acknowledgements


Authors thank Reviewers for taking the time and effort necessary to review the manuscript.


Funding


No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.


Ethics declarations


Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.


Availability of data and materials


No data available for above study.


Author information


Contributions

All authors have equal contribution in the paper and all authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


Corresponding author


Rights and permissions


Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NoDerivs is a more restrictive license. It allows you to redistribute the material commercially or non-commercially but the user cannot make any changes whatsoever to the original, i.e. no derivatives of the original work. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/


Cite this article


Rafael Fierro and Gaby Benalil, “Benefits, Process and Challenges of Knowledge Management”, Journal of Enterprise and Business Intelligence, vol.4, no.2, pp. 083-094, April 2024. doi: 10.53759/5181/JEBI202404009.


Copyright


© 2024 Rafael Fierro and Gaby Benalil. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.