Brain-based learning (BBL) is grounded in an understanding of the structure and function of the brain, as well as empirical evidence derived from cognitive neuroscience research regarding optimal learning strategies for the brain. Educational programs that prioritize brain science in their curriculum and instructional methods are commonly referred to as "brain-based." The aim is to achieve efficient and expeditious education. As per the Education Reform, this particular approach is based on research that examines the brain's potential to restructure itself in order to enhance its capacity to retain and retrieve information while engaged in the process of learning. Enhancing one's capacity can be achieved through engaging in physical activity, maintaining a healthy diet, and effectively managing stress levels. The emotional state of an individual can also have an impact on their learning process. This study presents findings on the correlation between teachers' knowledge, beliefs, and frequency of implementation of brain-based learning strategies in primary Science classes. The research questions addressed in this paper are focused on determining the existence of such a correlation. The study comprised 207 educators from elementary schools in Croatia. The results suggest that educators at the primary level possess a sound understanding of brain-centered pedagogical approaches, yet they infrequently put them into practice. The educational process remains entrenched in a historically rooted paradigm that has not adequately shifted towards student-centered teaching. This is evidenced by the persistent employment of traditional, teacher-led instructional methods in elementary Science classrooms.
O. L. Gamboa, K. Sung Lai Yuen, F. von Wegner, M. Behrens, and H. Steinmetz, “The challenge of forgetting: Neurobiological mechanisms of auditory directed forgetting,” Hum. Brain Mapp., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 249–263, 2018.
J. S. Ha, J. K. Kim, and Korean Association For Learner-Centered Curriculum And Instruction, “Basic directions of brain-based basic operations programs for cognitive and emotion activation of children at risk of learning disabilities,” Korean Assoc. Learn.-Centered Curric. Instr., vol. 22, no. 16, pp. 59–77, 2022.
M. Versteeg, A. Hafkemeijer, A. J. Beaufort, and P. Steendijk, “An understanding of (mis)understanders: Exploring the underlying mechanisms of concept learning using functional magnetic resonance imaging,” Mind Brain Educ., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 129–138, 2021.
F. S. Rodriguez, L. Zheng, H. C. Chui, and Aging Brain: Vasculature, Ischemia, and Behavior Study, “Psychometric characteristics of cognitive reserve: How high education might improve certain cognitive abilities in aging,” Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord., vol. 47, no. 4–6, pp. 335–344, 2019.
K. Langer, V. L. Jentsch, and O. T. Wolf, “Acute stress influences strategy preference when dealing with high intensity emotions in men,” Biol. Psychol., vol. 169, no. 108264, p. 108264, 2022.
I. Sakamaki, M. Tavakoli, S. Wiebe, and K. Adams, “Examination of effectiveness of kinaesthetic haptic feedback for motor imagery-based brain-computer interface training,” Brain Comput. Interfaces (Abingdon), vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 16–37, 2023.
M. Maes and A. F. Almulla, “Research and Diagnostic Algorithmic Rules (RADAR) and RADAR plots for the first episode of major depressive disorder: Effects of childhood and recent adverse experiences on suicidal behaviors, neurocognition and phenome features,” Brain Sci., vol. 13, no. 5, 2023.
Y. N. Aranda, P. Bhatt, N. Ates, B. A. Engel, and H. Simsek, “Cyanophage-cyanobacterial interactions for sustainable aquatic environment,” Environ. Res., vol. 229, no. 115728, p. 115728, 2023.
M. Jiang, S. E. Jang, and L. Zeng, “The effects of extrinsic and intrinsic factors on neurogenesis,” Cells, vol. 12, no. 9, 2023.
J. P. Cook, Z. Reed, and E. Lockwood, “An initial framework for analyzing students’ reasoning with equivalence across mathematical domains,” J. Math. Behav., vol. 66, no. 100935, p. 100935, 2022.
A. Occhipinti Liberman and R. K. Rendsvig, “Reasoning about epistemic social network dynamics using dynamic term-modal logic,” J. Logic Comput., vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1067–1087, 2022.
M. D. Stockbridge, S. M. Sheppard, L. M. Keator, L. L. Murray, M. Lehman Blake, and Right Hemisphere Disorders working group, Evidence-Based Clinical Research Committee, Academy of Neurological Communication Disorders and Sciences, “Aprosodia subsequent to right hemisphere brain damage: A systematic review and meta-analysis,” J. Int. Neuropsychol. Soc., vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 709–735, 2022.
B. G. Ibrahimov, Z. A. Ismaylov, M. Y. Orujova, and I. M. Mammadov, “About one problem of control network and channel resources in communication networks during processing useful and service message signals,” in 2022 Wave Electronics and its Application in Information and Telecommunication Systems (WECONF), 2022.
M. A. Habib, M. R. Alam, T. Rahman, A. I. Chowdhury, and L. C. Shill, “Knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of nutrition among school teachers in Bangladesh: A cross-sectional study,” PLoS One, vol. 18, no. 3, p. e0283530, 2023.
A. Venneri, D. Duzzi, C. Pilosio, J. Rigon, and F. Meneghello, “P4–253: Neuroplastic effects induced by treatment with rivastigmine in MCI increase functional connectivity between the hippocampus and other limbic and cortical regions,” Alzheimers. Dement., vol. 9, no. 4S_Part_20, pp. P798–P799, 2013.
K. Teymournezhad, H. Azgomi, and A. Asghari, “Detection of counterfeit banknotes by security components based on image processing and GoogLeNet deep learning network,” Signal Image Video Process., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1505–1513, 2022.
“The power of your subconscious mind,” Brian Tracy, 21-Jul-2022. [Online]. Available: https://www.briantracy.com/blog/personal-success/understanding-your-subconscious-mind/. [Accessed: 09-Jun-2023].
J. Kerssen-Griep, A. R. Trees, and J. A. Hess, “Attentive facework during instructional feedback: Key to perceiving mentorship and an optimal learning environment,” Commun. Educ., vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 312–332, 2008.
L. Montocchio, A. Niedenthal, N. Cooper, and A. Gronstedt, “Repetitive skill practice: Blending experiential learning & technology,” Training Industry, 04-Mar-2010. [Online]. Available: https://trainingindustry.com/articles/learning-technologies/repetitive-skill-practice-blending-experiential-learning-technology/. [Accessed: 09-Jun-2023].
N. Alahyane and D. Pélisson, “Visually guided saccade adaptation: Transfer to averaging saccades elicited by double visual stimuli,” Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., vol. 1004, no. 1, pp. 377–380, 2003.
M. Autenrieth, S. E. Kober, and G. Wood, “Assessment of the capacity to modulate brain signals in a home-based SMR neurofeedback training setting,” Front. Hum. Neurosci., vol. 16, p. 1032222, 2022.
D. A. Kemp, “Relevance, pertinence and information system development,” Inf. Storage Retr., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 37–47, 1974.
S. Kobayashi and T. Shibuya, “Reinforcement learning compensator robust to the time constants of first order delay elements,” in 2020 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC), 2020.
Y. Tang et al., “Corrigendum to ‘functional connectivity learning via Siamese-based SPD matrix representation of brain imaging data’ [neural networks 163 (2023) 272-285],” Neural Netw., vol. 164, p. 575, 2023.
A. Chung, N. Dahan, J. M. Alarcon, and A. A. Fenton, “Effects of regulatory BC1 RNA deletion on synaptic plasticity, learning, and memory,” Learn. Mem., vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 646–649, 2017.
T. Sakuma, K. Kitajima, M. Nishiyama, M. Mashino, T. Hashita, and N. Nemoto, “Suppression of female-specific murine Cyp2b9 gene expression by growth or glucocorticoid hormones,” Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., vol. 323, no. 3, pp. 776–781, 2004.
R. Cools, E. Aarts, and M. A. Mehta, “Paradoxical effects of drugs on cognitive function: the neuropsychopharmacology of the dopamine and other neurotransmitter systems,” in The Paradoxical Brain, N. Kapur, Ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011, pp. 397–417.
R. Caccavale and A. Finzi, “Learning attentional regulations for structured tasks execution in robotic cognitive control,” Auton. Robots, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 2229–2243, 2019.
A. Dodds, “Anxiety, stress and the learning process,” in Rehabilitating Blind and Visually Impaired People, Boston, MA: Springer US, 1993, pp. 126–141.
G. Makridis, P. Mavrepis, and D. Kyriazis, “A deep learning approach using natural language processing and time-series forecasting towards enhanced food safety,” Mach. Learn., vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 1287–1313, 2023.
J. A. Larsen, “Measuring child-level originality through the strategic use of incubation periods during divergent thinking assessment,” Think. Skills Creat., vol. 46, no. 101147, p. 101147, 2022.
M. Rahimi and L. J. Zhang, “Effects of an engaging process-genre approach on student engagement and writing achievements,” Read. Writ. Q., vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 487–503, 2022.
M. van der Velden, “‘I felt a new connection between my fingers and brain’: a thematic analysis of student reflections on the use of pen and paper during lectures,” Teach. High. Educ., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 784–801, 2023.
K. Atrey, B. K. Singh, N. K. Bodhey, and R. Bilas Pachori, “Mammography and ultrasound based dual modality classification of breast cancer using a hybrid deep learning approach,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 86, no. 104919, p. 104919, 2023.
S. Iniyan, A. Singh, and B. Hazra, “Wavelet transformation and vertical stacking based image classification applying machine learning,” Biomed. Signal Process. Control, vol. 79, no. 104103, p. 104103, 2023.
I. Demchenko, B. Maksymchuk, V. Bilan, I. Maksymchuk, and I. Kalynovska, “Training future physical education teachers for professional activities under the conditions of inclusive education,” Brain (Bacau), vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 191–213, 2021.
F. Longmuir, “Leading with students: relational focus of leading practices in alternative settings,” J. Educ. Adm. Hist., pp. 1–18, 2022.
H. Luong, T. Falkenberg, and M. Rahimian, “Students’ learning experience with a flipped introductory organic chemistry course: A course designed for non-chemistry majors,” Can. J. Learn. Technol., vol. 47, no. 1, 2021.
A. H. Saffar Kohneh Quchan, Department of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran, M. R. Kordi, F. Shabkhiz, Department of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran, and Department of Exercise Physiology, Faculty of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran, “The effect of four weeks of physical activity on Rac1 protein levels and plasticity of WDR neurons in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord in mice with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis,” Neurosci. J. Shefaye Khatam, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1–9, 2022.
“Effectiveness of mulligan’s movement with mobilization and muscle energy technique on pain, functional status, and depression in students with sacro iliac joint dysfunction,” J. Liaquat Univ. Med. Health Sci., 2023.
A. Imani and H. Habil, “NNS postgraduate students’ academic writing: Problem-solving strategies and grammatical features,” Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 66, pp. 460–471, 2012.
H. Wang et al., “Sleep, short-term memory, and mood states of volunteers with increasing altitude,” Front. Psychiatry, vol. 13, p. 952399, 2022.
M. Pérez-Chantes, M. L. Nolé, and J. L. Higuera-Trujillo, “Seating arrangement: A flexible and influential variable in the attention of university students,” in INTED2023 Proceedings, 2023.
K. Jasińska et al., “Home learning environment and physical development impact children’s executive function development and literacy in rural Côte d’Ivoire,” Cogn. Dev., vol. 64, no. 101265, p. 101265, 2022.
W. Darmawan, W. I. Fauzi, A. B. Santosa, and J. Nisa, “Students’ response to the implementation of brain-based learning (the BBL) approach in history teaching,” Cypriot J. Educ. Sci., vol. 17, no. 9, pp. 3409–3422, 2022.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Reviewers for taking the time and effort necessary to review the manuscript. We sincerely appreciate all valuable comments and suggestions, which helped us to improve the quality of the manuscript.
Funding
No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Availability of data and materials
No data available for above study.
Author information
Contributions
All authors have equal contribution in the paper and all authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Rajeshkumar M
Rajeshkumar M
Department of MBA, PSG Institute of Management, Coimbatore, India.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NoDerivs is a more restrictive license. It allows you to redistribute the material commercially or non-commercially but the user cannot make any changes whatsoever to the original, i.e. no derivatives of the original work. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Cite this article
Rajeshkumar M, “Correlation between Teachers Knowledge, Beliefs, and Frequency of Implementation of Brain Based Learning Strategies”, Journal of Enterprise and Business Intelligence, vol.3, no.4, pp. 190-200, October 2023. doi: 10.53759/5181/JEBI202303019.
