In conventional practice, unprocessed biomass resources are transported to biorefineries where they undergo
preprocessing to become feedstock before undergoing conversion into various products. The constant supply of biomass
to biorefinery cannot be achieved on a just-in-time basis due to the fact that various forms of biomaterials, such as energy
crops, logging residue, and agricultural residue, are harvested based on their cycle of development and optimum
harvesting timeframe. Biomaterials are typically stored and subsequently transported to biorefineries on an as-needed
basis. The current approach has resulted in various challenges concerning logistics, biomass degradation caused by fire
and microorganisms, and irregular quality of feedstock as a result of the changing characteristics of the delivered biomass
materials. This has been observed through previous encounters. The aforementioned factors have resulted in elevated
feedstock expenses, reduced processing capacity, and diminished product output for biorefineries. The present study
introduces a novel approach to tackle the challenges associated with conventional methods of biomass feedstock
procurement, retention, and preliminary processing, as discussed earlier. This strategy comprises three fundamental
elements: firstly, the conservation and preparation of biomass throughout its storage; secondly, the incorporation of all
biomass components, even those typically deemed as refuse or impurities; and thirdly, the optimization of the worth of
each component. The implementation of this novel methodology involves the establishment of feedstock preprocessing
depots in close proximity to the sources of biomass production
Keywords
Biomass Energy Systems, Biorefineries, Feedstock Preprocessing, Biomass Materials, Biomass
Degradation.
P. Ruiz et al., “ENSPRESO - an open, EU-28 wide, transparent and coherent database of wind, solar and biomass energy potentials,” Energy
Strat. Rev., vol. 26, no. 100379, p. 100379, 2019.
M. Röder, A. Mohr, and Y. Liu, “This special issue ‘Development of modern bioenergy approaches in low- and middle-income countries’
presents examples of the latest bioenergy research in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs),” Biomass Bioenergy, vol. 146, no. 105932,
p. 105932, 2021.
J. Barrera-Santana and R. Sioshansi, “An optimization framework for capacity planning of island electricity systems,” Renew. Sustain. Energy
Rev., vol. 171, no. 112955, p. 112955, 2023.
A. Aguiar, T. S. Milessi, D. R. Mulinari, M. S. Lopes, S. M. da Costa, and R. G. Candido, “Sugarcane straw as a potential second generation
feedstock for biorefinery and white biotechnology applications,” Biomass Bioenergy, vol. 144, no. 105896, p. 105896, 2021.
V. Vijay, R. Kapoor, P. Singh, M. Hiloidhari, and P. Ghosh, “Sustainable utilization of biomass resources for decentralized energy generation
and climate change mitigation: A regional case study in India,” Environ. Res., vol. 212, no. Pt B, p. 113257, 2022.
H. Hadiyanto, M. Christwardana, and C. da Costa, “Electrogenic and biomass production capabilities of a Microalgae–Microbial fuel cell
(MMFC) system using tapioca wastewater and Spirulina platensis for COD reduction,” Energy Sources Recovery Util. Environ. Eff., vol. 45,
no. 2, pp. 3409–3420, 2023.
N. Tripathi, C. D. Hills, R. S. Singh, and C. J. Atkinson, “Biomass waste utilisation in low-carbon products: harnessing a major potential
resource,” Npj Clim. Atmos. Sci., vol. 2, no. 1, 2019.
N. Kaliyan, R. V. Morey, and D. G. Tiffany, “Reducing life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of corn ethanol by integrating biomass to produce
heat and power at ethanol plants,” Biomass Bioenergy, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 1103–1113, 2011.
“NREL study identifies the opportunities and challenges of achieving the U.s. transformational goal of 100% clean electricity by 2035,”
Energy.gov. [Online]. Available: https://www.energy.gov/eere/articles/nrel-study-identifies-opportunities-and-challenges-achieving-us-
transformational-goal. [Accessed: 21-Apr-2023].
D. Gonzales, E. M. Searcy, and S. D. Ekşioğlu, “Cost analysis for high-volume and long-haul transportation of densified biomass feedstock,”
Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., vol. 49, pp. 48–61, 2013.
W.-S. Cho, Y.-H. Chung, B.-K. Kim, S.-J. Suh, W.-S. Koh, and S.-H. Choe, “Cellulosic Ethanol as Renewable Alternative Fuel,” J. Plant
Biotechnol., vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 111–118, 2007.
I. G. Hakeem et al., “Techno‐economic analysis of biochemical conversion of biomass to biofuels and platform chemicals,” Biofuel. Bioprod.
Biorefin., 2022.
T. Wei et al., “Efficient adsorption of tetracycline hydrochloride by Willow Catkins based biochar: Performance, governing factors and
mechanisms,” Biomass Convers. Biorefin., 2023.
A. Chandler and T. Jewell, “Standards -- libraries, data providers, and SUSHI: The standardized usage statistics harvesting initiative,” Against
Grain, vol. 18, no. 2, 2006.
W. A. Smith, I. J. Bonner, K. L. Kenney, and L. M. Wendt, “Practical considerations of moisture in baled biomass feedstocks,” Biofuels, vol.
4, no. 1, pp. 95–110, 2013.
“Advanced preprocessing systems for conversion-ready feedstocks,” Aiche.org, 31-Mar-2022. [Online]. Available:
https://www.aiche.org/resources/publications/cep/2022/april/advanced-preprocessing-systems-conversion-ready-feedstocks. [Accessed: 21-
Apr-2023].
J. P. Polin, H. D. Carr, L. E. Whitmer, R. G. Smith, and R. C. Brown, “Conventional and autothermal pyrolysis of corn stover: Overcoming the
processing challenges of high-ash agricultural residues,” J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, vol. 143, no. 104679, p. 104679, 2019.
Q. A. Nguyen, W. A. Smith, B. D. Wahlen, and L. M. Wendt, “Total and sustainable utilization of biomass resources: A perspective,” Front.
Bioeng. Biotechnol., vol. 8, p. 546, 2020.
“Net wrap vs. Twine,” American Cattlemen, 06-May-2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.americancattlemen.com/articles/net-wrap-vs-
twine. [Accessed: 21-Apr-2023].
E. J. L. Lazarus and E. D. W. Lawa, “Effect of cooking time and urea level on dry matter loss, nitrogen fixation and digestibility of dry matter,
organic matter in vitro in the combined products of urea-pith Gewang (Corypha Utan Lamk.) starch,” GSC Adv. Res. Rev., vol. 12, no. 2, pp.
058–068, 2022.
Y. Zhang, T. R. Brown, G. Hu, and R. C. Brown, “Techno-economic analysis of monosaccharide production via fast pyrolysis of
lignocellulose,” Bioresour. Technol., vol. 127, pp. 358–365, 2013.
K. L. Kenney, J. R. Hess, N. A. Stevens, W. A. Smith, I. J. Bonner, and D. J. Muth, “Biomass Logistics,” in Bioprocessing of Renewable
Resources to Commodity Bioproducts, Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2014, pp. 29–42.
A Tub-Grinding/Roll-Press Compaction System to Increase Biomass Bulk Density: Preliminary Study.
N. Narendranathan and E. C. Lee, “Dynamic compaction and dynamic consolidation of soils,” in Ground Improvement Case Histories,
Elsevier, 2015, pp. 365–398.
Functional Performance of Self-Loading Wagon Compared to Metered chopper for Forage Harvest.
B. M. and P. Spanoghe, “Pesticide Residues in Fruits and Vegetables,” in Pesticides - Formulations, Effects, Fate, InTech, 2011.
S. Zhuo et al., “Conquering lignin recalcitrance by Pandoraea sp. B-6 to improve co-solvent pretreatment of corn stover,” Process Biochem.,
vol. 75, pp. 187–193, 2018.
Z. Zhang, H. Zheng, and J. Qian, “Pretreatment with a combination of steam explosion and NaOH increases butanol production of
enzymatically hydrolyzed corn stover,” Renew. Energy, vol. 203, pp. 301–311, 2023.
S. Ashrafi Birgani, M. Talaeipour, A. Hemmasi, B. Bazyar, and K. Larijani, “Removal of heavy metal ions using cellulose nanocrystals and
succinic anhydride-modified cellulose nanocrystals prepared from bleached soda bagasse pulp,” Bioresources, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 4886–4904,
2022.
M. Singh, U. Nara, N. Rani, D. Pathak, M. K. Sangha, and K. Kaur, “Mineral content variation in leaves, stalks, and seeds of celery (Apium
graveolens L.) genotypes,” Biol. Trace Elem. Res., vol. 201, no. 5, pp. 2665–2673, 2023.
Q. Zhang, L. Cheng, X. Ma, X. Zhou, and Y. Xu, “Revalorization of sunflower stalk pith as feedstock for the coproduction of pectin and
glucose using a two-step dilute acid pretreatment process,” Biotechnol. Biofuels, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 194, 2021.
S. K. Zhou, M. Xing, J. Zhang, and J. W. Pu, “Preparation of acetate grade pulp from birch by alkali preimpregnation Kraft process,” Adv.
Mat. Res., vol. 129–131, pp. 964–967, 2010.
C. Cara, E. Ruiz, I. Ballesteros, M. J. Negro, and E. Castro, “Enhanced enzymatic hydrolysis of olive tree wood by steam explosion and
alkaline peroxide delignification,” Process Biochem., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 423–429, 2006.
Y. Zhang, H. Wang, X. Sun, Y. Wang, and Z. Liu, “Separation and characterization of biomass components (cellulose, hemicellulose, and
lignin) from corn stalk,” Bioresources, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 7205–7219, 2021.
Y. Yang, M. Chu, C. Hao, and L. Zhou, “Preparation of low silicon ultra clean coal by flotation pretreatment followed by alkali-acid leaching
combined process,” Energy Sources Recovery Util. Environ. Eff., vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 2621–2636, 2023.
A. R. Smith and J. Klosek, “A review of air separation technologies and their integration with energy conversion processes,” Fuel Process.
Technol., vol. 70, no. 2, pp. 115–134, 2001.
S. Ahn, G. Choi, and D. Kim, “The effect of wood biomass blending with pulverized coal on combustion characteristics under oxy-fuel
condition,” Biomass Bioenergy, vol. 71, pp. 144–154, 2014.
T. Grejtak et al., “Improving knife milling performance for biomass preprocessing by using advanced blade materials,” Wear, vol. 522, no.
204714, p. 204714, 2023.
A. L. Campos, B. M. Fronza, M. C. Rodrigues, M. D. E. Souza Chiari, and R. R. Braga, “Influence of the calcium orthophosphate:glass ratio
and calcium orthophosphate functionalization on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of resin-based composites,” J. Biomed.
Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater., vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 95–102, 2023.
R. I. Muazu, A. L. Borrion, and J. A. Stegemann, “Corrigendum to ‘Life cycle assessment of biomass densification systems’ [Biomass
Bioenergy 107 (2017) 384–397],” Biomass Bioenergy, vol. 135, no. 105352, p. 105352, 2020.
C. Gudavalli, E. Bose, B. S. Donohoe, and D. A. Sievers, “Real-time biomass feedstock particle quality detection using image analysis and
machine vision,” Biomass Convers. Biorefin., vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 5739–5750, 2022.
J. R. Hess, A. E. Ray, and T. G. Rials, “Editorial: Advancements in biomass feedstock preprocessing: Conversion ready feedstocks,” Front.
Energy Res., vol. 7, 2019.
G. G. Hewavitharana, D. N. Perera, S. B. Navaratne, and I. Wickramasinghe, “Extraction methods of fat from food samples and preparation of
fatty acid methyl esters for gas chromatography: A review,” Arab. J. Chem., vol. 13, no. 8, pp. 6865–6875, 2020.
N. Chevanan et al., “Bulk density and compaction behavior of knife mill chopped switchgrass, wheat straw, and corn stover,” Bioresour.
Technol., vol. 101, no. 1, pp. 207–214, 2010.
R. Zamora-Cristales, J. Sessions, D. Smith, and G. Marrs, “Effect of grinder configuration on forest biomass bulk density, particle size
distribution and fuel consumption,” Biomass Bioenergy, vol. 81, pp. 44–54, 2015.
S. G. Llewellyn Smith and Y. Hattori, “Generation of bulk vorticity and current density in current-vortex sheet models,” High Energy Density
Phys., vol. 33, no. 100712, p. 100712, 2019.
F. Zhao, Y.-Z. Zhang, Z.-D. Xu, L. Li, and S.-B. Zhang, “Standardized processes of biomass briquetting densification fuel,” For. Stud. China,
vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 80–84, 2012.
H. Gilvari, C. H. H. van Battum, S. A. van Dijk, W. de Jong, and D. L. Schott, “Large-scale transportation and storage of wood pellets:
Investigation of the change in physical properties,” Particuology, vol. 57, pp. 146–156, 2021.
S. K. Nielsen, M. Mandø, and A. B. Rosenørn, “Review of die design and process parameters in the biomass pelleting process,” Powder
Technol., vol. 364, pp. 971–985, 2020.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Reviewers for taking the time and effort necessary to review the manuscript. We sincerely appreciate all valuable comments and suggestions, which helped us to improve the quality of the manuscript.
Funding
No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Availability of data and materials
No data available for above study.
Author information
Contributions
All authors have equal contribution in the paper and all authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Garcia Fernandez
Garcia Fernandez
USIL, Campus Fernando Belaunde Terry, La Molina Location, La Molina, Peru.
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NoDerivs is a more restrictive license. It allows you to redistribute the material commercially or non-commercially but the user cannot make any changes whatsoever to the original, i.e. no derivatives of the original work. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Cite this article
Garcia Fernandez, “A Review of Comprehensive and Ethical Utilization of the Worlds Biomass Resources”, Journal of Enterprise and Business Intelligence, vol.3, no.3, pp. 157-168, July 2023. doi: 10.53759/5181/JEBI202303016.