Journal of Enterprise and Business Intelligence


A Review of Executive Leadership Charateristics and Performance of Firms



Journal of Enterprise and Business Intelligence

Received On : 02 June 2022

Revised On : 25 July 2022

Accepted On : 05 September 2022

Published On : 05 January 2023

Volume 03, Issue 01

Pages : 033-043


Abstract


The culture of a company is shaped and reinforced by its senior management team, which plays a major role in guiding and motivating employees and teams. This team serves as the core hub and driving force behind the organization's operations. These people effectively communicate their objectives, establish a well-defined and feasible plan for attaining those objectives, and, of utmost significance, inspire and enable all other members inside the company to achieve success. The objective of this study is to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the existing empirical research pertaining to the correlation between the attributes of executive leadership teams (ELTs) and the performance outcomes of entrepreneurial enterprises. A comprehensive literature review was done, including 33 empirical studies that examine the relationship between ELT and academic achievement. The study included a meticulous analysis and synthesis of the quantitative research conducted within this domain. The findings derived from the comprehensive analysis of existing literature indicate that the association between ELTs (namely heterogeneity and demographics) and the operational outcomes of enterprises of entrepreneurs is not a simple or linear one. Consequently, more research is required to delve deeper into this domain and get a more comprehensive understanding of the underlying dynamics. The author examines the theoretical and empirical literature on the demography and heterogeneity of ELT in connection to the performance of companies. The study also explores potential moderators and mediators that influence the link between the composition of ELT and firms' performance.


Keywords


Executive Leadership Teams, Upper Echelon Theory, Social Capital Theory, Human Capital Theory, Executive Leadership Team Heterogeneity


  1. E. Hart, “Executive Leadership Teams: Exorcising demons, exercising minds,” Planning Review, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 14–46, Apr. 1995, doi: 10.1108/eb054514.
  2. S. Finkelstein and D. C. Hambrick, “Top-Management-Team Tenure and Organizational Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Managerial Discretion,” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 35, no. 3, p. 484, Sep. 1990, doi: 10.2307/2393314.
  3. R. Chaganti and R. Sambharya, “Strategic Orientation and Upper Echelon Characteristics.,” Academy of Management Proceedings, vol. 1986, no. 1, pp. 2–6, Aug. 1986, doi: 10.5465/ambpp.1986.4978262.
  4. E. G. Cots, “Stakeholder social capital: a new approach to stakeholder theory,” Business Ethics: A European Review, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 328–341, Sep. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8608.2011.01635.x.
  5. J. Konings, “Job Creation, Job Destruction and Employment Growth in Transition Countries in the 90’s,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2001, Published, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.265619.
  6. I. Blažková and O. Dvouletý, “Investigating the differences in entrepreneurial success through the firm-specific factors,” Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 154–176, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.1108/jeee-11-2017-0093.
  7. P. Gupta, “Top Management Team Heterogeneity, Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Financial Performance,” American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, vol. 09, no. 04, pp. 1076–1093, 2019, doi: 10.4236/ajibm.2019.94074.
  8. G. B. Dagnino and M. C. Cinici, “Strategic Heterogeneity and Firm Performance: A Coevolutionary View,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2007, Published, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.960635.
  9. I. Konstantinou and E. Miller, “Investigating work-integrated learning and its relevance to skills development in degree apprenticeships,” Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 767–781, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1108/heswbl-05-2020-0112.
  10. Y. Wang and C. Li, “Regulatory Focus of the Top Management Team and Firms’ Green Innovation,” Academy of Management Proceedings, vol. 2023, no. 1, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.5465/amproc.2023.11046abstract.
  11. B. H. Sparks and J. T. McCann, “Factors influencing business intelligence system use in decision making and organisational performance,” International Journal of Sustainable Strategic Management, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 31, 2015, doi: 10.1504/ijssm.2015.074604.
  12. K. Barnett and J. McCormick, “Leadership and Team Dynamics in Senior Executive Leadership Teams,” Educational Management Administration & Leadership, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 653–671, Sep. 2012, doi: 10.1177/1741143212456909.
  13. M. W. Odhiambo, H. G. Gachoka, and C. M. Rambo, “Relationship between Age Diversity and Employee Performance of Public Universities in Western Kenya,” International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, vol. 8, no. 11, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.6007/ijarbss/v8-i11/4897.
  14. A. Szopa, T. Marek, and M. Fafrowicz, “Socio-cultural Circumstances to Establish University Spin-off Companies,” Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 3, pp. 3677–3681, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.780.
  15. S. Mohammed and S. Nadkarni, “Temporal Diversity and Team Performance: The Moderating Role of Team Temporal Leadership,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 489–508, Jun. 2011, doi: 10.5465/amj.2011.61967991.
  16. J.-F. Harvey, “Microfoundations of sensing capabilities: From managerial cognition to team behavior,” Strategic Organization, p. 147612702211429, Dec. 2022, doi: 10.1177/14761270221142959.
  17. E. M. Al-Matari, “Do corporate governance and top management team diversity have a financial impact among financial sector? A further analysis,” Cogent Business & Management, vol. 9, no. 1, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1080/23311975.2022.2141093.
  18. M. A. Zimmerman, “The Influence of Top Management Team Heterogeneity on the Capital Raised through an Initial Public Offering,” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 391–414, May 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00233.x.
  19. M. Lurie, “Toward A Survey of Faculty-Turnover Rates: Increasing the Effectiveness of Manpower Management in Higher Education,” The Journal of Higher Education, vol. 37, no. 7, p. 389, Oct. 1966, doi: 10.2307/1979091.
  20. P. Koeppel, “The Business Case for Cultural Diversity: Satisfaction, Market Orientation and International Success,” The International Journal of Diversity in Organizations, Communities, and Nations: Annual Review, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 311–320, 2008, doi: 10.18848/1447-9532/cgp/v07i06/39499.
  21. N. Sayyad, “The Impact Of Competitive Strategies, And Strategic Human Resource Management On Firm Performance Of Palestine,” Archives of Business Research, vol. 5, no. 1, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.14738/abr.51.2464.
  22. Geevarghese and R. B. Pathmu, “Effect of Tenure on Executives’ Organizational Identification—An Empirical Study in the Aviation Sector Among the Junior and Middle Level Executives Employed in Aviation Sector Organizations Across India,” Journal of Computational and Theoretical Nanoscience, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 3587–3593, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1166/jctn.2018.7669.
  23. L. Garlappi and Z. Song, “Sales & Marketing Workforce Growth and Firm Performance,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2021, Published, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3914408.
  24. A. Faber and F. Walter, “The Curvilinear Relationship between Age and Emotional Aperture: The Moderating Role of Agreeableness,” Frontiers in Psychology, vol. 8, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01200.
  25. A. E. Randel and K. S. Jaussi, “Functional Background Identity, Diversity, and Individual Performance in Cross-Functional Teams,” Academy of Management Journal, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 763–774, Dec. 2003, doi: 10.5465/30040667.
  26. S. S. Uno, H. Supratikno, G. S. S. Ugut, I. Bernarto, F. Antonio, and Y. Hasbullah, “The effects of entrepreneurial values and entrepreneurial orientation, with environmental dynamism and resource availability as moderating variables, on the financial performance and its impacts on firms’ future intention: Empirical evidences from Indonesian state-owned enterprises,” Management Science Letters, pp. 1537–1548, 2021, doi: 10.5267/j.msl.2020.12.019.
  27. N. C. Wallis, F. J. Yammarino, and A. Feyerherm, “Individualized leadership: A qualitative study of senior executive leaders,” The Leadership Quarterly, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 182–206, Feb. 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.12.015.
  28. M. Capasso and M. Rybalka, “Innovation Pattern Heterogeneity: Data-Driven Retrieval of Firms’ Approaches to Innovation,” Businesses, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 54–81, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.3390/businesses2010004.
  29. S. MacCurtain, P. C. Flood, N. Ramamoorthy, M. A. West, and J. F. Dawson, “The Top Management Team, Reflexivity, Knowledge Sharing and New Product Performance: A Study of the Irish Software Industry,” Creativity and Innovation Management, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 219–232, Aug. 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00564.x.
  30. Z. Ullah, “Sustainable product attributes and firm performance: The moderating role of marketing resource intensity,” Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 4107–4120, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.1002/bse.2859.
  31. T. De Schryver, “The Impact of Attainment Discrepancy After Benchmarking on Changes in the Business Portfolio in Diversified Firms,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2006, Published, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.918529.
  32. T. S. Agustina and D. S. Fauzia, “The Need For Achievement, Risk-Taking Propensity, And Entrepreneurial Intention Of The Generation Z,” Risenologi, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 96–106, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.47028/j.risenologi.2021.61.161.
  33. G. A. Corrado, “The Achievement Paradox: A Theoretical Divergence between Proficiency and Achievement that Might Be Responsible for Part of the Achievement Gap,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2008, Published, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1284563.
  34. S. Elbanna, “Slack, Planning and Organizational Performance: Evidence from the Arab Middle East,” European Management Review, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 99–115, Mar. 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1740-4762.2012.01028.x.
  35. P. Saling, “Sustainability management in strategic decision-making processes,” uwfUmweltWirtschaftsForum, Jun. 2017, Published, doi: 10.1007/s00550-017-0461-8.

Acknowledgements


The authors would like to thank to the reviewers for nice comments on the manuscript.


Funding


No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.


Ethics declarations


Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.


Availability of data and materials


No data available for above study.


Author information


Contributions

All authors have equal contribution in the paper and all authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


Corresponding author


Rights and permissions


Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NoDerivs is a more restrictive license. It allows you to redistribute the material commercially or non-commercially but the user cannot make any changes whatsoever to the original, i.e. no derivatives of the original work. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/


Cite this article


Wei Bu and Guoming Bao, “A Review of Executive Leadership Charateristics and Performance of Firms”, Journal of Enterprise and Business Intelligence, vol.3, no.1, pp. 033-043, January 2023. doi: 10.53759/5181/JEBI202303004.


Copyright


© 2023 Wei Bu and Guoming Bao. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.