Journal of Enterprise and Business Intelligence


The Impact of Internal and External Coordination on Organizational Performance



Journal of Enterprise and Business Intelligence

Received On : 15 May 2022

Revised On : 08 July 2022

Accepted On : 25 July 2022

Published On : 05 January 2023

Volume 03, Issue 01

Pages : 023-032


Abstract


Coordination is a managerial activity that facilitates the harmonious collaboration of many departments and groups within an organization. Consequently, a cohesive and coordinated effort is seen among the personnel, collectives, and divisions. Organizational performance pertains to the overall effectiveness of an organization in terms of doing its daily responsibilities and achieving its predetermined goals. The process of evaluating an organization's performance entails the comparison of its realized outputs or outcomes with the initially anticipated ones. Managers or company owners engage in the evaluation of an organization's performance for many notable purposes, including the justification of capital use, identification of problematic areas to inform management decision-making, and the assurance of efficient utilization of organizational resources. The definition of success for a firm might vary depending on its underlying objectives. An organization encompasses several elements that contribute to its breadth and complexity. Hence, recognizing coordination as a fundamental factor in attaining a harmonized company performance is very desirable. The presence of companies signifies the aspiration to meet various requirements. Insufficient attention is often given to the fundamental structures required for fulfilling these objectives. The inquiries pertaining to rivalry, performance, and expectations are most effectively addressed via the establishment of a robust network including people, resources, and concepts. The primary finding of the study demonstrates that the establishment of efficient and effective connections between the exterior and internal components of an organization contributes to the mitigation of both internal and external complexity.


Keywords


Organizational Performance, Organization, Coordination, Performance and Trust, Intra and Inter Organizational Collaboration


  1. N. Hasche, L. Höglund, and M. Mårtensson, “Intra-organizational trust in public organizations – the study of interpersonal trust in both vertical and horizontal relationships from a bidirectional perspective,” Public Management Review, vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 1768–1788, May 2020, doi: 10.1080/14719037.2020.1764081.
  2. J. H. Gittell and L. Weiss, “Coordination Networks Within and Across Organizations: A Multi-level Framework*,” Journal of Management Studies, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 127–153, Jan. 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00424.x.
  3. I. Pouwels and F. Koster, “Inter-organizational cooperation and organizational innovativeness. A comparative study,” International Journal of Innovation Science, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 184–204, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1108/ijis-01-2017-0003.
  4. J. Brüning, J. Reissland, and D. Manzey, “Individual preferences for task coordination strategies in multitasking: exploring the link between preferred modes of processing and strategies of response organization,” Psychological Research, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 577–591, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01291-7.
  5. B. Voytek, “Social Media, Open Science, and Data Science Are Inextricably Linked,” Neuron, vol. 96, no. 6, pp. 1219–1222, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.11.015.
  6. K. Kwon and D. E. Rupp, “High-performer turnover and firm performance: The moderating role of human capital investment and firm reputation,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 129–150, May 2012, doi: 10.1002/job.1804.
  7. J. M. Vigil and P. Coulombe, “Intra-regional assortative sociality may be better explained by social network dynamics rather than pathogen risk avoidance,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 96–97, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1017/s0140525x11001087.
  8. S. Tasselli, P. Zappa, and A. Lomi, “Bridging Cultural Holes in Organizations: The Dynamic Structure of Social Networks and Organizational Vocabularies Within and Across Subunits,” Organization Science, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1292–1312, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1287/orsc.2019.1352.
  9. F. Poyatos, “The deeper levels of face-to-face interaction,” Language & Communication, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 111–131, Jan. 1985, doi: 10.1016/0271-5309(85)90004-7.
  10. W. Verbeke, M. Volgering, and M. Hessels, “Exploring the Conceptual Expansion within the Field of Organizational Behaviour: Organizational Climate and Organizational Culture,” Journal of Management Studies, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 303–329, May 1998, doi: 10.1111/1467-6486.00095
  11. A. Randrianasolo and A. A. Randrianasolo, “Understanding the role of organizational legitimacy within the realm of the community-based conservation approach,” Madagascar Conservation & Development, vol. 12, no. 1, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.4314/mcd.v12i1.2.
  12. M. Jassowski, “Organizational Dynamics: Understanding the Impact of Organizational Structure in Team Productivity,” IEEE Design & Test, pp. 1–1, 2013, doi: 10.1109/mdt.2012.1.
  13. R. Sweetow and J. H. Sabes, “The Communication Confidence Profile: A vital, but overlooked subjective domain,” The Hearing Journal, vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 17–18, Dec. 2010, doi: 10.1097/01.hj.0000391532.75976.e7.
  14. A. Etzioni, “Mixed-Scanning: A ‘Third’ Approach to Decision-Making,” Public Administration Review, vol. 27, no. 5, p. 385, Dec. 1967, doi: 10.2307/973394.
  15. H. Piezunka and O. Schilke, “The Dual Function of Organizational Structure: Aggregating and Shaping Individuals’ Votes,” Organization Science, Feb. 2023, Published, doi: 10.1287/orsc.2023.1653.
  16. P. K. Panday and I. Jamil, “Challenges of Coordination in Implementing Urban Policy: The Bangladesh Experience,” Public Organization Review, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 155–176, May 2010, doi: 10.1007/s11115-010-0116-5.
  17. E. Babbitt and F. O. Hampson, “Conflict Resolution as a Field of Inquiry: Practice Informing Theory,” International Studies Review, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 46–57, Mar. 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2486.2010.00997.x.
  18. D. J. Adriaenssen, D. A. Johannessen, and J.-A. Johannessen, “Knowledge management and performance: developing a theoretical approach to knowledge workers’ productivity, and practical tools for managers,” Problems and Perspectives in Management, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 667–676, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.21511/ppm.14(3-3).2016.10.
  19. J. Hilden, “What Properties Should an Overall Measure of Test Performance Possess?,” Clinical Chemistry, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 471–472, Feb. 2005, doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2004.041376.
  20. M. Droz, N. Senn, and C. Cohidon, “Communication, continuity and coordination of care are the most important patients’ values for family medicine in a fee-for-services health system,” BMC Family Practice, vol. 20, no. 1, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0895-2.
  21. B. B. Johnson and M. P. White, “The Importance of Multiple Performance Criteria for Understanding Trust in Risk Managers,” Risk Analysis, vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 1099–1115, Apr. 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01405.x.
  22. D. Hansen, “The Ambivalent Role of Punishment in Post-Merger Coordination and the New Approach of the 2010 US Horizontal Merger Guidelines,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2012, Published, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2208500.
  23. F. Calefato and F. Lanubile, “Establishing personal trust‐based connections in distributed teams,” Internet Technology Letters, vol. 1, no. 4, Sep. 2017, doi: 10.1002/itl2.6.
  24. T. E. Dumm, “Working Together Works: Regional Collaboration in Central Tennessee,” Proceedings of the Water Environment Federation, vol. 2016, no. 1, pp. 1170–1177, Jan. 2016, doi: 10.2175/193864716821123783.
  25. A. Perrels, “Reconciling competitiveness and environmental objectives,” Applied Energy, vol. 76, no. 1–3, pp. 75–87, Sep. 2003, doi: 10.1016/s0306-2619(03)00049-7.
  26. T. Hai, A. Yusof, S. Ismail, and L. Wei, “A Conceptual Study of Key Barriers in Construction Project Coordination,” Journal of Organizational Management Studies, pp. 1–14, Jun. 2012, doi: 10.5171/2012.795679.
  27. M. J. Velez, “The relationship between abusive supervision and organizational trust: The role of subordinates’ self-esteem,” Análise Psicológica, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 181–197, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.14417/ap.1738.
  28. S. Santana and P. Redondo, “Process mapping: a tool to foster intra- and inter-organizational coordination in primary care,” Family Medicine & Primary Care Review, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 41–46, 2018, doi: 10.5114/fmpcr.2017.72150.
  29. A. Molenveld, K. Verhoest, J. Voets, and T. Steen, “Images of Coordination: How Implementing Organizations Perceive Coordination Arrangements,” Public Administration Review, vol. 80, no. 1, pp. 9–22, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.1111/puar.13136.
  30. A. Gutterman, “Diversity and Inclusion in the Workplace,” SSRN Electronic Journal, 2022, Published, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4085736.
  31. A. Sankowska, “How Organizational Trust Affects the Market Position: The Mediating Role of Innovativeness and Operational Efficiency. Empirical Results,” Innovar, vol. 26, no. 61, pp. 9–24, Jul. 2016, doi: 10.15446/innovar.v26n61.57117.
  32. S. Augustinsson, U. Ericsson, and P. Pettersson, “On the organisation of sustainable prerequisites for the subjective well-being and growth of individuals,” Vulnerable Groups & Inclusion, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 18938, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.3402/vgi.v3i0.18938.
  33. S. W. Chae, “Perceived Proximity and Trust Network on Creative Performance in Virtual Collaboration Environment,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 91, pp. 807–812, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2016.07.084.

Acknowledgements


We would like to thank Reviewers for taking the time and effort necessary to review the manuscript. We sincerely appreciate all valuable comments and suggestions, which helped us to improve the quality of the manuscript.


Funding


No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.


Ethics declarations


Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.


Availability of data and materials


No data available for above study.


Author information


Contributions

All authors have equal contribution in the paper and all authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


Corresponding author


Rights and permissions


Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NoDerivs is a more restrictive license. It allows you to redistribute the material commercially or non-commercially but the user cannot make any changes whatsoever to the original, i.e. no derivatives of the original work. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/


Cite this article


Zhang Xinyu, “The Impact of Internal and External Coordination on Organizational Performance”, Journal of Enterprise and Business Intelligence, vol.3, no.1, pp. 023-032, January 2023. doi: 10.53759/5181/JEBI202303003.


Copyright


© 2023 Zhang Xinyu. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.