Journal of Enterprise and Business Intelligence


A Critical Review of Off Shoring Decision Making and Operationality in SMEs



Journal of Enterprise and Business Intelligence

Received On : 10 February 2022

Revised On : 15 April 2022

Accepted On : 25 May 2022

Published On : 05 October 2022

Volume 02, Issue 04

Pages : 188-199


Abstract


In today's global supply chains, which are complex, innovative, and competitive, outsourcing and offshoring have emerged as one of the most important and essential strategic initiatives. Among the long-term business initiatives taken by companies, this is one of the most prominent trends. Despite disagreements about outsourcing's effects on businesses, the practice continues in many companies. Companies of all sizes are increasingly relocating some of their manufacturing and sourcing operations overseas. Despite this, there is a dearth of research that focuses on offshoringdecision-makingprocedure as pertains to Small Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs). We surveyed French SMEs to learn how company size affects the outsourcing process, and we found that SMEs offshore a comparable share of procurement to larger organizations, though they tend to focus on fewer countries. We also showed that smaller businesses are not as well-equipped to make informed decisions about offshoring as larger ones are because they have less information about foreign countries.


Keywords


Outsourcing, Offshoring, Small medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), Analytical Net Process (ANP), Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP)


  1. X. Zhang and A. L. Phuan Tay, “A binocular vision system with attentive saccade and spatial variant vergence control,” Cybern. Syst., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 45–63, 2011.
  2. P. Shukla, K. Joshi, U. Rastogi, N. Kotkunde, S. K. Singh, and A. Saxena, “Conceptualisation of biaxial tensile test setup for sheet metal forming application using fuzzy analytical network process,” Adv. Mater. Process. Technol., pp. 1–14, 2020.
  3. M. J. Mol and C. Brewster, “The outsourcing strategy of local and multinational firms: A supply base perspective: Outsourcing strategy of local and multinational firms,” Glob. Strat. J., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 20–34, 2014.
  4. T. Lin and R. Hekkala, “Governance structure in IT outsourcing: a network perspective,” Strateg. Outsourcing Int. J., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 38–59, 2016.
  5. P. Kaushik, “Examining the impact of recruitment process outsourcing (RPO) motivators on success of relationship between client and service provider in India,” Int. J. Adv. Oper. Manag., vol. 14, no. 4, p. 1, 2022.
  6. H. Naseh, “Space mission definition based on Analytical Hierarchy Process (ahp) method: Space mission definition,” Int. j. anal. hierarchy process, vol. 10, no. 2, 2018.
  7. A. Gunasekaran, Z. Irani, K.-L. Choy, L. Filippi, and T. Papadopoulos, “Performance measures and metrics in outsourcing decisions: A review for research and applications,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., vol. 161, pp. 153–166, 2015.
  8. M. A. Cohen et al., “OM forum—benchmarking global production sourcing decisions: Where and why firms offshore and reshore,” Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 389–402, 2018.
  9. H. Gilani and S. Jamshed, “An exploratory study on the impact of recruitment process outsourcing on employer branding of an organisation,” Strateg. Outsourcing Int. J., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 303–323, 2016.
  10. C. Williams and S. Durst, “Exploring the transition phase in offshore outsourcing: Decision making amidst knowledge at risk,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 103, pp. 460–471, 2019.
  11. R. J. Trent and R. M. Monczka, “Purchasing and supply management: Trends and changes throughout the 1990s,” Int. j. purch. mater. manag., vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 2–11, 1998.
  12. K. De Pourcq, K. Verleye, B. Larivière, J. Trybou, and P. Gemmel, “Implications of customer participation in outsourcing non-core services to third parties,” J. Serv. Manag., vol. ahead-of-print, no. ahead-of-print, 2020.
  13. L. Yin and S. Furusaka, “The current status of subcontracting system and construction labor in China,” J. Archit. Plan. (Trans. AIJ), vol. 73, no. 625, pp. 641–648, 2008.
  14. S. Gopalakrishnan and H. Zhang, “The link between vendor certification and growth in IT outsourcing: a tale of two stories,” Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 57, no. 13, pp. 4228–4243, 2019.
  15. D. Morganti and P. De Giovanni, “Offshoring motivations driven by sustainability factors,” Res. Transp. Econ., no. 101222, p. 101222, 2022.
  16. A. Ishizaka and C. López, “Cost-benefit AHPSort for performance analysis of offshore providers,” Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 57, no. 13, pp. 4261–4277, 2019.
  17. H. Kaur, S. P. Singh, and A. Majumdar, “Modelling joint outsourcing and offshoring decisions,” Int. J. Prod. Res., vol. 57, no. 13, pp. 4278–4309, 2019.
  18. M. P. Uysal, “Machine learning-enabled healthcare information systems in view of Industrial Information Integration Engineering,” J. Ind. Inf. Integr., vol. 30, no. 100382, p. 100382, 2022.
  19. J. Kacani, L. Mukli, and E. Hysa, “A framework for short- vs. Long-term risk indicators for outsourcing potential for enterprises participating in global value chains: Evidence from Western Balkan countries,” J. Risk Fin. Manag., vol. 15, no. 9, p. 401, 2022.
  20. T. C. Y. Ho and L. Ran, “A study on the electrical system arrangement for offshore wind turbines and factors influencing the voltage level choice,” in 2012 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Power Electronics for Distributed Generation Systems (PEDG), 2012.
  21. S. A. Khan, S. Alkhatib, Z. Ammar, M. A. Moktadir, and A. Kumar, “Benchmarking the outsourcing factors of third-party logistics services selection: analysing influential strength and building a sustainable decision model,” Benchmarking, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1797–1825, 2022.
  22. M. Atto and C. Guy, “Routing protocols and quality of services for security based applications using wireless video sensor networks,” Netw. Protoc. Algorithm., vol. 6, no. 3, p. 119, 2014.
  23. N. Chaomuang, P. Singphithak, O. Laguerre, and R. Suwapanich, “Temperature control in a horticultural produce supply chain in Thailand and its influence on product quality,” Food Control, vol. 133, no. 108585, p. 108585, 2022.
  24. M. K. Witek-Hajduk, A. M. Grudecka, and A. Napiórkowska, “E-commerce in the internet-enabled foreign expansion of Polish fashion brands owned by SMEs,” J. Fashion Mark. Manag., vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 51–66, 2022.
  25. “Buying in or selling out?: How to effectively employ political strategies,” Strateg. dir., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 7–9, 2015.
  26. J.-H. Ma and Y.-H. Ahn, “Location efficiencies of host countries for strategic offshoring decisions amid wealth creation opportunities and supply chain risks,” J Korea Trade, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 21–47, 2021.
  27. A. H. Musa, F. N. Baharuddin, A. N. Rosle, S. S. Ibrahim, and S. N. Syed Noh, “The role of social media and religious awareness in purchasing decision on takaful insurance: A conceptual paper,” Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci., vol. 12, no. 6, 2022.
  28. C. T. Tchouwo, D. Poulin, and S. Veilleux, “Understanding the specific characteristics and determinants of open innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises: A systematic literature review,” Int. J. Innov. Manag., vol. 25, no. 06, p. 2150063, 2021.
  29. A. Allioui, B. Habba, and T. Berrada El Azizi, “Investment policy of Moroccan family businesses in times of crisis: the role of cultural logics, family reputation and imitation effect,” J. Fam. Bus. Manag., 2022.

Acknowledgements


Author(s) thanks to Dr.Damjan Bozinovic for this research completion and support.


Funding


No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.


Ethics declarations


Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.


Availability of data and materials


No data available for above study.


Author information


Contributions

All authors have equal contribution in the paper and all authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


Corresponding author


Rights and permissions


Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NoDerivs is a more restrictive license. It allows you to redistribute the material commercially or non-commercially but the user cannot make any changes whatsoever to the original, i.e. no derivatives of the original work. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/


Cite this article


Kjersti Bale and Damjan Bozinovic, “A Critical Review of Off Shoring Decision Making and Operationality in SMEs”, Journal of Enterprise and Business Intelligence, vol.2, no.4, pp. 188-199, October 2022. doi: 10.53759/5181/JEBI202202019.


Copyright


© 2022 Kjersti Bale and Damjan Bozinovic. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.