Since information from enterprises should be shared and exchanged in order to be understood and recognized, whereby unambiguous and transparent data is considered a vital requirement, information sharing has become crucial to the correct use of information assets. Sharing information may be seen as the most significant component of a company. Sharing or integrating information is used to bring together seemingly unrelated bodies of knowledge in an effort to enhance creativity. Development and training programs, reports, Information Technology (IT) platforms, official papers, and collaborative teams are all instances of information integration. It is possible to boost product and service quality, customer service responsiveness, innovation, and environmental sustainability via pervasive information integration. In this article, we take a look back at the revolutionary idea underpinning internal communication networks for Knowledge Management (KM), and Knowledge Representation (KR).
Keywords
Knowledge Management (KM), Knowledge Representation (KR), Information Technology (IT).
C. Findlay, H. G. Rammal, E. Rose, and V. Pereira, “Internationalization and knowledge management strategies of service firms: impact of regulatory environment in regional markets,” J. Knowl. Manag., vol. 26, no. 9, pp. 2177–2194, 2022.
E. Whelan and M. Carcary, “Integrating talent and knowledge management: where are the benefits?,” J. Knowl. Manag., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 675–687, 2011.
D. Ersel and Y. K. Atılgan, “An approach for knowledge acquisition from a survey data by conducting Bayesian network modeling, adopting the robust coplot method,” J. Appl. Stat., vol. 49, no. 16, pp. 4069–4096, 2022.
C.-M. von Behr, I. Cleaver, T. Minshall, and P. J. Clarkson, “Trust and knowledge sharing among hospitals during COVID-19: the compound effect of four barriers to organisational trust for knowledge sharing,” VINE j. inf. knowl. manag. syst., 2022.
L. Kwasniewicz, G. M. Wojcik, P. Schneider, A. Kawiak, and A. Wierzbicki, “What to believe? Impact of knowledge and message length on neural activity in message credibility evaluation,” Front. Hum. Neurosci., vol. 15, p. 659243, 2021.
C. R. Jones, “Taking without consent: Stolen knowledge and the place of abstractions and assessment in situated learning,” in Proceedings of the 1999 conference on Computer support for collaborative learning - CSCL ’99, 1999.
J. Carlsson Hauff and J. Nilsson, “Students’ experience of making and receiving peer assessment: the effect of self-assessed knowledge and trust,” Assess. Eval. High. Educ., vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 959–971, 2022.
A. Alghail, L. Yao, M. Abbas, and Y. Baashar, “Assessment of knowledge process capabilities toward project management maturity: an empirical study,” J. Knowl. Manag., vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 1207–1234, 2022.
J. Thornhill, M. Judd, and D. Clements, “CHSRF knowledge transfer: (re)introducing the self-assessment tool that is helping decision-makers assess their organization’s capacity to use research,” Healthc. Q., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 22–24, 2009.
Haldorai, A. Ramu, and S. Murugan, “Social Relationship Ranking on the Smart Internet,” Computing and Communication Systems in Urban Development, pp. 141–159, 2019. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-26013-2_7
W. Wu, “Injury analysis based on machine learning in NBA data,” J. data anal. inf. process., vol. 08, no. 04, pp. 295–308, 2020.
A. Goriss-Hunter, P. Sellings, and A. Echter, “Information communication technology in schools: Students exercise ‘digital agency’ to engage with learning,” Technol. Knowl. Learn., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 785–800, 2022.
Q. Shen, Y. Hua, Y. Huang, R. Ebstein, X. Yu, and Z. Wu, “Knowledge management and modern digital transformation of the property management industry in China,” J. Knowl. Manag., vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 2133–2144, 2022.
Q. Chen, “Comprehensive evaluation of businesses strategy and E-commerce performance in SMEs: A corporate social responsibility perspective,” Int. J. Hybrid Inf. Technol., vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 361–370, 2016.
D. Giampaoli, M. Ciambotti, and N. Bontis, “Knowledge management, problem solving and performance in top Italian firms,” J. Knowl. Manag., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 355–375, 2017.
S. B. Memon, Shah Abdul Latif University, Pakistan, W. H. Rizvi, S. Sumaiya, Institute of Business Administration, Karachi, Pakistan, and Shah Abdul Latif University, Pakistan, “Operationalization of knowledge management in knowledge-intensive Pakistani banks: a qualitative case study,” Knowl. Perform. Manag., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 36–45, 2017.
P. L. Mkhize, “Effect of social trust on health information exchange in social network sites,” S. Afr. J. Inf. Manag., vol. 24, no. 1, 2022.
J. Goedert, “Lessons from the HIE front. An insurer shares experiences after spending $50 million to jump-start information exchanges,” Health Data Manag., vol. 16, no. 11, p. 69, 2008.
G. Haltiwanger, R. E. Landaeta, C. A. Pinto, and A. Tolk, “Understanding the relationship between Risk Management and Knowledge Management: a literature review and extension,” Int. J. Knowl. Manag. Stud., vol. 4, no. 3, p. 281, 2010.
R. Agrifoglio, C. Metallo, and P. di Nauta, “Understanding knowledge management in public organizations through the organizational knowing perspective: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis,” Public Organ. Rev., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 137–156, 2021.
Haldorai, A. Ramu, and S. Murugan, “Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Future Urban Development,” Computing and Communication Systems in Urban Development, pp. 91–113, 2019. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-26013-2_5.
О. М. Мухтарова, “Dairy productivity of cows of different genotypes for 305 days of 1 lactation in the conditions of the Moscow region,” NetherlandsConf, vol. 17, 2022.
P. Tyari, “Steps in Communication Process: Sender, Receiver etc,” Paper Tyari, 18-Mar-2019. [Online]. Available: https://www.papertyari.com/general-awareness/management/steps-communication-process/. [Accessed: 02-Dec-2022].
“Rules and procedures,” Econometricsociety.org. [Online]. Available: https://www.econometricsociety.org/society/organization-and-governance/rules-and-procedures. [Accessed: 02-Dec-2022].
K. Kirchner, C. Ipsen, and A. R. Andersen, “Knowledge sharing challenges in hybrid knowledge work: Lessons from Denmark,” Proc. Eur. conf. knowl. manag., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 638–645, 2022.
F. Dhombres, J. Charlet, and Section Editors for the IMIA Yearbook Section on Knowledge Representation and Management, “Formal medical Knowledge Representation supports deep learning algorithms, bioinformatics pipelines, genomics data analysis, and big data processes: Findings from the 2019 IMIA Yearbook section on Knowledge Representation and Management,” Yearb. Med. Inform., vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 152–155, 2019.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Reviewers for taking the time and effort necessary to review the manuscript. We sincerely appreciate all valuable comments and suggestions, which helped us to improve the quality of the manuscript.
Funding
No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Availability of data and materials
No data available for above study.
Author information
Contributions
All authors have equal contribution in the paper and all authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Susan Bagatto
Susan Bagatto
Associate of Arts, University Canada West, V6Z 0E5, Canada.
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you
give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and
indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article‟s
Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the
article‟s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the
permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Cite this article
Susan Bagatto, “Theoretical Framework of Knowledge Representation for Information Sharing”, Journal of Computing and Natural Science, vol.3, no.2, pp. 058-068, April 2023. doi: 10.53759/181X/JCNS202303006.
