Journal of Computing and Natural Science


Analysis on Intelligent Agent based Approach for Software Engineering



Journal of Computing and Natural Science

Received On : 25 May 2022

Revised On : 22 June 2022

Accepted On : 28 July 2022

Published On : 05 October 2022

Volume 02, Issue 04

Pages : 175-186


Abstract


A broad area of research, known as "Agent-Based Computing", focuses on developing "agent-based" intelligent software using agent-based techniques. However, there is a scarcity of research focusing on providing enough evidence of the superiority of agent-based techniques in creating complex software systems. This article has attempted to provide evidence for why agent-based techniques are superior to traditional methods for creating complex software systems, such as control systems. A case of a distinct agent-based control system (the power transportation management system used by Iber-26 drola) is used to illustrate these broader principles. This line of reasoning allows advocates of complex software engineering paradigms to accurately assert that their method can replicate the essential ideas behind agent-based computing. When broken down to their most basic components, agent-based systems are just computer programmes, and every programme has the same set of computable functionalities. The value of a paradigm lies in the way of thinking and the tools it teaches to programmers. As such, agent-based ideas and approaches are not just an extension of those now accessible within existing paradigms, but also well suited to the development of large, networked systems.


Keywords


Agents, Agent-Based Software Engineering, Agent-Based Systems, Agent-Based Computing, Agent-Based Approach.


  1. P. Lopez-Merino and J. Rouchier, “The diffusion of goods with multiple characteristics and price premiums: an agent-based model,” Appl. Netw. Sci., vol. 7, no. 1, 2022.
  2. Y.-J. Kang, Y. Noh, M.-S. Jang, S. Park, and J.-T. Kim, “Hierarchical level fault detection and diagnosis of ship engine systems,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 213, no. 118814, p. 118814, 2023.
  3. D. Morales-Silva and D. Gao, “Canonical duality theory and triality for solving general global optimization problems in complex systems,” Math. Mech. Complex Syst., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 139–161, 2015.
  4. G. C. Fox and W. Furmanski, “A string theory for time dependent complex systems and its application to automatic decomposition,” in Proceedings of the third conference on Hypercube concurrent computers and applications Architecture, software, computer systems, and general issues -, 1988.
  5. W. Cazzola, S. Ghosh, M. Al-Refai, and G. Maurina, “Bridging the model-to-code abstraction gap with fuzzy logic in model-based regression test selection,” Softw. Syst. Model., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 207–224, 2022.
  6. C. Tsagkani and A. Tsalgatidou, “Process model abstraction for rapid comprehension of complex business processes,” Inf. Syst., vol. 103, no. 101818, p. 101818, 2022.
  7. M. Khazaaleh, S. Samarasinghe, and D. Kulasiri, “A new hierarchical approach to multi-level model abstraction for simplifying ODE models of biological networks and a case study: The G1/S Checkpoint/DNA damage signalling pathways of mammalian cell cycle,” Biosystems., vol. 203, no. 104374, p. 104374, 2021.
  8. V. Rapuano and A. Valickas, “Application of complexity theory to organizational career management system’s development,” Manag. Organ. Syst. Res., vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 47–64, 2021.
  9. V. L. T. Scaglione, V. Meyer Jr, and D. F. Mamédio, “Improvisation in higher education management: Coping with complexity and organizational dynamics,” Glob. J. Flex. Syst. Manag., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 291–302, 2019.
  10. G.-F. Deng and W.-T. Lin, “Notice of Retraction: Agent-based modeling of supply chain network for adaptive pricing strategy,” in 2011 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Science, 201
  11. K. Ransikarbum, N. Kim, S. Ha, R. A. Wysk, and L. Rothrock, “A highway-driving system design viewpoint using an agent-based modeling of an affordance-based finite state automata,” IEEE Access, vol. 6, pp. 2193–2205, 2018.
  12. C. Zato, A. de Luis, J. F. De Paz, and V. F. López, “Dynamic assignation of roles and tasks in virtual organizations of agents,” in Advances in Intelligent and Soft Computing, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2011, pp. 59–68.
  13. S. Achter, M. Borit, E. Chattoe-Brown, and P.-O. Siebers, “RAT-RS: a reporting standard for improving the documentation of data use in agent-based modelling,” Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol., vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 517–540, 2022.
  14. V. Sharma et al., “OGAS: Omni-directional Glider Assisted Scheme for autonomous deployment of sensor nodes in open area wireless sensor network,” ISA Trans., 2022.
  15. Q. Wang, S. Jing, and A. K. Goel, “Co-designing AI agents to support social connectedness among online learners: Functionalities, social characteristics, and ethical challenges,” in Designing Interactive Systems Conference, 2022.
  16. J. Watts, R. E. Morss, C. M. Barton, and J. L. Demuth, “Conceptualizing and implementing an agent-based model of information flow and decision making during hurricane threats,” Environ. Model. Softw., vol. 122, no. 104524, p. 104524, 2019.
  17. E. Sulis and K. Taveter, “Agent-Oriented Modeling,” in Agent-Based Business Process Simulation, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022, pp. 77–104.
  18. C.-Y. Lin, Y. C. E. Yang, K. Malek, and J. C. Adam, “An investigation of coupled natural human systems using a two-way coupled agent-based modeling framework,” Environ. Model. Softw., vol. 155, no. 105451, p. 105451, 2022.
  19. N. D. Conrad, J. Köppl, and A. Djurdjevac, “Feedback loops in opinion dynamics of agent-based models with multiplicative noise,” arXiv [math.DS], 2022.
  20. W. Zhao, Y. Li, B. Xu, and H. Yang, “Experimental investigation and modeling of vapor-liquid equilibria for Bi–Zn and Bi–Sn–Zn systems at 10 Pa,” CALPHAD, vol. 74, no. 102287, p. 102287, 2021.
  21. I. A. Bashkirtseva, “Analysis of stochastically forced equilibria and noise-induced transitions in nonlinear discrete systems,” Comput. Res. Model., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 559–571, 2013.
  22. T. A. AL-Qutami, R. Ibrahim, I. Ismail, and M. A. Ishak, “Virtual multiphase flow metering using diverse neural network ensemble and adaptive simulated annealing,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 93, pp. 72–85, 2018.
  23. “Call for papers: Special issue on intelligent optimization, modeling, and simulation with knowledge for complex systems,” Complex Syst. Model. Simul., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 253–254, 2021.
  24. P. Zimmermann et al., “The interplay of familial depression liability and adverse events in predicting the first onset of depression during a 10-year follow-up,” Biol. Psychiatry, vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 406–414, 2008.
  25. D. Isern, D. Sánchez, and A. Moreno, “Organizational structures supported by agent-oriented methodologies,” J. Syst. Softw., vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 169–184, 2011.
  26. Z. Wang, Y. Tang, X. Chen, X. Men, J. Cao, and H. Wang, “Optimized daily dispatching strategy of building- integrated energy systems considering vehicle to grid technology and room temperature control,” Energies, vol. 11, no. 5, p. 1287, 2018.
  27. G. Beltrao, I. Paramonova, and S. Sousa, “User interface design for AI-based clinical decision-support system : Preliminary study,” in 2022 17th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), 2022.
  28. B. Liu, M. Polukarov, C. Ventre, L. Li, and L. Kanthan, “Agent-based markets: Equilibrium strategies and robustness,” in Proceedings of the Second ACM International Conference on AI in Finance, 2021.
  29. X. Guo et al., “An agent-based dynamic reliability modeling method for multistate systems considering fault propagation: A case study on subsea Christmas trees,” Process Saf. Environ. Prot., vol. 158, pp. 20–33, 2022.
  30. T. Jorquera, J.-P. Georgé, M.-P. Gleizes, and C. Régis, “Agent-based natural domain modeling for cooperative continuous optimization,” in Computational Collective Intelligence. Technologies and Applications, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013, pp. 437–446.
  31. S. Pacheco-Gutierrez, UK Atomic Energy Authority, Remote Applications in Challenging Environments, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, Oxfordshire OX14 3DB, United Kingdom., I. Caliskanelli, and R. Skilton, “Point cloud compression and transmission for remote handling applications,” J. Softw., pp. 14–23, 2021.

Acknowledgements


We would like to thank Reviewers for taking the time and effort necessary to review the manuscript. We sincerely appreciate all valuable comments and suggestions, which helped us to improve the quality of the manuscript.


Funding


No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.


Ethics declarations


Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.


Availability of data and materials


No data available for above study.


Author information


Contributions

All authors have equal contribution in the paper and all authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


Corresponding author


Rights and permissions


Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NoDerivs is a more restrictive license. It allows you to redistribute the material commercially or non-commercially but the user cannot make any changes whatsoever to the original, i.e. no derivatives of the original work. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/


Cite this article


Anandakumar Haldorai, “Analysis on Intelligent Agent based Approach for Software Engineering", vol.2, no.4, pp. 175-186, October 2022. doi: 10.53759/181X/JCNS202202020.


Copyright


© 2022 Anandakumar Haldorai. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.