Journal of Enterprise and Business Intelligence


Assessing the Impact of Business Intelligence on Decision Support Environments in Enterprise Systems



Journal of Enterprise and Business Intelligence

Received On : 27 April 2024

Revised On : 19 September 2024

Accepted On : 23 January 2025

Published On : 05 April 2025

Volume 05, Issue 02

Pages : 076-085


Abstract


This research paper aims at examining the effects of Business intelligence assessment on decision support systems of enterprise systems. The rationale for the study aims at understanding how BI capabilities affect decision making in organizations. The approach used in the paper included the analysis of prior works to build a strong research framework. Questionnaire was developed and mailed to IT Managers, Chief Information Officers and IT Project Managers of the Fortune 500 firms and received a total response rate of 41.90%, which was considered valid. To determine the key BI components and their relevance, an examination of the survey data was conducted with the help of factor analysis and hypothesis testing. Our results showed that the evaluation of BI capabilities plays a vital role in improving decision-support settings, as indicated by the Wald-Wolfowitz test and factor analysis. The study revealed six major factors that constitute 73.917% of the variation and are crucial to determine the intelligence levels of ES. These results highlight the importance of systematic BI assessment for enhancing organizational decision-making and lay the groundwork for creating better instruments to investigate and foster BI proficiency in ES.


Keywords


Business Intelligence, Knowledge, Knowledge Management, Business Analytics, Big Data, Decision Support Systems, Information Technology and Data Analysis Methodologies.


  1. D. J. Teece, “Strategies for Managing Knowledge Assets: the Role of Firm Structure and Industrial Context,” Long Range Planning, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 35–54, Feb. 2000, doi: 10.1016/s0024-6301(99)00117-x.
  2. K. L. Ashcraft, “The Glass Slipper: ‘Incorporating’ Occupational Identity in Management Studies,” the Academy of Management Review, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 6–31, Jan. 2013, doi: 10.5465/amr.2010.0219.
  3. S. Michie, L. Yardley, R. West, K. Patrick, and F. Greaves, “Developing and evaluating digital interventions to promote behavior change in health and health care: recommendations resulting from an international workshop,” JMIR. Journal of Medical Internet Research/Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 19, no. 6, p. e232, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.2196/jmir.7126.
  4. N. Anand, H. K. Gardner, and T. Morris, “Knowledge-Based Innovation: emergence and embedding of new practice areas in management consulting firms,” Academy of Management Journal/the Academy of Management Journal, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 406–428, Apr. 2007, doi: 10.5465/amj.2007.24634457.
  5. M. Alvesson, “ORGANIZATIONS AS RHETORIC: KNOWLEDGE‐INTENSIVE FIRMS AND THE STRUGGLE WITH AMBIGUITY,” Journal of Management Studies, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 997–1015, Nov. 1993, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1993.tb00476.x.
  6. D. Aburous and R. Kamla, “Linguistic tensions in a professional accounting field: English linguistic capital, hierarchy, prestige, and distinction among accountants†,” Contemporary Accounting Research, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 1120–1149, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1111/1911-3846.12751.
  7. C. McInerney, “Knowledge management and the dynamic nature of knowledge,” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 53, no. 12, pp. 1009–1018, Jul. 2002, doi: 10.1002/asi.10109.
  8. N. K. Kakabadse, A. Kouzmin, and A. Kakabadse, “From tacit knowledge to knowledge management: leveraging invisible assets,” Knowledge and Process Management, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 137–154, Jul. 2001, doi: 10.1002/kpm.120.
  9. M. Alavi and D. E. Leidner, “Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and research issues,” Management Information Systems Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 1, p. 107, Mar. 2001, doi: 10.2307/3250961.
  10. C. R. McInerney and M. E. D. Koenig, “Knowledge Management (KM) Processes in Organizations: theoretical foundations and practice,” Synthesis Lectures on Information Concepts, Retrieval, and Services, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–96, Jan. 2011, doi: 10.2200/s00323ed1v01y201012icr018.
  11. L. G. A. Beesley and C. Cooper, “Defining knowledge management (KM) activities: towards consensus,” Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 48–62, May 2008, doi: 10.1108/13673270810875859.
  12. B. Gupta, L. S. Iyer, and J. E. Aronson, “Knowledge management: practices and challenges,” Industrial Management & Data Systems, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 17–21, Feb. 2000, doi: 10.1108/02635570010273018.
  13. Isik, M. C. Jones, and A. Sidorova, “BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE (BI) SUCCESS AND THE ROLE OF BI CAPABILITIES,” Intelligent Systems in Accounting Finance & Management, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 161–176, Oct. 2011, doi: 10.1002/isaf.329.
  14. N. W. Alkharouf, D. C. Jamison, and B. F. Matthews, “Online Analytical Processing (OLAP): a fast and effective data mining tool for gene expression databases,” BioMed Research International, vol. 2005, no. 2, pp. 181–188, Jan. 2000, doi: 10.1155/jbb.2005.181.
  15. C. Romero and S. Ventura, “Data mining in education,” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 12–27, Dec. 2012, doi: 10.1002/widm.1075.
  16. D. A. Green, “Statistical studies of supernova remnants,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 209, no. 3, pp. 449–478, Aug. 1984, doi: 10.1093/mnras/209.3.449.
  17. W. Raghupathi and V. Raghupathi, “Contemporary Business Analytics: An Overview,” Data, vol. 6, no. 8, p. 86, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.3390/data6080086.
  18. R. K. Rainer, C. A. Snyder, and H. H. Carr, “Risk analysis for information Technology,” Journal of Management Information Systems, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 129–147, Jun. 1991, doi: 10.1080/07421222.1991.11517914.
  19. W. Paulsson, “The complementary use of IS technologies to support flexibility and integration needs in budgeting,” 2013. [Online]. Available: https://lucris.lub.lu.se/ws/files/3909100/4022803.pdf

CRediT Author Statement


The author reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.


Acknowledgements


Authors thanks to School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences Engineering for this research support.


Funding


No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.


Ethics declarations


Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.


Availability of data and materials


No data available for above study.


Author information


Contributions

All authors have equal contribution in the paper and all authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


Corresponding author


Rights and permissions


Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NoDerivs is a more restrictive license. It allows you to redistribute the material commercially or non-commercially but the user cannot make any changes whatsoever to the original, i.e. no derivatives of the original work. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/


Cite this article


Arulmurugan Ramu, “Assessing the Impact of Business Intelligence on Decision Support Environments in Enterprise Systems”, Journal of Enterprise and Business Intelligence, vol.5, no.2, pp. 076-085, April 2025. doi: 10.53759/5181/JEBI202505008.


Copyright


© 2025 Arulmurugan Ramu. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.