Journal of Enterprise and Business Intelligence


Relationships Between GSCM, Technological Innovation and Green Performance in North Eastern Nigeria



Journal of Enterprise and Business Intelligence

Received On : 20 June 2024

Revised On : 12 August 2024

Accepted On : 06 October 2024

Published On : 05 April 2025

Volume 05, Issue 02

Pages : 064-075


Abstract


This research examines the correlation between Green Supply Chain Management Practices (GSCMP) practices, Technology Innovation (TECIN), and Green Performance (GP) among the manufacturers and suppliers in the North-Eastern Nigeria due to the growing environmental impacts of investments in the agricultural sector. An explanatory survey design was used and a structured questionnaire with 57 closed ended questions was employed to gather quantitative data from 1,028 firms in the sample which was derived from a stratified random sampling technique. The response rate was 24%, 173 fully completed questionnaires, which primarily targeted SMEs, and the key informants occupied the environmental management position. In addition, the structural model of the study was verified by means of Stone-Geisser’s Q² test, R² values, and boot-strap resampling techniques, showing that GSCM practices have significant positive correlations with TECIN (r = 0. 392, p > 0. 01), and GSCM practices and GP (p > 0. 01; r = 0. 335). In addition, the relationship of the mediation analysis showed that TECIN partially mediates the link between GSCM and GP; thus, while GSCM practices positively influence GP, this effect is even more pronounced when bolstered by TECIN. These findings affirm the fact that to gain a higher GP, both GSCM and TECIN strategies have to be aligned and implemented, hence the need for policies that encourage manufacturing sustainability and technology.


Keywords


Technology Innovation (TECIN), Green Performance (GP), Green Supply Chain Management Practices (GSCMP).


  1. J. Abbas, “Impact of total quality management on corporate green performance through the mediating role of corporate social responsibility,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 242, p. 118458, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118458.
  2. R. L. Ibrahim, U. Al-Mulali, I. Ozturk, A. K. Bello, and L. Raimi, “On the criticality of renewable energy to sustainable development: Do green financial development, technological innovation, and economic complexity matter for China?,” Renewable Energy, vol. 199, pp. 262–277, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.08.101.
  3. E. Williamson, “Transaction-Cost Economics: The governance of Contractual relations,” the Journal of Law & Economics/the Journal of Law & Economics, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 233–261, Oct. 1979, doi: 10.1086/466942.
  4. T. P. Seager, “The sustainability spectrum and the sciences of sustainability,” Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 17, no. 7, pp. 444–453, Sep. 2008, doi: 10.1002/bse.632.
  5. T. J. Tumpa, S. M. Ali, Md. H. Rahman, S. K. Paul, P. Chowdhury, and S. A. R. Khan, “Barriers to green supply chain management: An emerging economy context,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 236, p. 117617, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117617.
  6. T. A. Chin, H. H. Tat, and Z. Sulaiman, “Green supply chain management, environmental collaboration and sustainability performance,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 26, pp. 695–699, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2014.07.035.
  7. K. W. Green, P. J. Zelbst, J. Meacham, and V. S. Bhadauria, “Green supply chain management practices: impact on performance,” Supply Chain Management, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 290–305, Apr. 2012, doi: 10.1108/13598541211227126.
  8. C. Alayón, K. Säfsten, and G. Johansson, “Conceptual sustainable production principles in practice: Do they reflect what companies do?,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 141, pp. 693–701, Jan. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.0 79.
  9. M. L. Markus, “Power, politics, and MIS implementation,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 430–444, Jun. 1983, doi: 10.1145/358141.358148.
  10. R. B. Cooper and R. W. Zmud, “Information Technology Implementation Research: A Technological Diffusion approach,” Management Science, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 123–139, Feb. 1990, doi: 10.1287/mnsc.36.2.123.
  11. S. T. March and G. F. Smith, “Design and natural science research on information technology,” Decision Support Systems, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 251–266, Dec. 1995, doi: 10.1016/0167-9236(94)00041-2.
  12. S. Baron, A. Patterson, and K. Harris, “Beyond technology acceptance: understanding consumer practice,” International Journal of Service Industry Management, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 111–135, Mar. 2006, doi: 10.1108/09564230610656962.
  13. H. Trischler and H. Weinberger, “Engineering Europe: big technologies and military systems in the making of 20th century Europe,” History and Technology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 49–83, Mar. 2005, doi: 10.1080/07341510500037503.
  14. B. B. M. Shao and W. T. Lin, “Assessing output performance of information technology service industries: Productivity, innovation and catch-up,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 172, pp. 43–53, Feb. 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.10.026.
  15. P. De Wilde, “The gap between predicted and measured energy performance of buildings: A framework for investigation,” Automation in Construction, vol. 41, pp. 40–49, May 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.autcon.2014.02.009.
  16. Tariq, Y. F. Badir, W. Tariq, and U. S. Bhutta, “Drivers and consequences of green product and process innovation: A systematic review, conceptual framework, and future outlook,” Technology in Society, vol. 51, pp. 8–23, Nov. 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.06.002.
  17. G. Shi, S. C. L. Koh, J. Baldwin, and F. Cucchiella, “Natural resource based green supply chain management,” Supply Chain Management, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 54–67, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1108/13598541211212203.
  18. M. C. Gupta, “Environmental management and its impact on the operations function,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 34–51, Aug. 1995, doi: 10.1108/01443579510094071.
  19. E. Morgera and A. Savaresi, “A conceptual and legal perspective on the green economy,” Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 14–28, Apr. 2013, doi: 10.1111/reel.12016.
  20. S. Rahimifard, G. Coates, T. Staikos, C. Edwards, and M. Abu-Bakar, “Barriers, drivers and challenges for sustainable product recovery and recycling,” International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 80–90, Jun. 2009, doi: 10.1080/19397030903019766.
  21. F. E. Bowen, P. D. Cousins, R. C. Lamming, and A. C. Farukt, “THE ROLE OF SUPPLY MANAGEMENT CAPABILITIES IN GREEN SUPPLY,” Production and Operations Management, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 174–189, Jun. 2001, doi: 10.1111/j.1937-5956.2001.tb00077.x.
  22. C. C. Bozarth, D. P. Warsing, B. B. Flynn, and E. J. Flynn, “The impact of supply chain complexity on manufacturing plant performance,” Journal of Operations Management, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 78–93, Aug. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2008.07.003.
  23. G. Wandosell, M. C. Parra-Meroño, A. Alcayde, and R. Baños, “Green Packaging from Consumer and Business Perspectives,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 3, p. 1356, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.3390/su13031356.
  24. Y. Kazancoglu, I. Kazancoglu, and M. Sagnak, “A new holistic conceptual framework for green supply chain management performance assessment based on circular economy,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 195, pp. 1282–1299, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.015.
  25. R. A. Rupa and A. N. M. Saif, “Impact of Green Supply Chain Management (GSCM) on business performance and environmental sustainability: case of a developing country,” Business Perspectives and Research, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 140–163, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1177/2278533720983089.

CRediT Author Statement


The author reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.


Acknowledgements


Author(s) thanks to Northeastern University for research lab and equipment support.


Funding


No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.


Ethics declarations


Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.


Availability of data and materials


No data available for above study.


Author information


Contributions

All authors have equal contribution in the paper and all authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


Corresponding author


Rights and permissions


Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NoDerivs is a more restrictive license. It allows you to redistribute the material commercially or non-commercially but the user cannot make any changes whatsoever to the original, i.e. no derivatives of the original work. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/


Cite this article


Muhammad Adamu, “Relationships Between GSCM, Technological Innovation and Green Performance in North Eastern Nigeria”, Journal of Enterprise and Business Intelligence, vol.5, no.2, pp. 064-075, April 2025. doi: 10.53759/5181/JEBI202505007.


Copyright


© 2025 Muhammad Adamu. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.