All authors should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for the content. Authorship credit should be based on substantial contribution to conception and design, execution, or analysis and interpretation of data. All authors should be involved in drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content and must have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
The AnaPub Publications clearly defines below criteria, including:
Individuals who participated only in acquisition of funding, collection of data, or general supervision of a research group do not justify authorship. These individuals should be included in the Acknowledgements.
The corresponding author is the individual who takes primary responsibility for communication with the book during the manuscript submission, peer review, and publication process, and typically ensures that all the book chapter's administrative requirements, such as providing details of authorship, ethics committee approval, clinical trial registration documentation, and gathering conflict of interest forms and statements, are properly completed, although these duties may be delegated to one or more coauthors.
All contributors who do not meet the above criteria for authorship should be listed in the 'Acknowledgements'.
Other than in exceptional circumstances the book does not allow the addition or removal of author names after submission without a detailed explanation provided in writing. A satisfactory explanation for any proposed changes in authorship will be required.
Removal of an author requires a letter of consent from any person whose name has been removed, indicating that they agree to the removal of their name from the author list.
Owing to the complexity of these rules, we strongly advise authors to carefully assess the list of authors and work done in the paper to establish a fixed author list before submission and not to attempt to make changes later.
