This review article explores the impact of cladded cutting inserts on Cutting Force (CF) behavior in turning of alloy steels. The behavior of CFs in turning is an important factor for tool life, surface finish, chip formation, and the selection of tool materials. Cladded cutting inserts are increasingly popular in the turning process, as they offer improved effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. The review focuses on the current literature on the use of cladded cutting inserts in turning of alloy steels, and their impact on CFbehavior. The review begins by discussing the key principles of cladded cutting inserts, and their advantages over uncladded cutting inserts. The review then moves on to discuss the CFbehavior of cladded cutting inserts in turning of alloy steels. The review focuses on the influence of cutting variables, such as FR and DOC, on CFbehavior with cladded cutting inserts. The review also discusses the effect of coating type and coating thickness on CFbehavior. The review concludes by summarising the findings and providing recommendations for further research. Cladded cutting inserts offer several advantages over uncladded cutting inserts in turning of alloy steels. These include improved wear resistance, increased cutting velocity, reduced CFs, and improved tool life. The review examines the CFbehavior of cladded cutting inserts in turning of alloy steels, and the influence of various cutting variables, such as FR, DOC, coating type, and coating thickness. The review finds that the CFbehavior of cladded cutting inserts is significantly different to that of uncladded cutting inserts. The review also finds that the CFbehavior of cladded cutting inserts is affected by the cutting variables and the type and thickness of the coating. The review highlights that the use of cladded cutting inserts results in lower CFs, improved surface finish, and improved tool life. The review contributes to the current literature by providing an in-depth understanding of the CFbehavior of cladded cutting inserts in turning of alloy steels. The review provides valuable insight into the cutting behavior of cladded cutting inserts, and the influence of cutting variables and coating type and thickness. The review also highlights the potential benefits of using cladded cutting inserts in turning of alloy steels. The review concludes by providing recommendations for further research in this area.
Keywords
Coated Tool Inserts, Machining of Alloy Steels, Cutting Force Behaviour, Cutting Parameters, Coating Type, Coating Thickness.
B. Denkena, M.-A. Dittrich, S. Stamm, M. Wichmann, and S. Wilmsmeier, “Reprint of: Gentelligent processes in biologically inspired manufacturing,” CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, vol. 34, pp. 105–118, Aug. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cirpj.2021.06.006.
G. Aruquipa and F. Diaz, “An IoT architecture based on the control of Bio Inspired manufacturing system for the detection of anomalies with vibration sensors,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 200, pp. 438–450, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.242.
C. Cooper et al., “Convolutional neural network-based tool condition monitoring in vertical milling operations using acoustic signals,” Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 49, pp. 105–111, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.07.004.
C. Cheng, J. Li, Y. Liu, M. Nie, and W. Wang, “Deep convolutional neural network-based in-process tool condition monitoring in abrasive belt grinding,” Computers in Industry, vol. 106, pp. 1–13, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2018.12.002.
Z. Huang, J. Zhu, J. Lei, X. Li, and F. Tian, “Tool Wear Monitoring with Vibration Signals Based on Short-Time Fourier Transform and Deep Convolutional Neural Network in Milling,” Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2021, pp. 1–14, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1155/2021/9976939.
Z. Huang, J. Zhu, J. Lei, X. Li, and F. Tian, “Tool Wear Predicting Based on Multisensory Raw Signals Fusion by Reshaped Time Series Convolutional Neural Network in Manufacturing,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 178640–178651, 2019, doi: 10.1109/access.2019.2958330.
X.-C. Cao, B.-Q. Chen, B. Yao, and W.-P. He, “Combining translation-invariant wavelet frames and convolutional neural network for intelligent tool wear state identification,” Computers in Industry, vol. 106, pp. 71–84, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2018.12.018.
D. Wu, C. Jennings, J. Terpenny, S. Kumara, and R. X. Gao, “Cloud-Based Parallel Machine Learning for Tool Wear Prediction,” Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, vol. 140, no. 4, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.1115/1.4038002.
Z. Li, X. Liu, A. Incecik, M. K. Gupta, G. M. Królczyk, and P. Gardoni, “A novel ensemble deep learning model for cutting tool wear monitoring using audio sensors,” Journal of Manufacturing Processes, vol. 79, pp. 233–249, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.04.066.
K. Balachandar and R. Jegadeeshwaran, “Friction stir welding tool condition monitoring using vibration signals and Random forest algorithm – A Machine learning approach,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 46, pp. 1174–1180, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.061.
B. Lutz et al., “Benchmark of Automated Machine Learning with State-of-the-Art Image Segmentation Algorithms for Tool Condition Monitoring,” Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 51, pp. 215–221, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.031.
Q. Nazir and C. Shao, “Online tool condition monitoring for ultrasonic metal welding via sensor fusion and machine learning,” Journal of Manufacturing Processes, vol. 62, pp. 806–816, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2020.12.050.
Y. Zhou, B. Sun, and W. Sun, “A tool condition monitoring method based on two-layer angle kernel extreme learning machine and binary differential evolution for milling,” Measurement, vol. 166, p. 108186, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108186.
J. Sossenheimer, J. Walther, J. Fleddermann, and E. Abele, “A Sensor Reduced Machine Learning Approach for Condition-based Energy Monitoring for Machine Tools,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 81, pp. 570–575, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2019.03.157.
A. Caggiano, R. Angelone, F. Napolitano, L. Nele, and R. Teti, “Dimensionality Reduction of Sensorial Features by Principal Component Analysis for ANN Machine Learning in Tool Condition Monitoring of CFRP Drilling,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 78, pp. 307–312, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2018.09.072.
A. D. Patange and R. Jegadeeshwaran, “Review on tool condition classification in milling: A machine learning approach,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 46, pp. 1106–1115, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.01.523.
F. Jin, Y. Bao, B. Li, and X. Jin, “Tool wear prediction in edge trimming of carbon fiber reinforced polymer using machine learning with instantaneous parameters,” Journal of Manufacturing Processes, vol. 82, pp. 277–295, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.08.006.
K. Zhu, H. Guo, S. Li, and X. Lin, “Online tool wear monitoring by super-resolution based machine vision,” Computers in Industry, vol. 144, p. 103782, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2022.103782.
K. A. Ajayram, R. Jegadeeshwaran, G. Sakthivel, R. Sivakumar, and A. D. Patange, “Condition monitoring of carbide and non-carbide coated tool insert using decision tree and random tree – A statistical learning,” Materials Today: Proceedings, vol. 46, pp. 1201–1209, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.065.
Y. Liu, L. Guo, H. Gao, Z. You, Y. Ye, and B. Zhang, “Machine vision based condition monitoring and fault diagnosis of machine tools using information from machined surface texture: A review,” Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 164, p. 108068, Feb. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.108068.
P. Twardowski, M. Tabaszewski, M. Wiciak – Pikuła, and A. Felusiak-Czyryca, “Identification of tool wear using acoustic emission signal and machine learning methods,” Precision Engineering, vol. 72, pp. 738–744, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.precisioneng.2021.07.019.
A. Fertig, M. Weigold, and Y. Chen, “Machine Learning based quality prediction for milling processes using internal machine tool data,” Advances in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, vol. 4, p. 100074, May 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.aime.2022.100074.
M. P. Motta, C. Pelaingre, A. Delamézière, L. B. Ayed, and C. Barlier, “Machine learning models for surface roughness monitoring in machining operations,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 108, pp. 710–715, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2022.03.110.
G. Gokilakrishnan, S. Ganeshkumar, H. Anandakumar, and M. Vigneshkumar, “A Critical Review of Production Distribution Planning Models,” 2021 7th International Conference on Advanced Computing and Communication Systems (ICACCS), Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1109/icaccs51430.2021.9441879.
Cite this article
Ganesh Kumar S and Dharanidharan M, “Investigating the Feasibility of Tool Condition Monitoring Using Cutting Forces -A Critical Review”, Advances in Computational Intelligence in Materials Science, pp. 055-060, June. 2023. doi:10.53759/acims/978-9914-9946-6-7_7
