#

Advances in Intelligent Systems and Technologies

Book Series

About the Book
About the Author
Table of Contents

Buy this Book

eBook
  • • Included format: Online and PDF
  • • eBooks can be used on all reading devices
  • • ISSN : 2959-3042
  • • ISBN : 978-9914-9946-0-5


Hardcover
  • • Including format: Hardcover
  • • Shipping Available for individuals worldwide
  • • ISSN : 2959-3034
  • • ISBN : 978-9914-9946-3-6


Services for the Book

Download Product Flyer
Download High-Resolutions Cover

First International Conference on Machines, Computing and Management Technologies

Supervised, Unsupervised and Semi-Supervised Word Sense Disambiguation Approaches

Anandakumar Haldorai, Sri Eshwar College of Engineering, Coimbatore, India.


Online First : 30 July 2022
Publisher Name : AnaPub Publications, Kenya.
ISSN (Online) : 2959-3042
ISSN (Print) : 2959-3034
ISBN (Online) : 978-9914-9946-0-5
ISBN (Print) : 978-9914-9946-3-6
Pages : 066-075

Abstract


Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) aims to help humans figure out what a word means when used in a certain setting. According to the Neuro Linguistic Programming (NLP) community, WSD is an AI-complete issue with no human solution in sight. WSD has found widespread usage in a wide variety of applications, including but not limited to: Machine translation (MT), Information Retrieval (IR), Data Mining (DM), Information Extraction (IE), and Lexicology (Lex). It is discovered that WSD may be learned effectively using a variety of different methodologies, including supervised, semi-supervised, and unsupervised methods. These methodologies are sorted into groups according to the kind and quantity of annotated (identified) corpora (data) they need as the primary source of information utilized to distinguish between senses. The unsupervised method employs unannotated (unidentifiable) corpora for training, whereas the semi-supervised method requires a less number of annotated corpora than supervised methods. All these three strategies will critically be discussed in this study.

Keywords


Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD), Dialogue for Reverse Engineering Assessment and Method (DREAM), Machine Translation (MT).

  1. P. Durgaprasad, K. V. N. Sunitha, and B. Padmajarani, “Resolving lexical level ambiguity: Word sense disambiguation for Telugu language by exploiting IndicBERT embeddings,” in Communication, Software and Networks, Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2023, pp. 357–368.
  2. W. Jooste, R. Haque, and A. Way, “Philipp Koehn: Neural Machine Translation: Cambridge university press, 30 jun 2020, www.cambridge.org/9781108497329, DOI: 10.1017/9781108608480,” Mach. Transl., vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 289–299, 2021.
  3. G. Wang, J. Ma, Y. Wang, T. Tao, G. Ren, and H. Zhu, “SUDF-RS: A new foreign exchange rate prediction method considering the complementarity of supervised and unsupervised deep representation features,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 214, no. 119152, p. 119152, 2023.
  4. “Reverse engineering biological networks. Opportunities and challenges in computational methods for pathway inference. Proceedings of the workshop entitled Dialogue on Reverse Engineering Assessment and Methods (DREAM). September 7-8, 2006. Bronx, New York, USA,” Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., vol. 1115, pp. xi–xiv, 1–285, 2007.
  5. A. J. Hill, R. S. Schumacher, and I. Jirak, “A new paradigm for medium-range severe weather forecasts: probabilistic random forest-based predictions,” arXiv [physics.ao-ph], 2022.
  6. N. Wani and K. Raza, “MKL-GRNI: A parallel multiple kernel learning approach for supervised inference of large-scale gene regulatory networks,” PeerJ Comput. Sci., vol. 7, no. e363, p. e363, 2021.
  7. T. Bellotti, R. Matousek, and C. Stewart, “A note comparing support vector machines and ordered choice models’ predictions of international banks’ ratings,” Decis. Support Syst., vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 682–687, 2011.
  8. J. C. Alejandrino, J. P. Bolacoy Jr, and J. V. B. Murcia, “Supervised and unsupervised data mining approaches in loan default prediction,” Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. (IJECE), vol. 13, no. 2, p. 1837, 2023.
  9. Á. Sashalmi, “A geopolitikai elemzés a nemzetközi hatalmi viszonyok vizsgálatának szolgálatában : Csurgai Gyula: Geopolitical Analysis. A Multidimensional Approach to Analyze Power Rivalries in International Relations. Róma: Aracne, 2019. 208 o,” Külü. szle., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 282–290, 2021.
  10. I. Park, P. D. Windschitl, J. E. Miller, A. R. Smith, J. O. Stuart, and M. Biangmano, “People express more bias in their predictions than in their likelihood judgments,” J. Exp. Psychol. Gen., 2022.
  11. D. Wilmot, “Great Expectations: Unsupervised inference of suspense, surprise and salience in storytelling,” arXiv [cs.CL], 2022.
  12. M. A. Miller, X.-J. Feng, G. Li, and H. A. Rabitz, “Identifying biological network structure, predicting network behavior, and classifying network state with High Dimensional Model Representation (HDMR),” PLoS One, vol. 7, no. 6, p. e37664, 2012.
  13. T. Van den Bulcke et al., “SynTReN: a generator of synthetic gene expression data for design and analysis of structure learning algorithms,” BMC Bioinformatics, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 43, 2006.
  14. M. Altenbuchinger, A. Weihs, J. Quackenbush, H. J. Grabe, and H. U. Zacharias, “Gaussian and Mixed Graphical Models as (multi-)omics data analysis tools,” Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Regul. Mech., vol. 1863, no. 6, p. 194418, 2020.
  15. B. Klinger and N. Blüthgen, “Reverse engineering gene regulatory networks by modular response analysis – a benchmark,” Essays Biochem., vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 535–547, 2018.
  16. L. Özbek, “An adaptive extended Kalman filtering approach to nonlinear dynamic gene regulatory networks via short gene expression time series,” Commun. Fac. Sci. Univ. Ank. Ser. A1 Math. Stat., vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 211–220, 2020.
  17. E. Hairer and C. Lubich, “Numerical analysis of ordinary differential equations,” in Encyclopedia of Applied and Computational Mathematics, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015, pp. 1053–1059.
  18. I. Umoren, E. Polycarp, and G. Ansa, “Spectrum scheduling classification using conditional probability and a decision tree supervised learning approach,” 2022.
  19. J. Han, T. Zhang, Y. Li, and Z. Liu, “RD-NMSVM: neural mapping support vector machine based on parameter regularization and knowledge distillation,” Int. j. mach. learn. cybern., vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 2785–2798, 2022.
  20. D. Rao, N. Garera, and D. Yarowsky, “JHU1: An unsupervised approach to person name disambiguation using web snippets,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations - SemEval ’07, 2007.
  21. L. A. McGarrity, D. M. Huebner, and R. K. McKinnon, “Putting stigma in context: Do perceptions of group stigma interact with personally experienced discrimination to predict mental health?,” Group Process. Intergroup Relat., vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 684–698, 2013.
  22. L. A. Vinh, “The number of occurrences of a fixed spread among n directions in vector spaces over finite fields,” Graphs Comb., vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 1943–1949, 2013.
  23. Q. Shen and Q. Wang, “Phase difference based Doppler disambiguation method for TDM-MIMOFMCW radars,” arXiv [eess.SP], 2022.

Cite this article


Anandakumar Haldorai, “Supervised, Unsupervised and Semi-Supervised Word Sense Disambiguation Approaches”, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Technologies, pp. 066-075. 2022. doi:10.53759/aist/978-9914-9946-0-5_8

Copyright


© 2023 Anandakumar Haldorai. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.